United Kingdom Parliament
Publications & records
Advanced search
 HansardArchivesResearchHOC PublicationsHOL PublicationsCommittees
Select Committee on Welsh Affairs Fifth Report


1  The proposed Order relating to vulnerable children

Purpose

12.  The Explanatory Memorandum to the proposed Order notes that it would confer enhanced legislative competence on the Assembly to reform the law in relation to vulnerable children and child poverty to:

(i)  rationalise and consolidate existing provisions for vulnerable children;

(ii)  reform the law to provide the legal framework for the implementation of key components of the Welsh Assembly Government's policies for vulnerable children in Wales;

(iii)  take action to place duties on public bodies to demonstrate their contribution to ending child poverty; and

(iv)  create a statutory right for free child care for two year olds in greatest need. [15]

The scope of the proposed Order

13.  The Welsh Assembly Government's Explanatory Memorandum notes:

… the principal enhancement is in the field of social welfare, although there are related matters in the fields of education and training, and sport and recreation … . Cross border duties in relation to England and Wales are preserved.[16]

14.  Reporting on the proposed Order as revised, the Deputy Minister wrote in a letter to the Chair of the Assembly Committee:

… I can assure you that … the scope of the LCO remains broad and will allow [the Welsh Assembly Government] to deliver on [its] policy in One Wales and more widely.[17]

And, in evidence to us:

The scope is wide. It will cover children and young people from birth up to the age of 25. The scope of the LCO, I believe, is wide enough to allow measures of a wide range to be introduced.[18]

Use of the Legislative Competence Order in Council procedure

15.  We asked the Deputy Minister in evidence whether the Legislative Competence Order in Council procedure was the most appropriate way for the Welsh Assembly Government to pursue its policy objectives in this area rather than the use of framework powers in a Westminster Bill, for example the Children and Young Person's Bill. Mr Mike Lubienski, a lawyer for the Welsh Assembly Government who accompanied the Deputy Minister, explained:

There is a Children and Young Person's Bill going through [Parliament] at present, but that has a much narrower focus and would not really have accommodated the type of Legislative Competence Order that is sought here.[19]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State supported this view:

If there has been an entirely appropriate Bill that would have given us that ability to really work at the Welsh aspects of this then we would have considered that, but I do not think it quite fitted with the legislative programme from last year.[20]

16.  A number of children's organisations questioned whether new laws were what was required, rather than more resources and better implementation of the Assembly Government's existing powers; for example, Gofal Cymru:

We are obviously keen to see improvements to mental health services for children and young people, but feel that more resources, rather than more legislation, is the key to achieving this. Whilst we would therefore welcome any future legislation that would improve mental health and well-being, we would urge the Welsh Assembly Government to prioritise putting adequate funding in place to implement existing strategies …[21]

To which the Deputy Minister responded:

… it is not always a question of resources, but it is being able to introduce legislation that makes sense to the situation we are dealing with in Wales.[22]

17.  Given that there was no appropriate Westminster Bill which would have provided an opportunity for the Welsh Assembly Government to pursue its objectives in this policy area, we agree that the Legislative Competence Order in Council procedure is the appropriate route for the Welsh Assembly Government to pursue in this case.

The proposed Order and existing Welsh Assembly Government policy

18.  The Welsh Assembly Government's Explanatory Memorandum cites four key publications which underpin its policy for children and young people: its overarching policy document, Rights to action; the ten-year strategy for social services in Wales, Fulfilled lives, supportive communities; Towards a stable life and a brighter future; and the Child poverty implementation plan.[23] The Memorandum lists the Assembly Government's core aims in respect of vulnerable children and child poverty, and states that the proposed Order is "a necessary vehicle to deliver these commitments".[24]

19.  The Welsh Assembly Government noted in its Explanatory Memorandum its "commitment to developing Wales-specific solutions to child poverty"[25] and "the need for Wales to acquire the powers to tackle Welsh priorities and issues".[26] The Deputy Children's Commissioner agreed noting that, "It is a principle of good governance that we have local solutions for local problems".[27] This view was supported by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, who said in evidence:

