United Kingdom Parliament
Publications & records
Advanced search
 HansardArchivesResearchHOC PublicationsHOL PublicationsCommittees
Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments Twenty-First Report


Appendix 1


Draft Instrument: memorandum from the Cabinet Office


Draft Ministerial and other Salaries Order 2008


This memorandum is submitted by the Cabinet Office to the Committee to assist the Committee in its consideration of the Order.

On reflection, and notwithstanding the position as set out in paragraph 3 of the Explanatory Memorandum which accompanies the Order, we accept that the better argument is that the Order does indeed have retrospective effect. We acknowledge that the effect of the Order is to increase the annual amounts, or where applicable the maximum and minimum amounts of salary (albeit of existing paid Ministers only), with effect from 1st April and 1st November 2007 over and above the increases which arise automatically on the operation of the formula in section 1A of the Ministerial and other Salaries Act 1975. And whilst the additional payments to Ministers resulting from these increases are of course only paid prospectively, we recognise that the better argument is that a wholly prospective Order would have characterised those increases as a lump sum payable to Ministers on the coming into force of the Order (rather than as percentage increases having effect from the above past periods).

The general presumption is of course that delegated powers in enactments are not capable of being exercised retrospectively. We consider that there are a number of factors which weigh against that presumption in this case.

Firstly, some backdating of salary increases is now common practice. This is the case particularly in the public sector, as a result of the timings of negotiated pay settlements. This practice has been reflected in previous Orders concerning Ministerial salaries - the Ministerial and other Salaries Order 2001[1] and the Attorney General's Salary Order 2000[2], neither of which was drawn to the attention of both Houses by the Committee.

Secondly, we fully accept that if the Order were to have decreased salaries retrospectively that would have been outside the powers conferred in the Act. The provision in this Order however, is for limited salary increases. Therefore, no Minister will suffer a detriment as a result of the Order. And indeed Ministers have an expectation that they will receive these increases as they were announced in the Written Ministerial Statement following the publication on 16th January 2008 of the Report of the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) on Parliamentary pay, pensions and allowances.

Finally, the Order provides expressly that any increases are only capable of being paid to those Ministers who hold a paid office at the time when the Order comes into force. This ensures that any additional salary which is paid falls within the salary limits set down in Schedule 1 to the Act.

For the above reasons we consider that to the extent that the Order is retrospective this is within the powers of section 1B of the Act.

If the Committee were minded to draw the Order to the attention of both Houses on the ground that it purports to have retrospective effect where the parent statute confers no express authority so to provide, we would not wish to take advantage of any further opportunity to provide explanation.

Cabinet Office

6 June 2008



1  S.I.No.3502. Back

2  S.I.No.1827. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 13 June 2008