Examination of Witnesses (Questions 895
- 899)
TUESDAY 17 APRIL 2007
MR ACHIM
KLABUNDE, MS
MARGARETA TRAUNG,
MS ZINAIDA
YUDINA, MR
ANDREW SERVIDA
AND MR
ROGIER HOLLA
Q895 Chairman: Good
afternoon and thank you all for agreeing to meet with us. We are
members of the House of Lords Select Committee for Science and
Technology. I am the Chairman of this Committee and we are in
the latter stages of an inquiry into personal Internet security.
This Committee looks into issues that involve science and technology
but which we feel have an impact upon people in general and upon
which we think the government can have an influence. So we have
been looking into the security issues that people are faced with
in using the Internet. We have been talking to a number of agencies
here in the UK and we have visited the United States, but we felt
it very important that we talk to you about the EU's work in this
area so that we can understand how well the UK is coordinated
with those efforts and to learn what you are doing. So that, in
the way of introduction, is what we are about. I would be happy
to answer any questions before we start with our questions. Do
you have any questions for us to start with?
Mr Servida: I would suggest that we introduce ourselves
from Brussels and Luxembourg so that you will also get an idea
of the role and responsibility that we have in the Directorate-General
for Information Society and Media.
Q896 Chairman:
That is an excellent idea. Perhaps you would start by introducing
yourself?
Mr Servida: My name is Andrea Servida; I am
the Deputy Head of the Unit in charge of Network and Information
Security policy and Internet governance within the Directorate-General
for Information Society and Media. I will unfortunately have to
excuse myself because in half an hour I would like to move to
another site in Brussels because I will be joining you with Commissioner
Reding later at five, so I will have to leave this meeting to
reach my Commissioner. So I will give the responsibility or keeping
order on Brussels to my colleague to my right.
Mr Holla: My name is Rogier Holla; I also work
in the unit for Network and Information Security and I am in particular
responsible for relations with the agency ENISA, the European
Network and Information Security Agency.
Mr Bisch: My name is Anthony Bisch; I am working
in the same unit as Andrea Servida on the question of Network
Information and Security.
Ms Gayraud: Hello, I am Valérie Gayraud
and I also work with Andrea on Network and Information Security
policies.
Mr Klabunde: My name is Achim Klabunde and I
am working in the unit in DG for Information Society and Media,
which is in charge of the policy development and of the regulatory
framework for electronic communications, and I am leading the
team that is responsible for privacy, trust and related issues
in this respect.
Mr Schik: My name is Merijn Schik; I work in
the team that Achim just introduced and also I am responsible
for international co-operation on spam and related matters.
Ms Traung: My name is Margareta Traung and I
am working with the Safer Internet Programme, which is run from
Luxembourg.
Ms Yudina: My name is Zinaida Yudina and I am
working at the same unit as Margareta.
Q897 Chairman:
Thank you all very much. Let me open with the first question and
ask you who, in your opinion, is responsible for personal Internet
security? Would you like to start in Brussels, Mr Servida?
Mr Servida: Yes, thank you very much. To answer
your question I would refer to what we put forward as policy strategy
in May 2006, our strategy for a secure information society, and
there we have looked at the situation of electronic communication
and the Internet in particular with respect to how the situation
has changed with respect to what had been the last intervention
of the Commission in terms of coordinated policy in this domain.
This happened indeed in 2001 and in five years we have seen quite
a lot of things changing, in particular with respect to the change
of fresh scenarios but also the impact of technology development,
which has somehow made Internet develop towards a more ubiquitous
type of service and infrastructure. In this respect we believe
that the responsibility for personal information security is a
shared responsibility that should somehow involve first of all,
of course, the users who need to understand what are their duties
and also their obligations and their full responsibilities to
protect themselves and also to make their security to be an essential
component of everybody else's security, everybody else who is
connected through the networks to the devicesthe computer,
the devices that the user is using for his or her own purpose.
Also we believe that it is the responsibility of those who are
providing the services to the users because of course the users
have not only limited capabilities in terms of understanding what
the threats are that are out there and how these threats could
become real and not only have an impact to them but also how these
threats could somehow be exploited through the users themselves
and their devices and to have an impact on others who are connected
to the same networks. In this respect we have asked the private
sector, the service provider to look at the way they can somehow
take up the responsibility of, on the one hand, improving the
security of their services, including the security of their systemssoftware
and hardware componentsbut also possibly be available to
even more direct awareness campaigns, which should be targeted
to the users who are the ultimate customers of the services being
provided by those operators. Of course we should also not forget
about the responsibility that Member States and the Commission
have in ensuring, on the one hand, that there is a regulatory
and policy framework in place which is somehow providing certainty
with respect to how to pursue these security objectives and protect
the users, but also how to motivate the playerstherefore,
the private sector operators but also the users themselvesto
adopt the technologies and the solutions that already exist and
that we hope will be refined through more research and development
activities to make the Internet a safe place for everybody to
work and to act.
Chairman: Thank you. Would any other
of you like to comment on this question? If not, we will go on
to the second question and I am going to turn Lord Sutherland,
who is three to my right, to ask the second question.
Q898 Lord Sutherland of Houndwood:
Thank you very much, Chairman. Being from Scotland I tend to be
interested in money and I wanted to ask a question about the economic
impact of Internet-related crime, direct or indirect costs. Can
you help give any estimate of what the impact is, what the costs
are for the European economy?
Mr Servida: Perhaps I can help in this respect
with clarifying something? We at the Directorate-General for Information
Society and Media look at the issue of security and resilience
of networks from what we call in Brussels the first pillar perspective,
which is, I would say, in the light of what is in need of the
internal market, the protection of consumers and the other associated
aspects which make our intervention needed as well as of the impact
to society. For what concerns cyber crime and everything that
has to do with more directly third pillar issues the responsibility
is more in the hands of our colleagues in D-G Justice, Freedom
and Security, who respond to Commissioner Frattini who I understand
you are possibly going to contact later on. So in order not to
give numbers that might be considered already obsolete by the
police I would ask you to perhaps redirect this question to my
colleagues who have more up to date numbers than ourselves, in
particular because they have a much tighter co-operation with
the police service and law enforcement agencies in Member States,
which, altogether, I would say, co-operate in defining what is
indeed the impact and the size of cyber crime in Europe. Of course,
I must also say that while working on the communication that I
mentioned earlier, which was adopted in May last year, we have
also tried to look at what is the size of crime-related or security-related
problems in Europe and unfortunately we have seen that apart from
what is in the area of cyber crime we very much lack data that
is consistent all across the different European Member States,
and in this respect we have indeed requested inter-communication,
we have requested ENISA to work with Member States to define a
trusted partnership with a view to developing a framework which
should allow the collection and the definition of data associated
to security incidents and security problems.
Q899 Lord Sutherland of Houndwood:
Thank you very much indeed; we will take this up with the Commissioner.
Mr Servida: There is a colleague who would like
to add something, if possible.
Mr Klabunde: I would just like to underline
what my colleague has just said. One problem is, of course, that
if you say 'cyber crime' or 'Internet-related crime', there is
no common definition for these terms, so even when there are statistics
produced, the different definitions used make it very difficult
to add up the figures and to get a global number. The Commission
made a statement in its communication on spam last year where
it quoted industry figures which estimated the cost of spam, which
is of course not necessarily always crime but often connected
to crime, to an amount of 39 billion for the year 2005 worldwide
and figures between 3.5 billion and 1.4 billion for the biggest
Member States of the EU. But that would only be blowing the snow
from the top of the icebergit certainly does not give the
entire picture.
|