NINTH REPORT
By the Select Committee on the Constitution
ORDERED TO
REPORT
THE DRAFT CONSTITUTIONAL TREATY FOR THE
EUROPEAN UNION
Introduction
1. In June 2003, the Convention on the Future of
Europe presented Parts I and II of its work to the European Council
at Thessaloniki. Parts III and IV were presented to the Italian
Presidency in July. Together, these four parts constitute the
draft Constitutional Treaty for the European Union.
2. The draft Treaty was laid before the UK Parliament
in August 2003 (Cm 5897). We are aware that many aspects of the
draft Treaty have been examined in depth by other committees at
Westminster, particularly the House of Commons European Scrutiny
Committee and the House of Lords European Union Committee. The
European Union Committee has published a large number of reports
considering the draft Treaty article by article and is shortly
to publish a further, overview report. It is our intention that
our report should be read in conjunction with these other reports.
We are also conscious that the draft Treaty is only a starting
pointthe final text has still to be negotiated at the Inter-Governmental
Conference which began on 4th October. Any Treaty would then have
to be incorporated into UK law by a bill subject to the usual
Parliamentary procedures. If such a bill is introduced we will
comment further. In view of the wide public interest in the potential
implications of the draft Treaty, we considered that we should
set out to inform the debate at an early stage, not least to assist
those currently negotiating the Treaty on behalf of the UK.
3. The Committee is of the view that the draft Constitutional
Treaty will, if implemented in UK law, have a constitutional impact
on the United Kingdom. We therefore wrote to the Rt Hon. Peter
Hain MP, the Government's representative to the Convention, to
ask him to set out the Government's view on how the Treaty would
affect the constitution of the United Kingdom (see Appendix 2).
We received a reply from the Foreign Secretary, the Rt Hon. Jack
Straw MP (see Appendix 3).
4. We also issued a Call for Evidence to a number
of academic specialists asking for their views (see Appendix 4).
In response to this, we received memoranda from Professor Anthony
Arnull (University of Birmingham), Professor Rodney Brazier (University
of Manchester), Ms Sionaidh Douglas-Scott (King's College London),
Professor John McEldowney (University of Warwick) and Mr Alan
Trench (The Constitution Unit, University College London). All
the evidence we received is published with this Report. Professor
Patrick Birkinshaw also submitted to us a paper that is to be
published separately.[1]
We are indebted to these individuals for their assistance, from
which we have derived both information and insight. We summarise
the main constitutional concerns raised by Professor Arnull, Ms
Douglas-Scott, Professor McEldowney and Mr Trench below. Professor
Brazier's paper deals solely with a specific question relating
to the adoption of the draft European Constitution, namely the
place of the advisory referendum in the process of dealing with
significant constitutional questions in the United Kingdom. We
do not comment on this paper in relation to the draft Treaty.
We have nonetheless printed it as it raises a point of constitutional
significance to which we may wish to return in a future report.
The scope of the draft
Constitutional Treaty
5. We first draw attention to some of the most prominent
provisions in the Draft Treaty, although such an outline inevitably
passes over very many matters of practical importance.
6. Although the avowed purpose of the draft Treaty
is to prepare a Constitution for the European Union, the legal
status of the document, if and when it is signed and ratified
by the member States of the Union, will remain that of a treaty
at international law. It is by means of treaties that the structure,
composition aims and objects of all international organisations
are determined.
7. One aim of the draft Treaty is to re-organise
and present in an accessible form the present provisions which
in a most complex way, explained by the history of the European
Union, govern the activities of the Union. Furthermore, the framers
of the draft Treaty have included many provisions which in various
ways change the structure of the Union, change the working of
the Union organs, and modify the links between the Union and the
democracies of Europe.
8. Title I of Part I of the draft Treaty deals with
the definition and objectives of the Union. By Article I-5 (relations
between the Union and the Member States) the Union shall "respect
the national identities of the Member States, inherent in their
fundamental structures, political and constitutional" and
shall "respect their essential State functions"; the
Union and the Member States shall "in full mutual respect,
assist each other in carrying out tasks which flow from the Constitution".
Article I-6 confers legal personality upon the Union.
9. In Title II of Part 1, Article I-7 requires the
Union to recognise the fundamental rights contained in the Charter
of Fundamental Rights, which forms Part II of the Constitution.
Article I-8 provides that every national of a Member State shall
be a citizen of the Union (additional to his or her national citizenship),
and sets out the rights which citizens of the Union shall enjoy.
10. In Title III of Part 1, Article I-9(1) provides
that "the limits of Union competences are governed by the
principle of conferral", and that the use of those competences
is governed by the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.
By Article I-9(2), the principle of conferral is explained, namely
that the Union shall act within the limits of the powers conferred
on it by the Member States: "Competences not conferred upon
the Union in the Constitution remain with the Member States".
