Select Committee on European Union Fourth Report


CHAPTER 2: Past trends and The Current Position of Rail Freight in the European Union

7.  Rail freight has steadily lost its market share in the movement of freight in Western Europe over the last 30 years. Figure 1 shows that its market share has dropped from 20.1 per cent in 1970 to just 8.1 per cent in 2000 in the then 15 European Union Member States. In the new Member States the decline in market share has been more precipitous since the end of communism and the end of protection of the rail freight market.

8.  However, freight movement as a whole is a growing market and whilst the rail freight industry has lost percentage share of the market, the actual volume of freight moved by rail has, as Figure 2, shows, stayed roughly constant within the EU-15 in recent years.

9.  The Committee were concerned to discover that the rail freight industry had not grown substantially in the past thirty years since freight transport in the European Union has grown in that time and some of the barriers restricting European rail freight ought to have been removed.

10.  Rail has traditionally moved heavy, bulk items such as coal and steel. The great reduction in these markets within the European Union (illustrated for France, Germany and Great Britain in Figure 3) in the past 30 years has undoubtedly had a large negative effect on rail freight. The industry has however managed to achieve some growth in other markets, such as the transport of goods in containers and manufactured goods.

11.  Rail is cheaper than road freight over long distances, as the written and oral evidence that we received, especially that from Transfesa, demonstrated. Transfesa estimates that rail freight costs approximately €0.45 per kilometre per container or swap-body whereas road freight costs between €0.65 and €0.80 per kilometre per container or swap-body[1] (Tr Supp. Wr evi). Admittedly this is based specifically on Spanish data, but we have no reason to suppose that the comparison is substantially different elsewhere in Europe.

12.  Even though rail freight has lost some of its market share, the favourable economic climate of the late 1990s allowed rail freight in the European Union to grow in absolute terms but, as Figure 2 shows, it slipped back in 2001. Figure 4 also shows that rail freight has grown considerably since privatisation in Great Britain. Lord Berkeley (European Rail Freight Customers Platform) said that since privatisation rail freight volumes in Great Britain have gone up by 50 per cent (Q 70). The Department for Transport claimed that in Great Britain since privatisation, rail freight has increased by 42% in terms of freight moved (w.evi.para 2). Lord Berkeley was clear that competition between the four private rail freight companies now operating in the United Kingdom had helped this increased market share. He described open access in Great Britain as a success (Q72). We recognise that a mature industry and an independent regulator have added to this.

FIGURE 1



From Current Developments in European Integration Financial Services, Transport Policy, edited by Dirk Heremans et al, Leuven Law Series 18, Leuven University Press, 2004, p.164 reproduced by kind permission of Leuven University Press

FIGURE 2


From Current Developments in European Integration Financial Services, Transport Policy, edited by Dirk Heremans et al, Leuven Law Series 18, Leuven University Press,

2004, p.164 reproduced by kind permission of Leuven University Press

FIGURE 3 Rail Freight Traffic (m. tonnes) 1982-2002
Germany
France
UK
Total
Of which coal, ore
Total
Of which coal, ore
Total
Of which coal
1982
228
100
130
31
146
91
1992
275
117
92
12
122
68
2002*
189
62
89
11
87
41

*1998 for France

Source: Eurostat for France, Germany

The commodity categories are coal and mineral fuels, iron ore and waste.

Germany includes the former DDR for 1992, 2002.

SRA for Great Britain. Data for iron ore and waste not available.

FIGURE 4 Rail freight traffic in Great Britain since 1990

Rail Freight Traffic b tonne km
Great Britain
1990 - 1991
16.0
1995 - 1966
13.3
2000 - 2001
18.1
2001 - 2002
19.4
2002- 2003
18.7
2003 - 2004
18.9

Existing and proposed European legislation

13.  We have already explained that the rail freight industry is not as successful as many would wish (see paragraphs 7 to 12). Against this background, the European Community has legislated and is introducing further legislation. In its 2001 White Paper it set itself the target of stabilising the rail share of the freight market, and cited the contribution rail could make to the relief of road congestion and environmental damage as reasons for seeking this reversal of trends. One key measure to achieve this was the introduction of infrastructure charging regimes in all modes which would fully reflect all costs of use of the infrastructure by the traffic in question, including congestion, accidents and environmental costs. Directive 2001/14 provides for such an approach for rail. However, the only measure proposed regarding road transport infrastructure charges since this White Paper, the Eurovignette proposals of 2003, did not permit the level of charges to reflect all these costs, and in any case agreement on the introduction of this measure has yet to be achieved.

14.  As far as rail is concerned, the European Commission believes that part of the solution to the declining market share of rail freight lies in creating a liberalised single market within the European Union. The three Railway Packages contain an attempt to deal with the problems that have hindered the rail freight industry in the recent past so that the industry can improve its performance and increase its share of the freight market.

15.  The key approach of the Commission to achieving this has been to open the rail freight market to competition. This process began with Directive 91/440, which created open access rights for certain international rail freight operators, but has greatly accelerated with the proposals contained in three Railway Packages in recent years.

16.  The First Railway Package[2], which Member States were required to implement by the end of 2003, extended the European Union's policy of open access for international rail freight services. Due to fears that vertically integrated operators would use their control of the infrastructure to favour their own services, it also introduced various measures to try to ensure transparent and non-discriminatory charges and access conditions for use of the infrastructure. Specifically it required that:

  • the body responsible for path allocation and the setting of charges must be independent of any transport operator;
  • where infrastructure, passenger operations and freight operations are part of the same organisation, they must be in separate divisions with separate accounts;
  • in each Member State there must be a regulator, to hear appeals and regulate access charges, who is independent of the infrastructure manager;
  • any charges to train operating companies for access to infrastructure must be based on direct cost although non-discriminatory mark-ups are allowed in cases where a higher level of cost recovery is necessary; and
  • all authorised international rail freight operators should have open access to the trans-European rail freight network[3] and, by 2008, open access to the whole network.

17.  The Second Railway Package[4] has been adopted but does not have to be fully implemented by Member States until 31 December 2005. It seeks to deal with the barriers to entry posed by safety regulation and lack of interoperability of rolling stock and also extends and accelerates the introduction of open access by requiring that:

  • A new European Rail Agency should be set up to advise the Commission on the implementation of technical standards for interoperability and common safety requirements; and
  • The date of complete opening of the rail network for international freight services should be brought forward to January 2006 and that open access for domestic freight should be introduced in 2007.

18.  The Third Railway Package[5] which has not yet been adopted has three main objectives:

  • to introduce open access for international rail passenger services;
  • to further improve interoperability by introducing an international rail drivers' licence valid throughout the Union; and
  • to give direct incentives for the improvement of rail service quality by introducing compulsory provisions in rail freight contracts for compensation to be paid to customers when stipulated quality standards are not met.



1   An inter-modal loading unit Back

2   The 1st RP comprises three Directives; Directive 2001/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways [2001] OJ L 075; Directive 2001/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings [2001] OJ L 075; Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification [2001] OJ L 075 Back

3   A network which includes almost all routes currently used by international freight trains Back

4   The 2nd RP is comprised of three Directives: Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community's railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification [2004] OJ L 164; Directive 2004/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 96/48/EC on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system and Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system [2004] OJ L 164; Directive 2004/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways [2004] OJ L 164. Back

5   This includes COM(2004) 139, COM (2004) 140, COM(2004) 142 and COM(2004) 144 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005