Memorandum by Dr Michael I Shamos
(1) WHAT NEEDS
TO BE
DONE TO
CREATE CONFIDENCE
AND TO
STIMULATE E-COMMERCE?
The major legislative initiatives that are recognized
as having stimulated the growth of e-commerce in the U.S. are:
(i) the deregulation of the telecommunications
industry, which allowed free market forces to deploy capital into
the infrastructure of fiber optic/long distance service, switching
services, and network development.
(ii) Internet Tax Freedom Act (1998), which
provides a moratorium from 1 October 1998-30 September 2001 on:
(iii) the AntiCybersquatting Consumer Protection
Act, 15 U.S.C. $1125(d) (29 November 1999), which:
(v) The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (1986),
which:
Prohibits certain acts affecting
interstate commerce. 18 U.S.C. §1030, such as:
Accessing a protected computer without
authorization to obtain anything of value
Accessing or knowingly transmitting code
that intentionally or recklessly causes damage
Intentional trafficking in passwords
Extortion by threat to a computer
(vi) The Electronic Communications Privacy
Act
"any oral communication uttered by a person
exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not subject
to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation"
interception of wire, oral, or electronic communication
use or disclosure of intercepted communication
(vii) The Digital Millennium Copyright Act
(1998)
Illegality of devices to circumvent copyright
protection
And limits liability of Internet
Service Providers for copyright infringement in their business
role:
Transitory communications
The major initiative from the United Nations
that has occurred:
UNCITRAL Model Law of Electronic
Commerce
(United Nations Commission on International
Trade Law, adopted 1998) which allows:
(2) DOES THE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION'S
DRAFT ACTION
PLAN "EEUROPE:
AN INFORMATION
SOCIETY FOR
ALL" OFFER
A REALISTIC
MEANS OF
PROMOTING E-COMMERCE
IN THE
EU?
(viii) We do not have knowledge of this Plan,
and thus cannot comment.
(3) WILL CODES
OF CONDUCT
AND CO-REGULATION
PROVIDE SUFFICIENT
PROTECTION? IS
THERE A
CASE FOR
INTERVENTION BY
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
AND THE
EU?
(ix) The above evidence from the US Congress
legislative actions suggests that some regulation is needed. A
single EU initiative is suggested, rather than several different
National initiatives.
(4) DO THE
INSTITUTIONS OF
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS,
ON THE
ONE HAND,
AND THE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
THE COUNCIL
OF MINISTERS
AND THE
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
ON THE
OTHER, FUNCTION
WITH SUFFICIENT
FLEXIBLITY AND
COHERENCE TO
PROMOTE THE
EU'S OBJECTIVES
IN THE
FIELD OF
E-COMMERCE?
(x) We do not have knowledge of their actions,
and thus cannot comment.
(5) SHOULD EXISTING
EU INSTITUTIONS' INTERNAL
STRUCTURES BE
CHANGED, OR
NEW ONES
CREATED, TO
IMPROVE POLICY
DEVELOPMENT AND
CO-ORDINATION?
(xi) A single initiative modelled after the
US actions would put the EU e-commerce on par with the US market.
(6) HOW CAN
STRUCTURAL CHANGE
BE BROUGHT
ABOUT FAST
ENOUGH TO
ACCOMMODATE TO
THE GROWTH
OF E-COMMERCE?
(xii) We do not have knowledge of the structures,
and thus cannot comment.
March 2000
|