Provision is made by Article I-9(3) and by the Protocol on the
Role of the National Parliaments in the European Union for a procedure
informing all national parliaments of the Commission's legislative
proposals and enabling national parliaments to submit their views
on whether a legislative proposal complies with the principle
of subsidiarity.
11. In Title III of Part I, by Article I-10, "The
Constitution, and law adopted by the Union's institutions in exercising
competence conferred on it, shall have primacy over the law of
the Member States". Member States are to take all appropriate
measures to ensure fulfilment of obligations flowing from the
Constitution.
12. Articles I-11-16 deal with the categories of
competence that the Constitution contemplates; these include exclusive
competence (as to which only the Union may legislate) in respect
of establishing the competition rules necessary for the internal
market, monetary policy (for those Member States that have adopted
the euro), common commercial policy, customs union and the conservation
of marine biological resources under the common fisheries policy.
Areas of shared competence are specified in Article I-13, and
another category of supporting, coordinating or complementary
action is set out in Article I-16. Article I-14 deals with the
coordination of economic and employment policies. By Article
I-15, the Union's competence in matters of common foreign and
security policy covers all areas of foreign policy and all questions
relating to the Union's security which might lead to a common
defence. Article I-17 (Flexibility clause) provides a procedure
by which necessary powers additional to those conferred by the
Constitution may be obtained by a procedure that requires a unanimous
decision by the Council of Ministers.
13. The Union's Institutional Framework is governed
by Title IV, chapter 1 of Part 1. That framework comprises the
European Parliament, the European Council, the Council of Ministers,
the European Commission and the Court of Justice. By Article
I-21, the European Council shall by qualified majority elect a
President, for a term of two and a half years, renewable once,
who may not hold a national mandate and whose office replaces
the existing arrangement for a rotating President held for six
months. In relation to the European Council and the Council of
Ministers, Article I-24(1) provides that voting by qualified majority
shall in general require a majority that consists of the majority
of Member States, representing at least three fifths of the population
of the Union; in certain cases, the required qualified majority
shall consist of two thirds of the Member States, representing
at least three fifths of the population of the Union. New provision
is made for the composition of the European Commission (Articles
I-25 and 26), including the new post of Union Minister for Foreign
Affairs (Article I-27), who as one of the Vice-Presidents of the
Commission would be responsible for handing the Union's external
relations.
14. By title V, chapter 1, there is set out a modified
hierarchy of legal instruments of the Union, namely "European
laws, European framework laws, European regulations, European
decisions, recommendations and opinions". Of these, a "European
law" would replace the existing category of regulations;
a "European framework law" would replace the existing
category of directive (with some modification); and the category
of "European regulations" would be new. Article I-35
provides for a new category of "Delegated regulations".
15. Title V, chapter 2, makes specific provision
for measures implementing the common foreign and security policy
(Article I-39), the common security and defence policy (Article
I-40), and the area of freedom, security and justice (Article
I-41) and also provides for the Union and Member States to "act
jointly in a spirit of solidarity" if a Member State is the
victim of terrorist attack or natural or man-made disaster.
16. Title VI (The Democratic Life of the Union) contains
a group of Articles dealing with principles of representative
and participatory democracy, the social partners and social dialogue,
the European Ombudsman, the observance of transparency by Union
institutions and the protection of personal data.
17. Title IX (Union Membership) provides procedure
for the admission of additional Member States that respect the
values referred to in Article I-2. Article I-58 establishes means
of suspending a State from Union membership rights, when there
is a clear risk of a serious breach of those values. Article I-59
makes provision for voluntary withdrawal from the Union by any
Member State.
18. Part II of the draft Treaty contains the Charter
of Fundamental Rights of the Union, which is to be observed by
all Union institutions, bodies and agencies, and by Member States
"when they are implementing Union law" (Article II-51(1)).
The Charter "does not extend the field of application of
Union law beyond the powers of the Union or establish any new
power or task of the Union" (Article II-51(2)). It is intended
that rights under the Charter which correspond to rights protected
by the European Convention on Human Rights shall be interpreted
in an equivalent manner (Article II-52(3)).
19. Part III of the Treaty contains more detailed
provisions that give effect to the policies and functioning of
the Union (for example, the establishment of the internal market
by chapter 1, section 1, and the free movement of persons and
services by chapter 1, section 2). In respect of economic and
monetary policy, chapter II distinguishes where necessary between
Member States that have adopted the euro and those that have not.
20. In Chapter IV of Part III, Article III-158(1)
provides for the Union to constitute "an area of freedom,
security and justice with respect for fundamental rights, taking
into account the different legal traditions and systems of the
Member States". This Chapter deals with important areas
of public policy, including policies on border checks, asylum
and immigration (Section 2), judicial co-operation in civil matters
(Section 3), judicial co-operation in criminal matters (Section
4) and police co-operation (Section 5).
