|
Memorandum submitted by
1. This summary document accompanies written
submissions from the Network of Sector 2. The Sector 3. The SSCs understand that education and skills
are devolved functions and recognise the need to work on a four nation basis.
In fact, SSCs are the 4. Recognising its responsibilities in 5. The 6. In this inquiry, we have submitted evidence from 15 SSCs and the Chief Executive of Skills for Justice, Alan Woods along with 3 National and Specialist representatives will be meeting with the Committee, who will be able to answer questions on their specific sector submissions. Themes 7. The essential characteristic of Sectors is that have a distinct mix of employment and skills needs and this is reflected in the detailed work of each SSC to identify the specific relationship that their employers need with the education system and its cross border applicability. However, we believe there are common themes which run through the submissions which may serve as a basis for further discussion. Understanding
the Role of Sector 8. Sector 9. The role of a Sector 10. These standards provide a common currency
across the 11. Major research into employer needs has been
carried out by each Sector Skills Council which has been pulled together in
Sector Skills Agreements signed by SSCs and key stakeholders in each of the
four nations. These are crucial documents that should drive the relationship
between education providers and employers across the 12. Sector Qualifications Strategies are being developed as a clear statement from a sector about the type of qualifications that are valued by employers. They are based around the national standards. Additionally, SSCs have responsibility for developing Apprenticeship frameworks which are based on these standards and qualifications.
Student recruitment and retention 13. Individuals need to be able to make informed choices about their education. A key issue is to understand their career prospects and vocational relevance of programmes. Traditionally supply has been led by student demand but this is now being tempered by the demands of employers and the job prospects of graduates. SSCs are the route for this employer influence on supply. 14. A key measure of the economic value of Higher and Further Education is the extent to which it provides a route to employment. The level of graduate recruitment varies by sector and needs to be understood. A key criticism is of oversupply and the non-employment relevance of programmes. 15. The key partnership between SSCs and HEIs is to ensure a smooth transition between education and employment. A consistent concern from employers is the vocational relevance of degrees. It is recognised that not all degree programmes are designed to be specifically vocational - however individuals need to be able to make an informed choice. We need to be able to answer the question "if I want to be a.... then do I need a degree....and if so, which one?" In turn employers need to understand what skills are acquired by those with a particular degree. 16. Mapping degree programmes against the skills and knowledge articulated in the National Occupational Standards, produced by SSCs, can help this. 17. Many sectors welcome the inclusion of work
experience in a vocational degree programme, again this is something to explore
with individual SSCs. Flexible delivery such as Foundation Degrees are proving
a popular way in many sectors to link a university education with work. In
these sectors, SSCs welcome the opportunity to work with HEIs to shape the
programme and content. Indeed, in the 18. Employers welcome bite-sized learning and flexible delivery that can support the development of their current employees in their career development. Up-skilling the current workforce is a key target for all sectors. To be able to step back into Higher Education to develop new skills as your career develops is important for individuals and their employers. Many sectors see this as the best investment for increasing HE numbers and raising skills levels. However, flexible delivery and the integration of distance learning and work-based project work are key components in these programmes. 19. Employers understand that graduates are often not the finished article. A few sectors have explored the concept of "graduate apprenticeships" to help employers to provide a structured development pathway for graduates that can help embed themselves in the organisation and enable the employer to make the best use of graduate skills. 20. There is a need to ensure lecturers and college
staff are up to date in their understanding of industry. SSCs can assist with
this. For example, a successful exchange programme operates in 21. Traditionally, further education offers more
vocational relevance and flexibility of delivery, supporting work based
training and apprenticeships. SSC influence over national qualification
frameworks in each of the four countries and in the introduction of credits is
a way of ensuring the vocational relevance of FE provision. SSC support the
rationalisation of vocational qualifications in line with employer needs and
would welcome equal influence on the content of qualification frameworks in 22. SSCs understand the desire to expand numbers in both higher and further education. However, they would like to see this in the context of Life Long Learning and continuing professional development. They would encourage flexible delivery and support for access in later life, with the use of distance learning and innovative modes of learning and assessment. 23. There is some concern about completion rates. It is felt that the flexibility indicated in the previous paragraph would help to address the issue. 24. The SSC Management and Leadership forum would like to see the principles of management introduced at an early stage throughout the education system, encouraging self management and team working, therefore growing and understanding the role of management both in the role of work and in personal life. 25. The submissions from individual SSCs highlight
the importance of specialist provision and the need to ensure that this is
accessible equally to students across the
Student finance 26. Differences in funding and priorities between
nations, and in FE, between regions and sectors, impacts adversely on student
choice and access. It can also disadvantage employers making certain sectors
less attractive to students. For example; lower resourcing of FE in 27. Funding needs to be more flexible and support
available to lifelong learning and existing up-skilling of existing workforce
through access to HE and FE throughout peoples working life is seen as crucial
to addressing the training culture that is necessary for the The way in which further and higher education institutions engage with employers on both sides of the border. 28. Sector Skills Councils are the key to this
relationship across the · A
coherent and researched evidence base on the future skill needs of each sector
of the economy in · A link to the co-ordinated and official voice of employers in a Sector and help to shape a programme so that it meets the needs of employment. · A clear route back to employers to explain and promote an understanding of their programmes · An
opportunity for · Informed advice on career routes and prospects to support informed choice by individual learners. 29. Further and higher education institutions engage with employers for four key purposes 1. To supply learning programmes to employers and their workforces 2. To ensure that the curricula offered remains relevant to employment 3. To recruit vocationally skilled professionals who are able to/desire to teach and pass on their skills. 4. To enable FE/HEI providers to access vocationally based CPD opportunities for their staff.
30. It is fair to say that relationships between
SSCs and the supply-side are improving on both sides of the border. As a result
of the scale of provision in
Conclusion 31. In principle, employers see no reason why
higher education provision in 32. The Sector Skills Agreements have opened the way for new relationships with individual institutions and educational stakeholders. In the submission there are many examples of good practice. 33. Employers work in a 34. Further education provision has the capacity to
serve a more local focus and working within the National Credit and
Qualification frameworks of 35. Ultimately, employers need to understand qualifications and would welcome consistency, transferability and simplicity in the system. Equality of access and funding support should be the aim.
19 June 2008 Please note the following appendices: 1. Appendix 001 - LifeLong Learning 2. Appendix 002 - IMI 3. Appendix 003 - GoSkills 4. Appendix 004 - FSSC 5. Appendix 005 - Creative & Cultural 6. Appendix 006 - SummitSkills 7. Appendix 007 - Skillset 8. Appendix 008 - Skills for Justice 9. Appendix 009 - Semta 10. Appendix 010 - Asset Skills 11. Appendix 011 - Lantra 12. Appendix 012 - Cogent 13. Appendix 013 - EU Skills 14. Appendix 014 - Government Skills 15. Appendix 015 - SkillsActive |