… in immediate terms the issue of Child Trust Fund accounts is a very intelligent way forward to deliver additionality that does not rely on the Treasury to do it but relies on the Welsh Assembly Government working with local authorities to actually put subscriptions into the Child Trust Fund … Free childcare places for two year-olds in the greatest need is an immediately identified issue that comes out of this LCO. Requiring local authorities to provide services to support parents as well in terms of the wellbeing of children is immediate. In the longer term, what comes out of this LCO is ensuring the welfare of children and young people in Wales right up to 25 years-old with Wales-manufactured solutions to recognise that there are differences in policy and strategy …[28]

20.  We agree that the proposed Order is consistent with established Welsh Assembly Government policy and existing commitments.

The "identifiable need" for the proposed Order

THE RATIONALISATION OF EXISTING LEGISLATION

21.  One justification given in evidence to us of the need for this Order was the rationalisation of existing legislation. The Welsh Assembly Government's Explanatory Memorandum notes that the proposed Order is drawn so as "… to enable the Assembly to reform and consolidate existing legislation for children in need …".[29] The Memorandum states:

There now exists a large volume of legislation relating to the welfare of children and young people that is fragmented and has been amended by many Acts of Parliament and various Orders and Regulations … There are also inconsistencies between areas of legislation … The Order will allow the reform and consolidation of existing legislation in relation to vulnerable children, bringing together and rationalising provisions made over the years.[30]

22.  The Deputy Minister assured us that those parts of existing legislation which contain powers and defined terms which overlap with those contained in the proposed Order would be disapplied in relation to Wales:

When the Assembly Measures are made under the scope provided by this Order, then the sections of the England and Wales Acts which they replace will be amended to disapply them in relation to Wales. They will of course remain in force in relation to England.[31]

23.  The Deputy Minister explained in evidence to us that it was the responsibility of the Children's Minister to ensure that the Assembly Government's own policy and legislation in respect of vulnerable children was consistent and coherent,[32] and that complex legislation relating to children was "joined up" into a single framework which rationalised all the different aspects of the law.[33] Donna Davies, Head of Vulnerable Children Policy, Welsh Assembly Government, told us:

… bringing together and consolidating and rationalising the law, in particular for practitioners on the ground, would be very, very helpful because it is very convoluted and can lead to children not always having the services they are entitled to because of misunderstanding. More importantly, within Wales it is to allow us to take forward the partnership agenda so that we would be able to get better co-operation against the partnerships about functions that we would place on them in respect of children.[34]

24.  This was supported by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, who told us that:

… sometimes actually streamlining and clarifying exactly the way the legislation works can be of immense advantage to agents out in the field delivering these services.[35]

25.  We agree that the consolidation and rationalisation of existing legislation in relation to vulnerable children in Wales is a laudable aim of the proposed Order which would do much to advance clarity and understanding of the current situation, as well as to help reduce gaps in service provision.

TACKLING CHILD POVERTY

26.  The Welsh Assembly Government's Explanatory Memorandum also cites tackling child poverty as a reason for bringing forward the proposed Order:

The Order will also provide a legal framework for the Welsh Assembly Government to take forward its proposals to tackle child poverty, in particular to underpin arrangements to provide a top-up payment to the Child Trust Fund accounts for certain categories of children and specific arrangements for Welsh local authorities to boost the savings of children in Wales.[36]

27.  However, no specific reference is made to "child poverty" on the face of the proposed Order, although Matter 15.1 refers to "reducing inequalities in well-being between children and young persons". The Assembly Committee's Report concluded:

… we feel that the concept of 'child poverty' is so central a theme of the proposed Order that it should be recognised by the inclusion of the term on the face of the legislation, especially in light of the Assembly Government's target to eradicate child poverty in Wales by 2020. We therefore recommend that provision be made within the body of proposed Order for "child poverty", for example, by the addition of a further Matter relating expressly to this … We further recommend that corresponding provision be made in the Interpretation section of the proposed Order for "child poverty" …[37]

28.  However, Mr Mike Lubienski, a lawyer for the Welsh Assembly Government, explained in evidence to us the reasons why the Welsh Assembly Government had not included the term "child poverty" in the face of the proposed Order:

