Appendix
S.I. 2008/1085: memorandum from the Department
for Communities and Local Government
Standards Committee (England) Regulations 2008
(S.I. 2008/1085)
1. The Committee has requested a memorandum on the
following points
(1) The indentation of the subdivisions in these
Regulations (both in the copies supplied to the Committee and
in the published version) does not conform to the usual format.
Explain how this was allowed to happen and whether the Department
intends to arrange for the issue of a correctly formatted replacement.
1. The Regulations were made using the new Version
6.0 of the Statutory Instrument Template which applied the indentations
as they appear in the printed version laid before Parliament.
The HTML version of the Regulations accessed on the following
link http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi_20081085_en_1
does not appear to contain any of the abnormal indentations. The
Department has raised the problem with the Stationery Office and
will inform the Committee of any developments. The Department
does not regard it as necessary to take any further steps in view
of the likelihood that most users of the Regulations will access
them via the Office of Public Sector Information's website or
other commercial publications.
(2) The term "appointment" in regulation
5(1) appears clearly to mean the act of appointing a person to
a role when read with sub-paragraphs (a) and (c). When read with
sub-paragraph (b), is the term intended to mean an indication
of the fact that applications are invited from people wishing
to be appointed? If so, what is the justification for using a
single term with two different meanings?
1. Regulation 5(1) contains three criteria which
must be met before an appointment as an independent member of
a local authority's standards committee may be effective. The
appointment (in the sense of the act of appointing a person) is
valid only if each of those criteria in the three sub-paragraphs
are fulfilled and to this extent the Department would submit that
the word "appointment" bears the same meaning when read
in conjunction with each sub-paragraph. Similar wording contained
in regulation 4 of the Relevant Authorities (Standards Committee)
Regulations 2001 (SI 2001 No. 2812) has operated in relation to
the appointment of independent members to Standards Committees
without apparent difficulty for the past seven years. However,
we take the point that it might be more helpful to the reader
if it were made clearer what it is that has to be advertised in
relation to sub-paragraph (b) and will bear this in mind in any
future revisions of these Regulations.
1. The Standards Board for England has issued guidance
to relevant authorities on the rules relating to the size and
composition of standards committees, including the appointment
of independent members of standards committees. The guidance,
which is available at http://www.standardsboard.gov.uk/Guidance/Standardscommittees/Therole
andmake-upofstandardscommittees/filedownload,16605,en.pdf,
makes clear that the position of independent member must be advertised
in at least one newspaper circulating in the area of a relevant
authority before an appointment as independent member may be made.
Department for Communities and Local Government
13th May 2008
|