MISSING TRADER INTRA-COMMUNITY FRAUD
Letter from Rt Hon Jane Kennedy MP, Financial
Secretary, HM Treasury, to the Chairman
Thank you for your letter of 23 October
2007[6]
about the 2006-07 estimates of attempted Missing Trader Intra-Community
(MTIC) fraud, which were published alongside the Pre-Budget Report.
As the Paymaster General has previously explained
to the Committee, statistics published by the Office for National
Statistics, using HMRC data on the UK's overseas trade, provide
an indication of the scale and trend of trading activity associated
with attempted MTIC carousel fraud. These statistics, along with
other operational indicators, suggest most of the MTIC related
trading activity in 2006-07 took place in the first quarter.
ESTIMATES OF
IMPACT OF
MTIC ON BALANCE
OF PAYMENTS[7]
Quarter ending
| Balance of
payments £bn |
| September 2004 | 0.6
|
| December 2004 | 0.7 |
| March 2005 | 1.0 |
| June 2005 | 2.3 |
| September 2005 | 3.5 |
| December 2005 | 4.4 |
| March 2006 | 10.0 |
| June 2006 | 10.7 |
| September 2006 | 1.8 |
| December 2006 | 0.4 |
| March 2007 | 0.3 |
| June 2007 | 0.3 |
| September 2007 | 0.3 |
| |
The total value of overseas trade associated with MTIC was
estimated at £10.7 billion in the first quarter of 2006-07,
compared with a total of £2.5 billion for the rest of
the year. This, together with operational information on suspect
trading activity, is the basis of our confidence in asserting
that MTIC fraud reduced dramatically in response to HMRC's interventions.
More recent data suggest that the fraud remains at historically
low levels, with MTIC-related trading activity estimated at £0.6 billion
in the first six months of 2007-08. I hope that this clarifies
the evidence provided by the Paymaster General in February this
year.
You asked whether the fraud might have mutated to other sectors.
Indicators do not suggest any area of significant new exploitation;
however, we remain vigilant and continue working to proof our
strategy against potential mutations in the goods, people or trading
behaviour associated with MTIC fraud.
You also asked about the verification by HMRC of suspect
VAT repayment claims. Those whose claims are selected for verification
remain a tiny fraction of the 1.9 million VAT-registered
businesses in the UK. The number and value of claims selected
for verification, as well as the number of new traders affected
by this activity, have fallen in recent months, reflecting the
general and significant reduction in the pattern of fraud-related
trading activity. The additional traders affected have been identified
because of suspect trading patterns indicative of MTIC fraud.
As soon as HMRC identifies a claim, or part-claim, associated
with genuine business transactions, overheads or expenses, it
repays those sums. To date, around 1% by value of the VAT withheld
under the verification programme has been found to be correctly
claimed and properly payable.
I hope that this answers your questions and reassures the
Committee about our commitment to the continuing success of the
MTIC strategy.
10 November 2007
6 Correspondence with Ministers, 11th Report of
Session 2008-09, HL Paper 92, p 8. Back
7
Figures issued by ONS 9 November 2007. Back
|