21. Title V of Part III (The Union's External Action)
deals in Chapter II with the Union's common foreign and security
policy and in Chapter IV with co-operation with third countries
and humanitarian aid.
22. Title VI of Part III (The Functioning of the
Union) contains many provisions that are to govern the composition
and working of the Union's institutions, including the European
Parliament (Articles III-232-243), the Commission (Articles III-250-257),
and the jurisdiction and procedures of the Court of Justice (Articles
III-258-289).
23. Part IV (General and Final Provisions) provides,
among other things, for the repeal of earlier European treaties
once the Treaty establishing the Constitution has come into force
(Article IV-2), for the geographical scope of the Treaty (Article
IV-4) and for a procedure by which provisions of the Treaty may
be amended: subject to the convening of a special Convention or
a conference: any amendments will require to be ratified by all
the Member States (Article IV-7). By Article IV-9, the Treaty
establishing the Constitution shall be concluded "for an
unlimited period".
Constitutional concerns
24. It is inevitably very difficult in reviewing
such a draft document to select matters that will have a particular
impact on the operation of the United Kingdom constitution, but
the following are among the matters to which the papers submitted
to us draw attention. Subject to the work of other Parliamentary
Committees, we may give further consideration to these at a later
date.
(1) The significance
of (a) the express provision for the primacy of the Constitution
and of European Union law generally (Article I-10(1));[2]
(b) the express confirmation that powers not conferred on the
Union remain with Member States (Article I-9(2)); and (c) the
proposed duty of the Union to respect the national identities
of the Member States (Article I-5(1));
(2) The impact and likely effect of the new provision
for the division of powers (exclusive competence, shared competence,
and supporting, coordinating or complementary action) between
the Union and Member States; and the limitation on national legislation
that would arise where the Union has taken action in an area of
shared competence or supporting action (Articles I-12,13 and 16);
(3) The extent to which the use of European framework
laws would be likely to differ from the present directives, with
regard both to the exercise of national discretion and the established
doctrine of direct effect in European law;
(4) The effect of the new formulae for qualified
majority voting on the ability of United Kingdom bodies to influence
decisions of the European Union;
(5) The effect upon the authority of United Kingdom
institutions of the proposals for extending decision-making by
qualified majority voting into new areas;
(6) The effect upon United Kingdom institutions
of the proposals for (a) the Presidency of the European Council
and the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs, and (b) the modified
composition of the Commission;
(7) The effect upon United Kingdom institutions
of the new competences of the Union in relation to the common
foreign and security policy (Article I-15) and the area of freedom,
security and justice, and the provision for qualified majority
voting in these areas;
(8) The effect on the United Kingdom Parliament
of the proposed 'early warning decision system' whereby notice
will be given to national parliaments of legislative proposals
with a period of six weeks being allowed for views to be submitted
by national and devolved parliaments on the principle of subsidiarity
(Article I-9(3) and the Protocol on the Application of the Principles
of Subsidiarity and Proportionality);
(9) The future status and effects of the Charter
of Fundamental Rights;
(10) The impact on the system of criminal justice
within the United Kingdom of Chapter III on Justice and Home Affairs,
which makes it possible for EU measures in this area to have direct
effect (currently not the case) as well as increasing the EU's
powers in the criminal law field;
(11) The impact on the system of criminal justice
within the United Kingdom of the proposals for European action
in respect of serious crime, including the creation of a European
Public Prosecutor (Article III-175) and other measures relating
to cross-border crime;
(12) The effect of the designation of the draft
Treaty as a constitution, and whether this will (a) have
a material effect on the future development of the European Union;
(b) necessarily mean that future developments will result
in a weakening in the authority of the national constitutions
of Member States; and (c) subject the constitution of the United
Kingdom, which is essentially unwritten, to greater pressures
for change than the constitutional arrangements of other major
European states.
(13) The issue of whether the European Communities
Act 1972 will continue to be recognised as the legal mechanism
by which European Union law has effect within the United Kingdom;
and whether continuing development in the European Union will
have material effects upon the constitutional doctrine of the
sovereignty of Parliament;
(14) The effect of procedures and powers in the
draft Treaty upon the devolved organs of government in Scotland,
Wales and Northern Ireland; upon the relations of these bodies
with the United Kingdom Government; and upon the position of local
government in the United Kingdom; and
(15) The proposals for withdrawal by a Member
State from the Union (Article I-59), and for amendment of the
proposed Treaty (Article IV-7), and whether they materially affect
consideration of the impact of the Treaty on the United Kingdom
constitution.
25. We draw attention to these aspects of the
draft Constitutional Treaty for the European Union as raising
issues of principle relating to principal parts of the constitution
of the United Kingdom.
1 'A Constitution for the European Union? - A Letter
from Home', European Public Law vol. 10(1) 2004 (forthcoming). Back
2
This is one of several matters currently under consideration by
Sub-Committee E of the House of Lords European Union Committee. Back
|