"Child poverty" is a term which is used in different contexts but very commonly to do with relative poverty, so there was a danger of giving it a connotation which was limited and not broad enough. In many regards, given the fact that the word itself might have a connotation of being only about material poverty, and again that might not suit the breadth of the Assembly's agenda, it was better to have a phrase, such as "reducing inequalities" which, again, chimes with UK law as well and covers the full scope of any agenda on poverty that the Assembly will develop.[38]

29.  While we agree with the Assembly Committee that child poverty is a central theme of the proposed Order, we do not concur with that Committee's recommendation that the term "child poverty" be included on the face of the Order, for example by the introduction of an additional Matter. Although we agree that child poverty is a central theme, we agree with the Welsh Assembly Government that the inclusion of terms such as "reducing inequalities" clearer and more appropriate, and, being consistent with other UK statutory provisions, better suited for purpose.

CURRENT LEGISLATIVE CONSTRAINTS

30.  In its Memorandum, the Welsh Assembly Government refers to "current legislative restrictions" and constraints which prevent it from using its existing powers to achieve the desired policy outcomes contained in the proposed Order.[39] The Memorandum continues:

Limitations on the current settlement restrict our ability to bring forward the range of coherent provisions that we would like to see and that would make a difference for vulnerable children in Wales, based on a stronger focus on preventative action and on support for parents as well as children.[40]

31.  When asked to provide specific examples of such legislative constraints, the Deputy Minister said:

The current settlement may not always concur or provide for a Wales approach. For example, we do not have children's trusts in Wales; we work on a partnership basis instead. The LCO therefore would allow us to place greater responsibility on the partners - public bodies that are devolved, of course - in discharging their functions to support children and their families.[41]

32.  Donna Davies, Head of Vulnerable Children Policy for the Welsh Assembly Government, identified the following examples:

We want to be able to extend some of our support; in particular, in the area of children with disabilities, up to 25 years of age and, more generally, to extend our children and young people policies to children up to 25 years of age, which does not exist in current legislation.[42]

33.  We thank the Deputy Minister and Welsh Assembly Government Officials for setting out in evidence to us what they identify as the main legislative constraints operating upon the Welsh Assembly Government's ability to legislate in this area.[43] We believe that in future it would be helpful, where existing legislative constraint is cited as a reason for introducing a proposed Order, for a comprehensive explanation of the legislative constraints to be included in the Explanatory Memorandum.

EXCEPTIONS TO MATTERS

34.  The proposed Order, as revised, changes the list of excepted Matters that fall outside the Welsh Assembly's legislative competence as currently set out in Schedule 5 of the Government of Wales Act 2006. In particular, articles 1(3) and 6 make changes to the list of excepted Matters relating to highways and transport under field 10. While these changes are merely technical in their effect, they are entirely unrelated to the subject of vulnerable children and there is little explanation of why these changes need to be made.

35.  We discourage proposed Orders that address a specific subject, such as vulnerable children, from being used as an opportunity to make changes to entirely unrelated fields. Where this practice can not be avoided, we emphasise the importance of including an adequate explanation of those changes in the Explanatory Memorandum.

CROSS-BORDER ISSUES

36.  A recent study commissioned by the Welsh Assembly Government found considerable use of English services for those vulnerable children ordinarily resident in Wales, and vice-versa.[44] At the time of the study, of the 317 Welsh-resident children placed in specialist residential units, one third were placed in Wales and two thirds in England. Both the Welsh Assembly Government and the Deputy Children's Commissioner referred in evidence to the diversification of policy in the delivery of services for children and young people in England and Wales,[45] indicating that the proposed Order does raise cross-border issues. However, the Deputy Children's Commissioner went on to say:

I think the cross-border issues, as important as they are, when we look at the numbers, are very, very few, compared to the 700,000 children in Wales and the 4,000 children in Wales in care.[46]

37.  This view was supported by the Deputy Minister, who told us that the extent of cross-border issues in this area would not be affected by the introduction of the proposed Order.[47]

38.   However, the Deputy Commissioner cautioned that under the terms of the proposed Order there was a potential for cross-border issues to increase,[48] and that:

… both countries need to liaise very closely … and come up with some form of agreement about who is going to be funding, who is going to be giving a service to the child, and what service they are going to get.[49]

