Appendix 2 - Response from Parliamentary
Secretary, Cabinet Office
We call on the Government to address this point
of principle: that it is unacceptable and incompatible with genuine
independence for the ethical regulators, which were created to
regulate government, to be appointed by government and funded
by government. We therefore urge the Government to adopt a coherent
and principle-based approach to ethical regulation that is designed
to secure the independence of ethical regulators from the Executive.
(Paragraph 6)
Thank you for the Public Administration Select Committee's
Further Report on Ethics and Standards, published in response
to my letter to you of 25 November. I would like to respond to
the issues raised in the Further Report.
The Government is also committed to a system of ethical
regulation which operates independently of Government. The Government
is therefore pleased to see that the Committee believes all of
the ethical regulators have demonstrated their ability to act
robustly and autonomously. The Government is therefore not persuaded
that the imposition of a uniform structure and status for all
of the ethical regulators is either necessary or desirable, particularly
as the Committee's recommendation involves creating a whole new
body in the form of a Public Standards Commission. We do not see
how such a body would add value to the work of the ethical regulators.
In its further report, the Committee argues that,
without the ethical regulators having a basis in statute, the
Government could reduce their funding or abolish them if it wished
to do so. The Government does not accept that this is a realistic
possibility. Parliament already takes a close interest in the
operation of regulators, not least through the Public Administration
Select Committee itself. The regulators are able to bring to the
attention of Parliament any concerns they might have about funding
or any other issue relevant to their operation. In addition, the
independence of the regulators in practice will be further strengthened
by the introduction of single non-renewable terms for appointees
to the regulators.
As the Committee said in its recommendation on this
issue, "The reform of ethical regulation is likely to be
a gradual process, which will allow examination and review of
new arrangements". The Government agrees with this approach
and is committed to finding the right arrangements for each individual
circumstance. As ethical regulation evolves, it may be appropriate
for a particular regulator to be placed on a statutory footing,
as the Government is committed to doing in relation to the Civil
Service Commissioners.
In the case of the Civil Service Commissioners, this
is the right thing to do in the particular circumstances. The
Government wants to formalise the constitutional status of our
impartial Civil Service by enshrining its position in statue.
It is therefore entirely consistent and logical to place the Civil
Service Commissioners on a statutory footing also.
However, we do not see this changing the way the
Commissioners operate. The Commissioners already operate independently
of Government and will continue to do so.
There is nothing to suggest that any of the ethical
regulators are currently inhibited from operating independently
of Government. The Government stands by its assertion that their
independence is not in question. As you yourself said during the
debate in the House on 5 December 2007, "the time has come
to recognise explicitly that we have created a system of permanent
ethical regulation
In fact, such bodies are not compromised
in practice; they do excellent work and are robustly independent".
Given acceptance of the ethical regulators as a permanent part
of our political landscape and the recognition that they operate
in a robustly independent way, the Government thinks it advantageous
to retain the flexibility to respond appropriately and quickly
to the particular circumstances faced by each of the regulators.
The contribution of PASC has been enormously helpful
in the evolution of our system for ethical regulation and I hope
we can continue to work together on these issues.
|