11 European Union Special Representative
in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH)
| (30489)
--
| Council Joint Action appointing the European Union's Special Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
| Legal base | Articles 14, 18(5) and 23 (2); QMV
|
| Department | Foreign and Commonwealth Office
|
| Basis of consideration | Minister's letter of 2 April 2009
|
| Previous Committee Report | HC 19-xi (2008-09), chapter 16 (18 March 2009)
|
| Discussed in Council | 11 March 2009
|
| Committee's assessment | Politically important
|
| Committee's decision | Cleared (decision reported on 18 March 2009); further information now provided
|
Background
11.1 The internationally brokered Dayton Peace Agreement ended
the 1992-1995 war in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH).[44]
It established BiH as a state comprising two Entities, each with
a high degree of autonomy: the Republika Srpska (RS) and the Federation
(FBiH).
11.2 The Agreement also designated the Office of
the High Representative (OHR) as the chief civilian peace implementation
agency in BiH, to oversee the implementation of the civilian aspects
of the Peace Agreement on behalf of the international community.
He or she is also tasked with co-ordinating the activities of
the civilian organisations and agencies operating in the Bosnia
and Herzegovina.[45]
11.3 The Peace Implementation Council (PIC)
55 countries and international organisations that sponsor and
direct the peace implementation process oversees these
arrangements. The PIC Steering Board nominates the HR; the UN
Security Council, (which approved the Dayton Agreement and the
deployment of international troops in BiH) then endorses the nomination.
On a day to day basis, a Board of Principals, chaired by the HR,
serves as the main coordinating body. Its permanent members are
OHR, EUFOR, NATO HQ Sarajevo, OSCE, UNHCR, EUPM and the Commission.
International financial institutions such as the World Bank, the
IMF and the UNDP are also regular participants. From the outset
the HR has been "double-hatted" as EU Special Representative
(EUSR).
11.4 The longstanding goal has always been for BiH
to work its way towards European accession. The most recent step
was the signing last June of BiH's Stabilisation and Association
Agreement. Closure of the Office of the High Representative was
provisionally planned for June 2008. However, it was decided that
this decision would be reviewed by the PIC Steering Board in February
2008, and closure would occur only when the political situation
in Bosnia and Herzegovina was judged to be sufficiently stable.
Following closure, the EUSR would become the primary representative
of the international community in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
11.5 Prior to this transition, the BiH authorities
need to deliver five objectives (well established, approved by
the PIC SB and all previously recognized by BiH authorities as
obligations) revolving around creating a sustainable, multi-ethnic,
democratic, law-based State, and to fulfil two conditions
signing of the SAA, and a positive assessment of the situation
in BiH by the PIC SB based on full compliance with the Dayton
Agreement. These "Five Objectives and Two Conditions"
are far from either delivery or fulfilment; on the contrary, the
most recent findings by both the Commission and the PIC have lamented
political developments since last June, with the PIC noting "little
progress in addressing reform, with ethnic and sub-State agendas
prevailing over the European agenda", and that "Divisive
rhetoric challenging the sovereignty and constitutional order
of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), as well as the authority of the
High Representative and the Peace Implementation Council (PIC)
Steering Board has been frequent, further undermining inter-ethnic
trust and the foundations of the state".
11.6 Mr Miroslav Lajcak was appointed as EUSR in
BiH on 18 June 2007 through Council Decision 2007/427/CFSP. At
our meeting on 21 January 2009 we considered draft Council Decisions
extending his and four other EUSR mandates for a further year,
and recommended them for debate.[46]
That debate took place on 2 March 2009.[47]
The Minister's letter of 19 February 2009
11.7 In her letter, the Minister for Europe expressed
gratitude for the discretion the Committee had given her to agree
to the extension of the EUSR's mandate for a further year, notwithstanding
that it and four other such mandates were to be debated on 2 March
in the European Committee. But its main purpose was to explain
that Miroslav Lajcak had recently resigned as HR/EUSR (BiH)
to become Slovak Foreign minister and that the UK was proposing
Sir Emyr Jones Parry (UK Permanent Representative to the UN from
2003-7, and previously UK Permanent Representative to NATO and
FCO Political Director) as his replacement. The Minister noted
that the procedures were complex: once agreed by the EU, the successful
candidate would then need to be appointed, by consensus,
as HR by the Peace Implementation Council Steering Board.
The Minister expected the first step to be endorsement of Sir
Emyr at the 23 February GAERC, with a view to completing the selection
process by 1 March, "in order to ensure continuity at a crucial
time". The Minister hoped for the Committee's understanding
that if any new actions or documents were necessary to confirm
the candidate she might agree to them at the Council, and undertook
to "keep the Committee informed of developments", including
in the debate on 2 March.
