Examination of Witnesses (Questions 127-139)
11 FEBRUARY 2004
Dr Brenda Boardman and Mr Graham Sinden
Q127 Chairman: Good afternoon. Thank you
very much for coming to see us. May we begin, please. I have to
say at the beginning that you should be aware that these proceedings
are public, on the record and are being broadcast live as a web
cast. I wonder if I could ask you if you would introduce yourselves
in turn, simply to say who you are and what you do.
Dr Boardman: Thank you very much. We are delighted
to be here.
Q128 Chairman: Could I also ask everyone
to speak up because the acoustics in this room are very bad. If
you see me doing that, it means I cannot hear you.
Dr Boardman: Good afternoon, everybody. We are
delighted to be here. My name is Brenda Boardman. I am from the
Environmental Change Institute, which is part of the University
of Oxford. I lead a group called Lower Carbon Futures. May I introduce
Graham Sinden, who is one of our researchers.
Q129 Chairman: Thank you very much. We have
alerted you to a number of questions that we might wish to ask
you. We may not be able to reach all of those this afternoon but
perhaps if we do not reach any we might be able to do those by
correspondence afterwards. Your submission describes really what
is a considerable research effort and explores various scenarios
for electricity generation from renewable sources and the management
of intermittency. Could you give us an initial overview of your
research and your results?
Dr Boardman: I am going to ask Graham to answer
most of the questions because it is his research that we are reporting
on, so it is better if it comes from him.
Mr Sinden: Thank you very much. The basis of
the research was to look at the question of intermittency to try
and quantify what was happening with intermittency in wind and
solar energy and domestic combined heat and power systems. In
summary, we took a large body of wind speed data from around England
and Wales. We used 13 different sites from around England and
Wales with 21 years of hourly wind speed data at each. We used
hourly solar radiation data for London and we used temperature
data for London to infer domestic combined heat and power output.
We were able to construct a model which on an hourly basis balanced
what would be coming from wind farms at different locations, what
would be coming from solar power and what would be coming from
dCHP against what the electricity demand was in that hour, so
that model was then run for the 21 years of data that we had.
The objective was to find a mix of renewable technologies and
sites where those technologies would be used that provided the
best match between intermittent electricity supply and the demand
patterns that we see currently.
Q130 Chairman: The output of models is all
very well but you have to have a fair amount of reality in them.
Did you choose as the locations for your wind generation the sites
which have already been identified by the Government as places
where they would like to see this? How did you choose them?
Mr Sinden: The 13 wind sites that we used were
the first round offshore wind sites that were licensed by the
Government. That formed the basis of the wind power aspect of
it. For solar and CHP we just used London as a single site for
the generation of those electricity supplies.
Q131 Chairman: Thank you very much. Did
you do your analysis by hour or by day of wind power?
Mr Sinden: It is average hourly wind speed for
every hour between 1980-2000.
Q132 Chairman: Did you compare your analysis
with the output of other bodies who have done similar things,
like the Oxera group, for example, based in Oxford too?
Mr Sinden: The wind data that the Oxera report
was based around was some work that I did for Oxera.
Q133 Chairman: It is not surprising that
they agreed.
Mr Sinden: I am not familiar with the model
that they ran afterwards but I am familiar with the data that
they fed into it at the start. Broadly our results are consistent
with a number of studies in this field. I think one of the defining
differences with our work is that we do treat the data on an hour
by hour basis rather than aggregating the data and looking at
probabilities. With the approach we have used we are able to identify
what is the worst case scenario, the worst hour where intermittent
supply is low and demand is high.
Q134 Chairman: If I remember rightly, I
think Oxera recognises a figure of something like eight hours
during the year when zero wind production or minimum wind production
corresponds to maximum demand or something of that kind. That
is simply for wind.
Mr Sinden: That is simply for wind. It is in
that order, I cannot remember the specific numbers.
Q135 Lord Young of Graffham: Last autumn
we went over to Denmark, it was a rather windy day I remember,
to see the Horns Rev field. The operators told us that on occasion
the output could drop by 100 megawatts in a matter of a few minutes.
Do you have the confidence that if we were to expand wind power
substantially in the way that you foresee that we would still
have a system which could keep the wind going?
Mr Sinden: Yes, I believe so. What you are describing
there is something that you would expect to see where you have
a lot of wind turbines in one place because all those wind turbines
are experiencing the same wind, or in the case of changing output
they are experiencing the same change in wind at the same time.
If you use a geographically distributed system where you have
wind farms in quite distant locations around the country these
are going to be experiencing different winds at the same time
and, therefore, you will not be seeing all turbines responding
the same way at the same time. Across the portfolio that you have,
you will have a far more reliable wind electricity supply than
what you have seen just at one wind farm.
Q136 Lord Young of Graffham: Did your statistics,
looking back over the last 20-odd years, show any periods when
we were high pressure and we had no winds for two or three days?
Mr Sinden: It is an interesting question because
it does get raised a fair bit but in essence, no. We have looked
at that 21 year period and the longest consecutive time of calm
across England and Waleswe are not including Scotlandwas
11 hours and that 11 hours was overnight in summer, so there was
quite a low electricity demand at that time.
Q137 Lord Tombs: I am interested in this
question of diversity, and it is obvious there will be diversity,
but how consistent is it likely to be between the chosen sites?
Are you able to say, for example, the worse case we will encounter
will be 40 per cent generation or something? The diversity must
vary between nothing and another figure.
Mr Sinden: Even with a highly diverse system
you will get quite a range of outputs. The data that we have looked
at shows that the more diversity you have within the system, and
particularly with distance, so if you have a wind farm located
in the South of England and you have a wind farm located in the
North of Scotland, the difference in wind patterns is quite large
so the movement of electricity output from those different wind
farms is very different. The further you can separate your wind
farms and the greater the geographic representation you have within
your wind farms, the more reliable your output is going to be.
That is not to say that it will be constant, there will be high
points and there will be low points, but it will be more consistent
as you bring more sites in and you separate them further across
the country.
Q138 Lord Tombs: There will be quite a range
of diversity. Wind farms generally offshore will be placed in
the most favourable areas. Is there a link between that and the
behaviour of the wind, in terms of reliability?
Mr Sinden: With the work that we have done we
have been looking at the offshore wind sites in terms of how well
they contribute electricity at certain times rather than their
absolute ability to produce electricity. We see the ability to
produce electricity when electricity is needed as being fundamental
to overcoming problems with intermittency and to guarantee supply
at the times of peak demand. We have not really addressed the
question in terms of whether these offshore sites are absolutely
the largest contributors of electricity.
Lord Tombs: Let us hope they will be
otherwise they will not pay.
Q139 Baroness Platt of Writtle: What about
a stationary anticyclone in the middle of winter over the British
Isles?
Mr Sinden: We have looked at that occurring
in the wind data and the wind data does not show it.
|