Relevant developments during our
inquiry
12. An important development which occurred during
our inquiry was the publication of a report[5]
by the Department of Health's (DH) Organ Donation Taskforce which
made recommendations about how to re-organise the health infrastructure
in the UK in order to increase organ donation rates. The issues
addressed by the Taskforce report were also central to the subject
matter of our inquiry and we heard a great deal of evidence from
our witnesses which related to the recommendations it made. Our
evidence and conclusions on this issue are reported in chapter
6.
13. We were delighted to hear from Elisabeth
Buggins, Chair of the Organ Donation Taskforce that the Government
had allocated, in full, the funding needed for implementation
of the recommendations of the Taskforce report (Q 489).
14. We were pleased also to hear from Ann Keen MP,
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health Services that
a new National Clinical Director for Transplant had been appointed
in April 2008 with the responsibility of taking forward delivery
of the Taskforce recommendations (Q 490).
15. The timing of our inquiry also coincided
with a great deal of publicity, arising from the proposal set
out in the CMO's report[6],
that current legislation in England should be changed in order
to create a "presumed consent" or "opt-out"
system for organ donation in place of the existing "opt-in"
system. The EU has no competence in this area, and the Commission
has shown no intention of suggesting what model for consent Member
States should adopt. Nevertheless, the potential advantages and
disadvantages of presumed consent are so central to the assessment
of how the supply of donor organs might be increased, that our
inquiry needed to take account of the arguments both for and against
the CMO's suggestion. Our evidence and conclusions on this issue
are reported in chapter 8.
16. In September 2007, the Organ Donation Taskforce
was requested by the Secretary of State for Health to explore
the issue of presumed consent. We understand that the Taskforce
report will be published in summer 2008 so there has been no opportunity
to take account of its findings in our inquiry. We hope, however,
that our Report will provide a useful input to the work of Taskforce
on this issue and we have sent it to the Taskforce Chair drawing
her attention to the relevant sections.
How we conducted the inquiry
17. The Members of our Social Policy and Consumer
Affairs Sub-Committee (Sub-Committee G) who conducted the Inquiry,
showing their declared interests, are listed in Appendix 1.
18. We are most grateful for the evidence that
we received for our inquiry; the witnesses who provided it are
listed in Appendix 2. In particular, we thank those witnesses
who gave us evidence in person. The Calls for Evidence we issued
are shown in Appendices 3 and 4, and the evidence we received
in response is printed in a companion volume to this Report.
19. We acknowledge with considerable thanks the
expertise and hard work of our Specialist Adviser for the inquiryProfessor Bobbie
Farsides of the Brighton and Sussex Medical Schoolwho played
a key role in helping us to prepare the Report.
20. We make this Report to the House for debate.
1 Department of Health, On the state of public health:
Annual report of the Chief Medical Officer 2006, July 2007. Back
2
European Commission Communication, Organ donation and transplantation:
policy actions at EU level, May 2007. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_threats/human_substance/documents/organs_com_en.pdf Back
3
Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for
the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation,
storage and distribution of human tissues and cells, OJ L102,
7.4.2004, p. 48-58 Back
4
Treaty establishing the European Community: Article 152(4)a.
"The Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred
to in Article 251 and after consulting the Economic and Social
Committee and the Committee of the Regions, shall contribute to
the achievement of the objectives referred to in this Article
through adopting: (a) measures setting high standards of quality
and safety of organs and substances of human origin, blood and
blood derivatives; these measures shall not prevent any Member
State from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective
measures." Back
5
Department of Health, Organs for Transplants: A report from
the Organ Donation Taskforce, January 2008 Back
6
op. cit. Back