APPENDIX 4
Letter from the Rt Hon Dr Jack Cunningham
MP, Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, to Lord Phillips
of Ellesmere KBE FRS, Chairman,House of Lords Select Committee
on Science and Technology
Thank you for your letter of 24 June, seeking
this Department's considered response in due course to the issues
raised by your predecessor, Lord Selborne, in his letters of 11
March to the then Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
and Secretary of State for Scotland. I was also grateful for your
kind congratulations on my appointment.
The Fourth Report for 1996-97 of the House of
Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology also included
at Appendix 1 copies of Lord Selborne's letters. This letter represents
the Government's reply to those letters and the Committee's report.
The Government is committed to achieving sustainable
management of fisheries based on scientific advice. We fully agree
with the Select Committee that, in order to achieve this, firm
control of fishing effort is required in order to tackle over-fishing
at its source. One of our first announcements on taking office
was therefore that the Government will honour its obligation to
implement the Community's new Multi-Annual Guidance Programme
(MAGP IV). This requires Member States to achieve 30 percent reductions
in effort for stocks at risk of depletion and 20 percent for stocks
which are overfished. Reductions can be achieved by a mix of decommissioning
and effort management measures and it is a high priority for us
to complete our national implementation plan.
The Government also agrees that effective enforcement
is an indispensable condition for any successful fisheries policy.
The Government has firmly committed itself to improving standards
of enforcement both across the Community and within the United
Kingdom. In their exchange of letters at the Amsterdam Summit,
the President of the European Commission gave a firm undertaking
to the Prime Minister that the Commission would be examining improvements
in enforcement and submitting a report to the Council with proposals
as necessary during 1997. We have already implemented tighter
controls for the regulation of the North Sea herring fishery and
announced to Parliament other measures to ensure that our fishing
fleet abides by the rules. These include, subject to clearance
with the Commission, the introduction of a prohibition on the
discarding of stowed fish. I have recently held high level talks
with the leaders of the fishing industry at which John Sewel,
Elliot Morley and I emphasised our determination to address the
problem of blackfish and our intention to bring forward in the
autumn a package of measures further to improve enforcement. Satellite
monitoring will be an important component.
Technical conservation measures also have a
role to play. New EC conservation measures will apply to fixed
nets from the end of 1997 and we have strongly supported the EC
Presidency in giving priority, now that the MAGP IV negotiations
are concluded, to completing negotiations on proposals to improve
the EC technical rules that apply to mobile fishing gear.
Lord Selborne's letter described the key to
securing sustainability as lying in initiatives that seek to protect
regional seas in the first instance. The Government agrees with
this and will maintain active UK participation in the North West
Atlantic Fisheries Organisation, the North East Atlantic Fisheries
Commission and other regional bodies as well, of course, as the
Common Fisheries Policy.
The Government welcomes the progress made at
the Intermediate Ministerial Meeting (IMM) of Fisheries and Environment
Ministers at Bergen in March. Most of the action needed to follow
up the Bergen conclusions has to be taken forward within the framework
of the Common Fisheries Policy, where the responsibility for making
proposals rests with the European Commission. We are therefore
pursuing with the Commission the initiatives they need to take
to implement the IMM conclusions, as well as considering the national
initiatives that we should take. During our Presidency of the
EU in the first half of next year, we envisage reviewing the progress
made in the first year since the IMM.
Lord Selborne drew particular attention to the
state of North Sea cod stocks. It is certainly the case that North
Sea cod stocks are now at "uncharted low levels" and
all fisheries managers are aware of the poor state of these stocks.
Even at these low levels there are still some 400 million individual
cod in the North Sea of one year of age or more and I understand
that the latest scientific information is that there has been
a good recruitment of juvenile cod to the fishery. But this is
no cause to be complacent. We need to have total allowable catches
(TACs) which will help the stock to rebuild as well as ensuring
that there are effective reductions in effort under MAGP IV. We
also need to have technical measures which protect the juvenile
cod. There is a significant problem in doing this because in the
mixed fisheries in the North Sea it is impossible to manage one
stock in isolation.
So far as the technical measures are concerned,
Lord Selborne pointed to the continued use of an EC minimum landing
size that is set significantly below the size at which cod typically
reach sexual maturity. Managers, however, have to recognise the
fact that the "cod" fishery in much of the North Sea
is in fact a mixed cod, haddock and whiting fishery. To set a
minimum landing size at the level Lord Selborne appeared to suggest
would result in by far the largest part of a catch of cod in the
mixed fishery being discarded dead into the sea unless the minimum
mesh sizes of the nets currently in use were also changed. But
if mesh sizes were increased so as to catch cod only at maturity,
it would have a direct impact on the rest of the catch and few
haddock and virtually no whiting would be caught since these are
a smaller bodied species of fish. As a result such mesh sizes
would lead to the economic collapse of most of the UK's North
Sea whitefish fisheries. This is a real (and frustrating) technical
problem with no easy answers. We are continuing to look for solutions
and our fisheries scientists will be meeting their German counterparts
in August to take a new look at it and to try to find a way forward
with this particular aspect of our strategy for protecting the
cod stocks.
There is a great deal to be done to achieve
our objective of sustainable management of fisheries. The Government
has wasted no time in setting about this task and will continue
to give it priority. In doing so, the Government welcomes the
constructive contribution that the Select Committee has made to
raising awareness of the need for action.
22 August 1997
Letter from
Lord Phillips of Ellesmere to the Rt Hon Dr Jack Cunningham MP
Many thanks for your letter of 22 August in
response to this Committee's mini-Report on Sustainable Management
of North Sea Fisheries. It is most encouraging to find that the
new Government shares this Committee's profound concern about
this issue, and I am delighted to see that you share to a large
extent our perception as to the way forward. We are under no illusion
as to the difficulty of making progress in an international matter
of this kind. I will copy your letter to other members of the
Select Committee, and I am sure that we will wish to return to
the matter in due course.
7 October 1997
|