THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK (10893/03)
Letter from the Chairman to Ruth Kelly
MP, Financial Secretary, HM Treasury
Thank you for your Explanatory Memorandum of
13 May 2003, which Sub-Committee A considered at its meeting on
20 May. The Sub-Committee decided to clear the documents from
scrutiny.
The Sub-Committee accepts that, as the UK has
not adopted the euro, the Government do not participate in appointments
to the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (ECB) and
should not comment on the suitability of individual candidates.
As you will be aware, however, the Sub-Committee
is conducting an inquiry into the ECB and would like to know the
Government's views on the current procedure for appointing members
of the Governing Council. It would be helpful first of all if
you could clearly set out for the Sub-Committee what the Government
consider to be the merits and demerits of the current system of
appointments to the Executive Board.
You will recall that one of the questions on
the Sub-Committee's Call for Evidence is: What should be the roles
of the Commission, the European Council, the European Parliament
and national parliaments in appointing the President and the other
Members of the Executive Board? In your answer to this broad question,
the Sub-Committee would like you to address the following specific
issues:
(a)
The European Parliament claims the right to confirm
appointments to the Governing Council in the same manner as the
American Senate with the Federal Reserve. Would you support such
a move? Do the Government intend to pursue any such amendments
in the forthcoming IGC?
(b)
The Parliament considers that it is important to
ensure diversity with regards to nominations to the Executive
Board. First, it deems it necessary to nominate for the ECB executive
board not only central bankers but also persons with economic
and monetary expertise recruited from outside the inner circle
of central banking. Secondly, it has declared that more needs
to be done to correct the current female under-representation
on the ECB Board. What steps would the Government like to see
taken to ensure these two forms of diversity?
(c)
The Parliament also considers it important to ensure
diversity when Member States nominate national central bank governors.
What steps are the Government taking to promote such diversity?
The Sub-Committee looks forward to receiving,
in your reply to this letter, the Government's answers to the
questions raised here, and, in due course, to reading your full
response to the other questions in the Call for Evidence.
20 May 2003
Letter from the Chairman to The Rt Hon
Dawn Primarolo MP, Paymaster General, HM Treasury
Thank you for your Explanatory Memorandum on
the above document, which Sub-Committee A considered at its meeting
on 15 July. The Sub-Committee would like to express their strong
support for the recommendation that Mr Trichet should be the next
President of the European Central Bank. The Sub-Committee is also
very pleased to note that the recommendation is that Mr Trichet
should be appointed for the full period of eight years. We trust
that this decision reflects the fact that the Ecofin Council has
now understood that it is a mistake to have split terms of office
for the President and other members of the Executive Board of
the ECB. That is certainly the view of the Committee.
16 July 2003
Letter from John Healey MP, Economic Secretary,
HM Treasury to the Chairman
Thank you for your letter to the Paymaster General
of 16 July 2003 regarding Explanatory Memorandum 10893/03 on the
Appointment of the President of the European Central Bank (ECB).
In the context of the views expressed by Sub-Committee
A with regard to this issue, may I refer you to the Recommendation
adopted by the ECOFIN Council on 15 July 2003. As reported in
the press release issued after the Council met in Brussels:
"The Council adopted the Recommendation
for the nomination of Mr Trichet as next President of the ECB.
In doing so, the procedure for consulting the European Parliament
and the ECB has been launched.
The Council Recommendation establishes that Mr
Trichet should be appointed President of the ECB as from 1 November
2003 for a period of eight years. This date is in line with the
regular procedure, since the European Parliament consultation
is expected to take place at the 22-25 September plenary session.
The Governing Council of the ECB is expected
to give its opinion before the summer holidays.
The formal appointment will then be made by the
Council in the composition of Heads of State or Government in
October, either by written procedure, or alternatively, in the
margins of the meeting of the European Council.
It is recalled that the Heads of State or Government
agreed in Thessaloniki that Jean-Claude Trichet will become the
successor to Wim Duisenberg."
22 July 2003
|