NORWAY AND ICELAND PARTICIPATION IN EU
JUDICIAL CO-OPERATION
Letter from Caroline Flint MP, Parliamentary
Under Secretary of State, Home Office to the Chairman
I am writing to inform you about the progress
of negotiations between the EU and Norway and Iceland regarding
their potential participation in the 2000 Convention on Mutual
Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (the MLAC) and its 2001 Protocol,
and the European Arrest Warrant (the EAW).
Norway and Iceland are full participants in
the Schengen aquis. They are therefore entitled to participate
in those aspects of EU agreements that are deemed to build on
the provisions of the Schengen aquis. Consequently, they will
participate in the Schengen building aspects of the MLAC and its
Protocol by virtue of provisions included in those agreements
when originally negotiated.
However, on 10 July 2001, the Presidency, at
the request of Norway and Iceland, was granted a mandate to negotiate
an agreement on their accession to the non-Schengen related parts
of the MLAC and the Schengen-building parts of the 1995 and 1996
Extradition Conventions. The former was a logical consequence
of their partial participation in the MLAC, whilst the latter
rectified the fact that the 1995 and 1996 Extradition Convention
pre-dated the incorporation of the Schengen Acquis into the EU
Treaties. This mandate was subsequently amended to include the
2001 Protocol to the MLAC. In relation to extradition, Norway
and Iceland also declared a wish to participate in the EAW, which
superceded the extradition arrangements in the 1995 and 1996 Conventions.
The Presidency's negotiations have continued
on this basis over the past two years. It recently sought Member
States' views on a number of outstanding questions, with a view
to finalising the negotiations in the near future, although no
fixed timetable has been set.
In relation to mutual legal assistance, Member
States are content for the provisions of the MLAC and Protocol
to be extended to Norway and Iceland in their entirety, and the
few outstanding issues, relating to the procedural articles of
the Agreements rather than the substance, have largely been resolved.
However, negotiations on the application of the EAW to Norway
and Iceland are proving more complex.
The Government supports the extension of the
MLA agreements and the EAW to Norway and Iceland in their entirety.
Extension of the MLAC and Protocol to cover Norway and Iceland
will result in more streamlined and uniform mutual legal assistance
arrangements where the same rules will apply to our MLA relations
with all Schengen members. Our own partial participation in Schengen
in any case required some legislative change in order to meet
our commitments to Norway and Iceland under the MLA provisions
of Schengen. We consider full extension of the MLA agreements
to be more practical than operating slightly different systems
for the EU Member States on the one hand and the two non-EU Schengen
states on the other.
The practical arguments are even stronger for.
extension of the EAW by the UK to requests from Norway and Iceland,
in the light of the UK's partial adoption of Schengen. We would
otherwise be operating a distinctly different system of extradition
specifically to cater for the small number of requests from those
two countries.
No further legislative change is required in
order to give effect to the extension of these agreements to Norway
and Iceland. The Crime (International Co-operation) Bill will
enable us to operate the MLAC and Protocol with Norway and Iceland,
and the Extradition Bill will enable the operation of the EAW
system between the UK and those countries. We anticipate that
we shall be able to do this, even if, under the terms of the agreement,
other Member States and Norway/Iceland choose not to operate some
specific EAW provisions in arrangements between themselves.
As is usual in the case of an ongoing negotiation
for an EU third country agreement, the documents are classified
and cannot therefore be deposited for scrutiny. I will however
keep you informed of progress towards finalising the Agreements
over the coming months and will formally deposit the Council Decision
to conclude the Agreement for scrutiny when it becomes available.
8 September 2003
|