Examination of Witnesses (Questions 40-43)
MR PHIL
WOOLAS MP, MR
KEVAN JONES
MP, MS LIN
HOMER AND
MR JOHN
PITT-BROOKE
5 MAY 2009
Q40 Chairman: That is very helpful.
I am very grateful for the way in which you have approached this
evidence session, Mr Woolas. You did say that you will be working
with this Committee in order to try and look at these proposals.
What is your timetable for putting forward the proposals that
you think will demand the support of the House because clearly
that is what you want to do?
Mr Woolas: What I would like to
request of you is that there is a timetable whereby between now
and early June we have an analysis of the statistics. I am conscious
that MPs have been bombarded with claim and counterclaim on the
statistics and on the financial consequences of that. We would
like to share our expertise and offer you the possibility of discussions
with our officials so that you have confidence in the figures
and are aware of the advice that we have been getting. Secondly,
the Home Secretary gave a commitment that we would now consider
the 1,500 outstanding appeals by the end of the month.
Q41 Chairman: That is the end of
May?
Mr Woolas: Yes. We hope we can
do that in order that we can apply the guideline lessons, bearing
in mind Mr Prosser's question about giving guarantees as best
we can not to deport people. Do not think that if somebody fails
under these guidelines we will put them on a plane; we will not.
That will allow us to have the statistics in one place and the
lessons from the review in one place in order that we can then,
with your help, bring proposals to the House before the summer
recess based on the clear view of the House of Commons last Wednesday.
Q42 Chairman: On dealing with the
cases, Ms Homer is obviously delighted that she is getting the
additional resources to process 1,500 cases by the end of May.
Those of us with large immigration caseloads would urge on you,
Minister, giving her even more resources so she does not write
to us every week and say she is not going to be concluding the
legacy cases until 2011. She must be delighted. This is clearly
a priority for the Government. You are saying to this Committee
that by the end of May every outstanding case will be dealt with,
are you?
Ms Homer: I am absolutely happy
to confirm that. There obviously may be some individual cases
where the applicant wants to put information in front of us that
will take them a bit longer. So if somebody wanted time to produce
more medical evidence or things like that we would be flexible,
but we believe we can look at all of those cases by the end of
the month.
Q43 Chairman: So where there is political
will to clear the backlog it certainly seems to happen.
Mr Woolas: We are clearing the
backlog, Chairman. As we report to you regularly, it is getting
much better and the Home Secretary is determined that it will
get even better still.
Mr Jones: The MoD is also keen
to provide its figures and its experts for the Committee to meet
with in a seminar or whatever the Committee wants to do so that
it can go through the figures that I have been given as the Minister
responsible. In the spirit of co-operation both departments would
like to make the offer to do that.
Chairman: I will put it to the Committee
at the end of this session, but I am sure members of the Committee
will want to be working with the Home Office and the Ministry
of Defence in order to make sure that this matter is dealt with.
Provided that the Minister replies to our letters quicker than
the six months it took him to reply to the letter of 4 November,
we are very happy to co-operate. May I thank both the Ministers
and Mr Pitt-Brooke and Ms Homer for coming to give evidence today.
|