United Kingdom Parliament
Publications & records
Advanced search
 HansardArchivesResearchHOC PublicationsHOL PublicationsCommittees
Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page



5 Mar 2007 : Column WA1

Written Answers

Monday 5 March 2007

Agriculture: Dairy and Pig Farmers

Baroness Byford asked Her Majesty's Government:

The Minister of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Lord Rooker): The number of holdings in England recording pigs or dairy cows is shown below. Figures for the other UK countries fall under the jurisdiction of the devolved authorities.

Pigs and no Dairy Dairy and no Pigs Dairy and Pigs
HoldingsFarmersHoldingsFarmersHoldingsFarmers

1997

8,530

14,273

21,216

41,233

1,716

3,478

1998

8,517

14,393

20,626

41,459

1,690

3,439

1999

7,979

13,281

19,852

39,935

1,474

2,945

2000

7,998

13,584

18,753

38,362

1,341

2,652

2001

7,936

13,834

17,260

35,994

1,254

2,531

2002

8,130

13,525

17,536

36,237

1,141

2,219

2003

7,972

12,914

16,623

34,545

1,035

1,953

2004

8,305

13,648

16,128

33,727

1,072

1,975

2005

8,653

13,938

15,491

31,094

1,014

1,863

2006

8,260

13,643

15,009

30,396

985

1,873

Source: June Agricultural Survey
Notes:
1. Data prior to 2000 are for main holding only. From 2000 onwards, all holdings are included.
2. Estimates have been made for holdings not responding or not selected for the survey.
3. Farmers include full- and part-time farmers, partners, directors and spouses, if working on the holding.
4. Due to the introduction of new labour questions in 1998, figures prior to this year are not directly comparable with earlier years’ results.
5. Due to a register improvement exercise in 2001, labour figures prior to this are not directly comparable with later results.

Armed Forces: Deployment

Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked Her Majesty's Government:

The Attorney-General (Lord Goldsmith): Advice from the law officers is covered by legal professional privilege and is subject to a longstanding convention that prevents disclosure of the advice—or even the fact that the law officers have been consulted—outside Government. The Government consider it important for Parliament and the public to be given a proper explanation of the legal basis on which key decisions, such as a decision to use force against another state, are taken.

This is what happened in relation to Iraq in 2003. While there is a particular need for certainty and clarity in relation to military action, the public interest would not necessarily be served by publication of the legal advice itself, which may refer to secret intelligence or military plans and could include references to the arguments both for and against what is proposed. It would be for the Prime Minister of the day to determine how best fully to explain the legal basis for action to Parliament, including whether that could be done by disclosing the legal advice received in that respect.

Armed Forces: Inquests

Lord Tebbit asked Her Majesty's Government:

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs (Baroness Ashton of Upholland): Since the Court of Appeal judgment in Helen Smith in 1983, it has been mandatory for an inquest to be held into a death overseas where the body is repatriated to England and Wales and the death is unnatural, violent or sudden, of unknown cause or occurred in custody. This includes the deaths of service personnel killed in exercises and conflicts overseas. Before 1983, coroners had discretion about whether to hold an inquest in deaths that occurred overseas where the body was repatriated to England and Wales.

Armed Forces: Nicosia Accommodation

Lord Kilclooney asked Her Majesty's Government:

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Triesman): The UN is responsible for the provision of accommodation for all UN troops in Cyprus. This is done in conjunction with the Republic of Cyprus under a status of forces agreement between the UN and Cyprus. As the UN peacekeeping force in Cyprus is funded from the UN's assessed peacekeeping budget, all UN member states are liable for the costs of the peacekeeping operation. The UK's share of this comes from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office-administered peacekeeping budget, drawn from HM Treasury.

Avian Flu

The Duke of Montrose asked Her Majesty's Government:

The Minister of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Lord Rooker): The epidemiological investigation is ongoing and, as yet, we have not been able to rule out any method of introduction.

At present, genetic sequencing of isolates of the H5N1 virus has not revealed another virus similar to that found in Hungary and Suffolk. As part of the ongoing investigation, we are investigating whether the outbreaks in England and Hungary came from a common third source. A full report will be published when the investigation is complete. It is likely that that will take a few weeks yet.

Baroness Byford asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: Existing EU trade rules set out the measures that must be adopted by a member state if it experiences an outbreak of a serious disease, such as avian influenza. The European Commission will propose additional safeguard measures, depending on the severity of the situation within the affected member state.

All consignments of live poultry traded within the EU must be accompanied by an original health certificate signed by an official veterinarian of the exporting member state. This indicates that the poultry do not come from flocks or premises within disease-protection or surveillance zones in member states.

Within the UK, the State Veterinary Service (SVS) carries out risk-based checks on imports of poultry from other member states as a further measure to minimise the introduction of animal diseases into the country.

The European Commission is responsible for ensuring that Community legislation on food safety, animal health, plant health and animal welfare is properly implemented and enforced.

One of the means by which the Commission can monitor these issues is through regular missions conducted by the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) to individual member states and to countries outside Europe. These FVO missions produce reports on the visited country's capability, resources and levels of compliance, among other issues. They are reviewed by the Commission and other member states at regular meetings of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health (SCoFCAH).

Baroness Byford asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: In administrating a similar support regime last year, the EC made it clear that the assumption would be that no future use would be made of market support provision, and that industry would need to prepare itself for any similar market fluctuations in the future.

It has been the policy of successive UK Governments not to provide market support. Market impacts of animal disease are a risk carried by the industry. However, the Government seek to minimise that risk, particularly by encouraging wide public understanding of the issues and an evidence-based and proportionate response.

Baroness Byford asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: Culling to control the recent outbreak of H5N1 was carried out in accordance with Defra's revised Contingency Plan for Exotic Animal Diseases, which was laid before Parliament on 13 December 2006. Although the company's own slaughterhouse on an adjacent site was used in this case, it is highly unlikely such a method would be available in the future; however, the department has a number of other options available. As the Secretary of State said on 19 February in his Statement to the House (Official Report col. 29), we are determined to learn any and all lessons following this outbreak. This includes all aspects of the regulatory regime, domestic and international. Consistent with past practice, work is already being done to learn the lessons of this outbreak, and when it is concluded it will be published for public scrutiny.

Baroness Byford asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Rooker: All possible routes of infection are being investigated, and we have not yet been able to rule out any method of introduction. However, the possibility of workers carrying the disease is very small, and no such movements have been identified to date.


Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page