Examination of Witnesses (Questions 100-103)
KEVIN BRENNAN
MP
5 FEBRUARY 2009
Q100 Chairman: You would have taken
advice.
Kevin Brennan: I would have.
Q101 Chairman: Who would you have
taken advice from?
Kevin Brennan: From the statisticians
and the civil servants in the department concerned.
Q102 Kelvin Hopkins: Kevin is going
to write to us again with more information as you requested. There
is one sentence in Gus O'Donnell's letter which I find puzzling.
It is the last paragraph on the first page and I shall read it
out: "Although the head of statistics profession for the
NHS Information Centre, supported by Department of Health officials,
refused to sanction the publication of hospital admissions figures,
the Home Office used the figure in the fact sheet following consultation
with a special adviser in No 10, in the belief that concerns of
NHS statisticians had been addressed." Was it the Special
Adviser who told them that their concerns have been addressed
or did someone else tell them they had been addressed or did they
not know in the first place that the NHS statisticians had objected?
It is a bit puzzling that sentence.
Kevin Brennan: That may have to
be the subject of further clarity.
Q103 Chairman: You need to write
what you think is a pretty definitive account of what happened
in this case including these email trails that we have talked
about. We would like to know exactly what sequence of events with
what species of individuals were taking actions that produced
this result. You said you were going to do it so we look forward
to that.
Kevin Brennan: I will do what
I can do, and what I said I would do is on the record.
Chairman: I am sure it will be full enough
to prevent us from calling you back to ask further questions about
it. I am looking forward to a comprehensive letter finding out
what happened. With that, can I say we miss you greatly on this
Committee. You are right: it is much easier to ask the questions
than to answer them but you have done very well. Thank you very
much indeed.
|