| Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
Lord Marlesford asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Minister of State, Home Office (Baroness Blatch): Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter to Lord Marlesford from the Director General of the Prison Service, Mr. Derek Lewis, dated 28 June 1995.
Lady Blatch has asked me to reply to your recent question about the escape from custody on 5 June 1995 of Mr. Wayne Black.
The Director of Security, Mr. Richard Tilt, has been instructed to carry out an inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the escape from a secure Metropolitan Police vehicle of two high risk category A prisoners on 5 June. The inquiry will examine all aspects of the incident including the performance of their duties by the escorting staff. There are no plans to publish the report of the internal inquiry.
Lord Braine of Wheatley asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Blatch: No. I understand that the fire was caused by an electrical fault in the bowling alley and spread rapidly through the roof timbers.
Lord Ackner asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Blatch: The review of the law on murder as it relates to the use of lethal force in self-defence or in the prevention of crime which was announced on 24 January is being conducted by Home Office officials in consultation with officials in other departments which have an interest. It will report to my right honourable friend the Home Secretary as soon as officials have been able to examine the issues.
Lord Kennet asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Defence (Lord Henley): The United Kingdom will participate fully in the negotiations which are likely to begin shortly on a convention to ban the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons or other explosive purposes. The coverage of the convention will be a matter for discussion between participating nations. Non-fissile materials such as tritium will not, however, be included.
Lord Kennet asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Henley: Her Majesty's Government continue to work actively for the conclusion of the negotiations for a Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty by the end of 1996. We have made clear that our aim is to establish a comprehensive ban on nuclear-weapon test explosions in the atmosphere, underwater and underground. At the same time we consider that the treaty should not prohibit the UK, in common with the other nuclear-weapon states, from fulfilling its responsibilities to maintain the safety and reliability of its nuclear weapons. The question of the scope of the treaty is yet to be resolved. We are in touch with the US and other member states of the conference on disarmament on a wide range of issues relevant to the CTBT negotiations.
Lord Gainford asked Her Majesty's Government:
Lord Henley: Territorial Army (TA) officers regularly command TA units at lieutenant colonel level, and there are at present 39 TA officers at colonel level in staff appointments. At brigadier level, there is one dedicated TA post at Headquarters Land Command. Following consultation with senior military advisers, we intend that in future suitably qualified TA officers should have the opportunity to be considered for a range of staff and certain command appointments at brigadier level. Specifically, and subject to the availability of candidates
of the appropriate calibre, we shall be establishing a post of Brigadier (TA) Development and Doctrine within the Army's Directorate of Development and Doctrine from 1996, to be filled by a TA officer. We also intend, probably from 1997, and subject again to the availability of suitable candidates, that the post of Director Reserve Forces and Cadets in the Central Staff of the Ministry of Defence, which is at present filled by a regular officer, should be filled by a one-star officer from the volunteer reserves of one of the three Services. I know that this will be welcomed by all reservists as further evidence of our commitment to the Reserve Forces.
Lord Kennet asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Baroness Chalker of Wallasey): We have not discussed this matter with other governments.
Lord Kennet asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey: We are not aware of any military support by the US Government to either the Bosnian or Croatian Government military efforts inconsistent with UN Security Council resolutions.
Lord Braine of Wheatley asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey: Neither the United Nations Population Fund nor the International Planned Parenthood Federation provide assistance for the care of orphans and abandoned children in China. We are not aware of any United Kingdom based organisations providing such assistance. The United Nations system's involvement in the care of children comes under the remit of the United Nations Children Fund.
Lord Braine of Wheatley asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey: We have no reliable information on the matters raised in this question.
Lord Braine of Wheatley asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey: No. The Government are deeply concerned about reports of ill-treatment and neglect of children in Chinese orphanages, but the UN Conference on Women has not been called to address specific issues of this kind in individual countries.
Earl Russell asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Minister of State, Department of Social Security (Lord Mackay of Ardbrecknish): From the launch of the agency in April 1993 to the end of April this year, the agency has recorded over 18,000 reduced benefit directions (RBD) as being issued to the Benefits Agency for them to consider implementing a reduction in benefit. Information on the number of RBDs implemented by the Benefits Agency has been collected since the beginning of last April. This shows that 2,361 RBDs were implemented during that month.
The more specific information requested is not available. However, since launch to the end of April this year, the Child Support Agency considered whether there was good cause not to co-operate with the agency in almost 162,000 cases. The parent with care (PWC) named the absent parent in over 25,800 of those cases. Good cause not to co-operate with the agency was accepted in 73,400 cases and was rejected in 60,500 cases. (These figures do not quite sum to the total as they have been drawn from a variety of sources.)
Although figures are not collected, the majority of PWCs subject to a RBD will not be in employment, but a small number of Family Credit and Disability Working Allowance claimants may be affected.
No information is held on the number of PWCs still receiving benefit or the number imprisoned for criminal offences following the imposition of a RBD.
Viscount Hanworth asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Minister of State, Scottish Office (Lord Fraser of Carmyllie): The beaches near Dounreay were not closed to the public immediately after the explosion in the intermediate level waste disposal shaft in 1977. In their joint report of May 1995 (a copy of which has been placed in the Library) the Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE) and the Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee (RWMAC) indicate that the 1977 explosion was the probable source of radioactive metallic particles
found in the vicinity of the Dounreay Nuclear Establishment, though investigations by the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) and Her Majesty's Industrial Pollution Inspectorate (HMIPI) are continuing. Since 1977, as a result of monitoring, only one radioactive metallic particle has been found on the public beach at Sandside Bay in 1984 and a number of radioactive metallic particles on the Dounreay site and the Dounreay foreshore, to which the public does not have ready access. COMARE concluded in the recent joint report that the chance of an individual member of the public encountering the particles was extremely small. Because of the very low probability of encountering such particles, COMARE was of the opinion, based on the evidence currently available, that while the most active particles could cause acute effects, the metallic particles are most unlikely to explain the observed excess of childhood leukaemia in the Dounreay area.
| Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |