United Kingdom Parliament
Publications & records
Advanced search
 HansardArchivesResearchHOC PublicationsHOL PublicationsCommittees
Joint Committee On Human Rights Twenty-First Report



Annex 1: Pre-Charge Detention: Six Key Safeguards Compared

Safeguard

Counter-Terrorism Bill (after potential Government amendments)

Civil Contingencies Act

JCHR Proposal

1. "Emergency" threshold

Exceptional operational need in relation to a specific investigation due to exceptional circumstances, e.g. multiple plots or a grave terrorist emergency [63]

Terrorism which threatens serious damage to the security of the UK[64]

Public emergency threatening the life of the nation[65]

2. Parliamentary scrutiny

(1) Approval by both Houses within 7 days[66]

(2) Parliamentary debate circumscribed by need to avoid prejudice to future trials[67]

(1) Approval by both Houses within 7 days[68]

(2) Parliamentary debate circumscribed by need to avoid prejudice to future trials[69]

(1) Approval by both Houses within 7 days

(2) Full parliamentary debate on

(a) whether public emergency exists

(b) whether extension to 42 days "strictly required" by the emergency

(c) whether extension consistent with other international obligations

3. Judicial review of extension

Judicial review of Secretary of State's view that:[70]

(1) extension is needed for purposes of investigation giving rise to exceptional operational need;

(2) need for extension is urgent;

(3) power is compatible with Article 5 ECHR

Judicial review of Secretary of State's view:[71]

(1) that extension to 42 days is appropriate for purpose of preventing, controlling or mitigating an aspect or effect of the emergency;

(2) that effect of extension is in due proportion to that aspect or effect of emergency;

(3) compatibility with Article 5 ECHR.

Judicial review of whether derogation objectively justified:

(1) whether public emergency threatening life of the nation exists;

(2) whether extension to 42 days "strictly required" by the emergency;

(3) whether extension to 42 days consistent with UK's other international obligations.

4. Judicial safeguards for individual (at applications for extension)

Review by a judge but no additional judicial safeguards, so current law applies:[72]

(1) suspect and legal representative can be excluded from part of hearing;

(2) information can be provided to judge but withheld from suspect and legal representative;

(3) no provision for special advocates

None specified in Act; left to emergency regulations (drafts not published)

Fully judicial hearing with full procedural rights for suspect and right to be represented by special advocate at any closed hearing[73]

5. Duration

30 days[74]

30 days (or earlier if specified in emergency regulations)[75]

30 days

6. Parliamentary review

Statutory reviewer to report to Secretary of State on

(1) operation of legislation

(2) each individual case

None in Act itself; Government commitment to Parliament to appoint senior Privy Councillor to carry out review of operation of the Act within one year of any use of emergency powers; report to be published and therefore available to Parliament[76]

(1) Panel of independent reviewers

(2) reporting directly to Parliament on operation of extended pre-charge detention

(3) at least one month before parliamentary debate on renewal

(4) Annual report by Secretary of State also one month before debate

(5) Secretary of State to report to Parliament on appointment process of independent reviewers and report to be approved by both Houses

 

 

 

 


63   Possible Government amendment (Bill currently provides for "exceptional operational need" threshold without further definition). Back

64   CCA 2004 s. 19(1)(c). Back

65   Article 15(1) ECHR, as elaborated in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. Back

66   Possible Government amendment to new para 45(2) of Schedule 8 to the Terrorism Act 2000 (Bill currently provides for approval by each House within 30 days). Back

67   As acknowledged by proposed new para. 44(5) of Schedule 8 to Terrorism Act 2000 (Secretary of State's statement to Parliament must not include any details of person detained or any material that might prejudice the prosecution of any person). Back

68   CCA 2004 s. 27(1)(b). Back

69   As acknowledged by the DPP in evidence to the Home Affairs Committee: House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, First Report of Session 2007-08, The Government's Counter-Terrorism Proposals, Vol. II, HC 43-II, Ev 88, Q580, pointing out the risk to a fair trial where the order made to extend the period in respect of a particular case has to be approved both Houses of Parliament after a debate. Back

70   Proposed new para. 41(3) of Schedule 8 to Terrorism Act 2000. Back

71   CCA 2004, s. 23(1). Back

72   Paras 33 and 34 of Schedule 8 to the Terrorism Act 2000. Back

73   Under JCHR's proposed amendment to Schedule 8 to the Terrorism Act 2000: see Second Report on Counter-Terrorism Bill, at para. 13. Back

74   Possible Government amendment (Bill currently provides for reserve power to cease after 60 days: proposed new para. 45(1) of Schedule 8 to the Terrorism Act 2000). Back

75   CCA 2004, s. 26(1). Back

76   HC Deb 18 November 2004 col.s 1509-1510 (Ruth Kelly MP). Back

 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 9 June 2008