Memorandum by Choice for All Doncaster
We are a User Forum called ChAD (choice for
all in Doncaster).
Our committee consists of 20 adults with learning
disabilities, who meet monthly to find out what is happening around
them which may have an impact on their lives, and to voice any
concerns of theirs or the 700 people they represent.
At our recent meeting we discussed your questions
on Human rights and collectively as a group the following feelings
and opinions were obtained. (The other enclosed sheets are what
various groups and individuals have forwarded to us).[2]
1. Experiences of using services like health
services, education, and housing and welfare benefits.
BAD EXPERIENCES
WITH DOCTORS
WERE:
1. That many did not speak to the individual
but to their carer/support.
2. That they felt patronised by the way
they spoke to them i.e., like children.
3. Big words were used that they did not
understand.
4. They had not arrived when they had been
told they would visit on a home appointment (resulting in one
elderly lady having to ring an ambulance for her husband).
5. Waiting long time for hospital appointment,
having sleepless nights worrying about their condition as they
knew something serious was happening but no one explained things.
6. Dentists were also a problem for some
people with them not being able to access a service. One lady
was alarmed when the tools were unclean.
GOOD EXPERIENCES
WERE:
1. Support has been given to people to fill
in forms or they did not have to complete them.
2. Reassurance given by nurses when having
injections.
3. Health day services offered a good interesting
variety of activities.
4. For the individuals who had "health
action plans", they felt it helped them.
The group stated that they would like the following:
(a) treated as adults
(b) given information
(c) explain and speak clearly
HOUSING
1. Many people felt that they had to wait
far too long to be re-housed (whether it be through ill health
or incompatibility of the fellow residents.
2. What was particularly frustrating for
most was the lack of Support workers; many had turned to Advocacy
to help them after the situation had become critical.
3. Not able to live where they want and
don't have a choice who with.
BENEFITS
1. Hardly anyone had any knowledge what
benefits they received as it was controlled by their family or
staff.
RELATIONSHIPS
1. Approximately a third of the group stated
that they had a partner, however only one of these (who lived
independently) saw her partner outside of the day centre environment.
2. Some people were not allowed a partner
(parental/carer control).
3. Several of the group stated that they
would love to live in the community with a partner with support.
4. One person stated that they did have
a partner who they saw occasionally when staffing levels permitted.
The general feeling was that there was a lot
more support required to enable anyone to have a "proper"
relationship.
TAKING PART
IN THE
COMMUNITY
Some people did have support workers, however
could not go out spontaneously, as support had to be booked for
week in advance.
2. A big issue is for people who
live in a residential setting who go out for the evening to pub,
etc and have to be returning back at about 9 pm so the staff member
can finish their shift at 10 pm.
3. Again very much controlled by availability
of carers/staff.
4. Some people in independent living (with
minimal support) are told what time they have to return from the
pub and that they can only drink alcohol at weekends.
5. One male member stated that he thought
it was particularly difficult for black and ethnic minorities
(people with learning disabilities) when out in the community
as they don't just get stared at but also get racist abuse.
HOW EASY
IS IT
TO HAVE
A SAY
IN MAKING
DECISIONS WHAT
AFFECT YOU
1. People stated that they felt they were
able to make decisions at ChAD. Advocacy, and the Social education
centres.
HOW EASY
IS IT
FOR PEOPLE
TO COMPLAIN
ABOUT A
SERVICE
1. Some people did not have any knowledge
of how to complain but they knew who to. (We are holding a forum
shortly with someone from C.S.C.I in attendance to explain).
2. Some were afraid to complain.
3. Others complained to staff but felt that
they were thought badly of particularly if it was regarding a
member of staff.
4. Some people said they complained but
it took ages for anyone to listen.
5. Several suggestions of who to complain
to were, Advocacy, Key workers and the Citizens Advice Bureau.
EXAMPLES OF
HUMAN RIGHTS
WORKING WELL
1. Many people said that Advocacy had helped
them to achieve what they wanted and ChAD had given them choices
and information.
2. Person Centred Plans were good and helped
to have their voices heard.
3. The general feeling was that an interpreter
and/or Maketon would be helpful for some people.
4. Everyone agreed that declaration and
convention on the rights of people with learning disabilities
would be very helpful.
2 Not printed. Back
|