United Kingdom Parliament
Publications & records
Advanced search
 HansardArchivesResearchHOC PublicationsHOL PublicationsCommittees
Joint Committee On Human Rights Seventh Report


9  CONCLUSIONS: PUTTING HUMAN RIGHTS PRINCIPLES INTO PRACTICE

The test of Government policy has to be the experiences of citizens we are trying to support.

Mr Ivan Lewis, MP, Minister for Care Services[440]

293. In the course of our recent inquiries on the treatment of asylum seekers and the human rights of older people in healthcare, we have raised our concerns about the lack of respect afforded to the human rights of the some of the most marginalised and vulnerable members of our society. In the course of this inquiry, these concerns have intensified. The evidence reveals that adults with learning disabilities continue to face a high level of prejudice and discrimination, ranging from patronising behaviour to criminal assaults. This is unacceptable.

294. In this report, we have made a number of recommendations to the Government, to health and social care inspectorates, to the Equality and Human Rights Commission and others. Our recommendations are based on our view that there is an urgent need for stronger leadership to create a more positive culture of respect for human rights in the United Kingdom.

295. Although we accept that there is a lot of work to be done with the general population to promote a rights based culture, we have been deeply disappointed in the course of this inquiry by the low level of awareness of human rights principles and of the Human Rights Act 1998 among not only adults with learning disabilities, their carers and supporters, but also among those who work in the field and at the heart of local and central Government. Although we were impressed by the passion for a human rights based approach expressed by the Minister for Care Services and the Minister for Disabled People, we are persuaded that real change for adults with learning disabilities will only happen if practical steps are taken to promote a more positive approach to the rights of adults with learning disabilities on the ground, in mainstream public services.

296. However, this practical approach, using the Human Rights Act 1998, and the Disability Discrimination Act (as amended), to improve and encourage best practice in service delivery should not undermine the binding nature of these important statutory obligations. Public authorities should never be allowed to treat their duties towards adults with learning disabilities under the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Disability Discrimination Act (including their positive duties under the Disability Equality Duty) as optional.

The role of Government

297. We welcome the commitment of Government to increased choice and participation for adults with learning disabilities in Valuing People and Valuing People Now (and by the regional and devolved administrations in each of the equivalent policy papers in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland). We are, however, disappointed by the lack of strong leadership shown by central Government in the implementation of these policies in a way which ensures the fundamental rights of adults with learning disabilities are respected. We welcome the very positive work of the Office of the National Director and his colleagues in the Valuing People Support Team; but we are anxious about the clear evidence that this work, and the aims of Government policy, are being undermined by a failure to pay serious attention to both Valuing People and the wider rights of adults with learning disabilities in other Government departments and in mainstream public service delivery.

298. The National Co-Director for Learning Disabilities described the process of engaging other Government departments in the implementation of Valuing People, as a "process of dialogue and negotiation" with other departments, to persuade them that making provision for adults with learning disabilities in their mainstream policies was a priority.[441] On the one hand, the Minister for Care Services told us that the creation of the Office of Disability Issues and the Life Chances Ministerial Group meant that the disability agenda was "uniquely" being "driven across Government".[442] Yet, on the other, he told us that even within his own Department, he had found it a "struggle" to get the mainstream NHS to take the needs of adults with learning disabilities seriously.[443] The Government should provide consistent leadership on the need to respect the human rights of adults with learning disabilities. Valuing People Now recognises the increased work by other Departments in meeting the needs of adults with learning disabilities (for example, work by the Home Office on criminal justice issues), which we welcome, but we are concerned that there has been only limited evidence of constructive joint-working by Government on these issues so far.

299. We recognise that in most instances, principal responsibility for meeting the needs of adults with learning disabilities will be with service providers, either in local authorities, or PCTs. With this in mind, we were particularly concerned by the evidence that, for many, change has been slow and progress undermined by limited resources at a local level, despite the Government's lofty and admirable aims to promote independent living and the rights of adults with learning disabilities. For example, when we asked the National Co-Director for Learning Disabilities about consistent implementation of Valuing People, he told us:

    There is a great difference between authorities … there are even great differences within authorities, because if we remember that the Valuing People agenda is a cross-Government agenda, what you can often find, even amongst the better authorities, is some really innovative progress in one area, maybe about access to mainstream healthcare, but maybe not doing much around access to paid work.[444]

300. We asked the Minister for Care Services and the Minister for Disabled People about the introduction of new Public Service Agreement on Equalities and Social Exclusion, and the balance between local and central responsibility for implementation of policies on learning disabilities. We welcome the Minister's recognition that "to achieve real change you need to empower far more the professionals on the frontline" and his commitment not to "stop challenging the system when I believe it is fundamentally failing in its basic obligations to … people with learning disabilities".[445]

301. We urge the Department of Health and the Office for Disability Issues to consider opportunities for joint-working to meet the aims of Valuing People and Valuing People Now. As part of this process, we recommend the amendment of Valuing People Now, to remind all public authorities, including Government Departments, local authorities and NHS Trusts, that the aim of the Government's policy is grounded both in the need to respect the human rights of adults with learning disabilities, and in the binding obligations of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Disability Discrimination Act (as amended). We consider that this would send a strong message to mainstream services that implementation of this policy is not optional.

The role of the Equality and Human Rights Commission

302. In the course of this inquiry, we have considered a number of positive steps taken by the former Disability Rights Commission to highlight inequalities faced by adults with learning disabilities, not least in the work of the DRC Formal Inquiry Panel on health inequalities. We were impressed by the evidence of Eve Rank, the Disability Rights Commissioner and Chair of the DRC Learning Disability Action Group.

303. The Equality and Human Rights Commission, which assumed the responsibilities of the DRC in October 2007, is newly established and is in the process of setting longer term goals and priorities. We intend to take oral evidence from the Commission during 2008 on its early work and emerging priorities. However, we consider that the Equality and Human Rights Commission has a crucial role to play in the creation of a broad culture of human rights. It has an important general duty to work "to ensure mutual respect between groups based on … shared respect for equality and human rights"[446] and a specific duty to "promote awareness, understanding and protection of human rights".[447] In the course of this inquiry, we have learnt that the best way to improve respect for the human rights of adults with learning disabilities, is to involve them in the work done to help, support and empower them. We encourage the Equality and Human Rights Commission to ensure that it monitors the performance of the Government and other public bodies in relation to the treatment of adults with learning disabilities, and take steps, including through active involvement with their statutory Disability Committee or otherwise, to ensure that adults with learning disabilities play a central role in its work and that their views and voices are heard.


440   Q 154. Back

441   Q 133. Back

442   Q 157. Back

443   Q 158. Back

444   Q 123. Back

445   Q 171. Back

446   Equality Act 2006, Section 3. Back

447   Equality Act 2006, Section 9. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 6 March 2008