United Kingdom Parliament
Publications & records
Advanced search
 HansardArchivesResearchHOC PublicationsHOL PublicationsCommittees
Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 100 - 101)

WEDNESDAY 11 JULY 2007

Dr Mark Avery, Dr Sue Armstrong-Brown and Mr Harry Huyton

  Q100  Chairman: One specific: something which could come out of the Health Check would be the abolition of set-aside. Views?

  Dr Avery: As we said, set-aside has done environmental good accidentally. It was not an environmental scheme. The RSPB supported set-aside when it came in, but it has done good. It is going to disappear and it makes sense in policy terms that it does disappear. Why would you have a system for limiting production when your funding is not based on production? But we would like to see the accidental but real benefits of set-aside somehow incorporated into the future, so we would not want to lose the environmental benefits of set-aside. That is one reason why we are keen on more money going into agri-environment schemes which could take up the slack if set-aside disappears, as it surely will at some stage.

  Q101  Chairman: I think we are just about done. If you could rack your brain, is there anything you would like to say but you have not had the opportunity of saying?

  Dr Avery: I think not, but if there is something -

  Dr Armstrong-Brown: It has been touched on, sort of, through some of the conversations we have had. For a more positive outcome from the Health Check and the Budget Review that is coming up to happen, for a new CAP to evolve, there is going to have to be a catalysis mechanism to get that debate going in Europe. It is very live in this country. It is extremely good. There is high-quality thinking going on. I do not think you get such high-quality debates everywhere else in Europe, and I do think they are necessary to think through these things properly. Through our partner organisations in Bird Life International we are trying to do some of it, but I do think there is a major role for the UK Government here to lead that debate in a positive way which actually requires mental engagement from people rather than posturing. I do think that is absolutely crucial and it will be one of the things that makes the new CAP good or bad, depending on how it is done.

  Chairman: Thank you very much indeed. Thank you for your time and your help.






 
previous page contents

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008