Memorandum 96
Memorandum from Professor Charles E Engel
related to the evidence session on Monday 9 March 2009
1. The emphasis appeared to relate to non-professional
higher education only.
2. No overriding criteria seemed to be offered
in relation to the general and specific aims of higher education
which could act as "touch stones" for the acceptability,
effectiveness and efficiency of the components and outcomes of
a degree curriculum.
3. The evidence did not appear to attempt
to explore the relationship of performance prior to, and subsequent
to graduation (how does a superb degree relate to the recipient's
subsequent contribution to society?). What independent, long term
evaluation has or is being undertaken?
4. Where selection of students is concerned,
research over some ten years at a medical school demonstrated
that students with lower school leaving attainment from less privileged
schools succeeded equally well during and by the conclusion of
a demanding five year curriculum. One contributing factor was
thought to be the affect of an integrated, cumulative curriculum.
In the absence of modules all disciplines contributed throughout
the curriculum (in a problem-based learning setting).
5. The educational disadvantages of the
modular design of many academic curricula would suggest that the
design of courses might benefit from revision with the needs of
the 21st Century in mind.
6. One major impediment may be the persistent
autonomy of separate disciplines which make an integrated development
and application of knowledge and understanding quite difficult
for students. There is now some experience with the application
of matrix management for the design, implementation, monitoring
and evaluation of cumulative, integrated curricula, where academics
from the participating disciplines can collaboratenot as
guardians of their respective discipline.
7. Perhaps more attention might be paid
to the nature and application of assessment and the consequent
affect on students' learning.
7.1 Active, self directed and reflective
learning (leading to lifelong learning) would call for frequent
formative, informal assessment for rapid guidance of the individual
student's learning..
7.2 Less frequent summative assessment would
also contribute to the student's educational development in a
maturation process designed to foster progressive maturation from
late adolescence to adult membership of society.
7.3 Where collaboration, rather than inhibiting
competition, is the educational aim, emphasis on grading ought
to be avoided.
8. Teaching would preferably be regarded
as a range of different activities and responsibilities, including
not only face to face interaction with students but also mentoring,
acting as a consultant to help students to arrive at their own
insights, designing assessments, assessing students' performance,
designing curriculum constructs, selecting students, supervising
research.
8.1 Development in educational expertise
might be seen as a gradual maturation process. Post doctoral academics
may feel more secure in their current detailed knowledge and thus
wish to emphasise this in their teaching. More senior academics,
with their deep scholarship and appreciation of fundamental principles
may be quite outstanding teachers. Thus teaching might be recognised
as a privilege of more senior colleagues, while junior colleagues
are still earning their academic spurs through their research.
8.3 Where higher education is seen as preparation
for productive adult citizenship, academic teachers ought to have
experience of the outside world, rather than only the relative
security of progression from school to undergraduate and postgraduate
study and research, and thus on to academic posts. Successful
teachers in professional subjects tend to remain active in professional
practice. They are familiar with the need for continuing their
further education.
9. One of the issues raised by the Committee
was whether the standard of university education in this country
was satisfactory. Both within the UK and elsewhere, eg North America,
questions are being asked whether their respective higher education
is adequate to prepare students for world wide competition in
the 21st Century.
9.1 This issue relates to the Recommendation
in my Submission with Bland Tomkinson.
March 2009
|