DEVOLVED AND NON-DEVOLVED RESPONSIBILITIES

39.  Some areas of responsibility, although non-devolved, nevertheless impinge upon the care of children and young people - for example the police and probation services, youth justice and the prison estate. There is already close co-operation with the Children's Commissioner for Wales in those areas for which responsibility is retained at Westminster. The Deputy Children's Commissioner told us in evidence that while the proposed Order had the potential to improve the current situation and could raise the standard of services provided,[50] at present this relied on very close cross-border liaison based on protocol, policy frameworks and guidance:

… if we go to our powers, we cannot use some of our functions within those areas. We can liaise, we can negotiate, we can mediate, we can have access where we are allowed access, but we cannot use some of our other powers.[51]

40.  The Deputy Children's Commissioner continued:

… over the last six or seven years we have come across the most appalling treatment of children in those areas where we have not been able to use our full functions to assist them, and neither has the English Commissioner been able to assist them because he is precluded from assisting individual children. There is that gap there that children are falling down.[52]

…we know where it is not working and we know which children are falling through the gap. To sit here and say it objectively is one thing, but when you are meeting these children and seeing the impact on them, you would not believe that these things are happening in the UK and there is not an organisation which is able or empowered to properly champion their rights.[53]

41.  The Deputy Commissioner believed that the most effective way of addressing this would be by way of an over-arching legal framework, rather than the current reliance on liaison, protocols, agreements and policy frameworks.[54] However regarding the proposed Order, the Deputy Commissioner said that she would welcome the inclusion of reference to other bodies concerned with the well-being of children into Matter 15.5 such as the UK Border Agency and the Fire and Rescue Services.

42.  We note with concern the Deputy Children's Commissioner's evidence that the split in responsibilities between England and Wales for safeguarding and promoting the well-being of children and young people has resulted in vulnerable children not receiving the services they need. We recognise that this proposed Order would not address the gaps in provision, and note the view of the Deputy Children's Commissioner that one way of addressing this issue would be by way of an over-arching legal framework for England and Wales. However, in the absence of such a framework, we recommend that Matter 15.5 of the proposed Order be expanded to include reference to other bodies which work with vulnerable children such as the UK Border Agency and the Fire and Rescue Services.


15   Ev 30 (para 15) Back

16   ibid (para 19) Back

17   Letter of 18 March 2008 from the Deputy Minister to the Chair of the Assembly Committee (not printed here) Back

18   Q 57 Back

19   Q 67 Back

20   Q 104 Back

21   Evidence to the Assembly Committee (not printed here) Back

22   Q 62 Back

23   Rights to action, Welsh Assembly Government 2005; Fulfilled lives, supportive communities - a strategy for social services in Wales over the next decade, Welsh Assembly Government 2007; Towards a stable life and a brighter future, Welsh Assembly Government 2007; Child poverty implementation plan, Welsh Assembly Government Back

24   Ev 28 (para 6) Back

25   ibid Back

26   Ev 29 (para 11) Back

27   Q 3 Back

28   Q 103 Back

29   Ev 30 (para 17); Q 58 Back

30   Ev 29 (para 13) Back

31   Ev 33 Back

32   Q 68 Back

33   ibid Back

34   Q 72 Back

35   Q 103 Back

36   Ev 30 (para 16) Back

37   Assembly Committee Report, para 88, pp 24-25 Back

38   Q 81 Back

39   Ev 30 (para 15) Back

40   ibid (para 11) Back

41   Q 60 Back

42   Q 63 Back

43   Qs 60-64 Back

44   Children in specialist placements - an all-Wales study, Dr Heather Payne, Ian Butler, Pat Smail, Anne Crowley, Dr Eddy Street, Dr Hilary Barton, December 2003, based on research commissioned by the Welsh Assembly Government  Back

45   Ev 29 (para 10); Q 3 Back

46   Q 48 Back

47   Q 86 Back

48   Qs 15-16 Back

49   Q 16 Back

50   Q 18 Back

51   Q 43 Back

52   Q 44 Back

53   Q 49 Back

54   Qs 19-26 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 26 June 2008