11.8 The Committee saw no reason to take exception
to what the Minister proposed in these circumstances. But, rather
than allow this important issue to become embroiled in a larger
debate, the Committee asked the Minister, in the Explanatory Memorandum
she would have to provide on appointing Sir Emyr (or anyone else),
to set out the full background to the situation in BiH and her
expectations about developments during his twelve-month mandate.
The Joint Action
11.9 This Joint Action appointed Valentin Inzko as
the EUSR in Bosnia and Herzegovina for one year, from 1 March
2009 to 28 February 2010. His appointment was finalised by written
procedure on 11 March 2009. The Committee considered it at its
meeting on 18 March.
11.10 In her accompanying Explanatory Memorandum
of 12 March (which is set out in detail in our previous Report),
the Minister for Europe judged that one of the Conditions (signing
the SAA) and two of the Objectives had been met. However, the
second Condition a positive assessment of the situation
in BiH by the PIC steering board based on full compliance with
the Dayton Peace Agreement "remains relevant";
suggesting, presumably, that this could not be forthcoming at
least until the other three Objectives were met. From what the
Minister said, there seemed to be a basis for agreement on two
of them; but full implementation of the Transfer Agreement on
movable defence property, signed in March 2008, and finalising,
signing and implementing an appropriate Transfer Agreement on
immovable defence property seemed to be stalled.
11.11 With regard to the Government's expectations
on developments during the next 12 months, the Minister said:
if
Bosnian leaders worked together in a spirit of compromise and
flexibility, it was possible that the objectives and conditions
required for closure of the OHR would be met within 2009;
as and when the PIC made a decision on
OHR closure, and the EUSR became the primary representative of
the international community in BiH, a strengthening of the EUSR's
mandate might be required, so that it was adequate to deal with
ongoing challenges;
there was "an evolving debate at
the moment amongst EU member states on the strengthening of the
EUSR's mandate for any future reinforced EUSR, as and when the
Office of the High Representative closes."
11.12 But the Minister said nothing about the reasons
for Sir Emyr Jones Parry's withdrawal, nor of Mr Inzko's qualifications
to replace Mr Lajcak. Nor did she confirm whether or not he had
actually been appointed by the PIC. So we asked to hear more from
her about this and, in the meantime, cleared the document from
scrutiny.[48]
The Minister's letter of 2 April 2009
11.13 In her letter of 2 April 2009, the Minister
for Europe says that, although Sir Emyr Jones Parry "was
an excellent candidate, ultimately we were unable to reconcile Sir
Emyr's existing commitments with the short timescale foreseen
by High Representative Solana for taking up the post". She
continues as follows:
"Of the remaining candidates, Ambassador Valentin
Inzko was judged to be the strongest. As Austrian Ambassador to
Slovenia, a former Head of the Eastern and South-Eastern Department
at the Austrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ambassador to
BiH (1996 -1999) he impressed with his knowledge and experience
of the region. His fluency in the Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian
languages was also seen as a positive.
"The Peace Implementation Council (PIC) Steering
Board Ambassadors met in Sarajevo on 13 March and formally agreed
his appointment as the High Representative for BiH.
"Ambassador Inzko attended the recent PIC meeting
in Sarajevo on the 25-26 March. In his final act as High Representative,
Miroslav Lajcak (now Slovakian Foreign minister) formally handed
over responsibilities to Ambassador Inzko. Therefore as of 26
March Valentin Inzko is HR/EUSR in BiH.
"This Government welcomes the appointment of
Ambassador Inzko as HR/EUSR and will support him fully in his
efforts to drive forward progress in BiH.
We believe that he has the skills and experience to make a success
of the position. I spoke to Ambassador Inzko on 19 March and congratulated
him on his appointment. I also assured him of the UK's full support
for his role in BiH and discussed with him the challenges that
BiH will face over the forthcoming months."
Conclusion
11.14 This further information completes the picture
concerning Mr Lajcak's replacement, which we are reporting to
the House because of the widespread interest in developments in
the western Balkans generally, and in Bosnia and Herzegovina particularly.
44 See http://www.ohr.int/dpa/default.asp?content_id=380
for full information on the GFAP. Back
45
See http://www.ohr.int/ for full information about the OHR. Back
46
See (30351) -: HC 19-iv (2008-09), chapter 2 (21 January 2009). Back
47
See http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmgeneral/euro/090302/90302s01.htm
for the transcript of that debate. Back
48
See headnote: HC 19-xi (2008-09), chapter 16 (18 March 2009). Back
|