HO
19
Memorandum
submitted by Professor Vincent Marks
Government policy on licensing
of homeopathic products
1 Homeopathic products have no place in
a society and more especially a National Health Service that aims to protect
people from unnecessary harm arising whether due to ignorance or misfeance.
Homeopathy has no justification for continuing to exist in a world where
medical practice is a craft that relies upon the basic sciences of anatomy,
physiology, pathology, pharmacology and psychology and demands evidence of
efficacy.
2 Homeopathy has none of these
attributes and whilst it may have been justified because when inaugurated
because it fullfilled one of the prime maximes of medical practice namely, "First do no harm.." which was in sharp contrast
to much of orthodox medical practice at the time, it no longer is so.
3 Homeopathy
produces harm, in my experience and in numerous published reports,not by
commission but by omission, and by the denial of access to remedies of proven
benefit. Licensing homeopathic remedies
gives them a credibility they do not deserve or warrant from either a
pragmatic or philosophical point of view.
Government policy on the
funding of homeopathy through the NHS
4 Evidence based medical practice should
not have to compete for funds with what can legitimately be described as a cult
practice based upon nothing than unsubstantiated dogma.
5 This has repeatedly been shown,
through fair trials, to provide no benefits beyond those achievable by diligent
use of the placebo effect whose adantages cannot be used to full effect by
practioners of modern medicine.
6 Registered
Medical Practioners are ethically bound to explain to their patients the
scientific basis of treatments they recommend and both the desirable and
undesirable consequences of it.
The evidence base
on homeopathic products and services
7 I am not aware of any genuine evidence
base for homeopathy whose philosophy flies in the face of all known physical,
chemical and biological science.
8 The proposition that "like cures like"
was a preposterous proposition based on nothing more profound than the
imagination of its author.
9 Properly conducted randomised
controlled clinical trials of homeopathy (fair trials) have not established any
benefit greater than can be achieved by placebo therapy and that cannot be
explained by chance.
10 Claims that animals respond to
homeopathy do not withstand scrutiny but are often attested to as pragmatic
evidence for the efficacy of homeopathy in spite of its implausibility.
By Vincent Marks, MA, DM,FRCPath, FRCP (Edin & Lond)
November 2009
|