Further supplementary memorandum submitted
by the HM Revenue & Customs
This Memorandum responds to the Sub-Committee's
requests at the hearing on 5 December.
The Committee asked if we have a figure for what
the cost of calls to the Child Benefit helpline would have been
to users [Q 367]
We have looked into the cost in more depth and
find that we still can not provide the Committee with a figure.
The cost of calls to "non geographic"
numbers such as 0845, 0870 and 0800 is dependent on several factors.
Calls are charged to the customer based on the tariff arrangements
they themselves have with their own telephone service provider,
the device they use for the call and the location from which they
call. This is customer information which HMRC does not hold and
it is therefore not possible for us to estimate the cost of calls.
Our current policy is to operate customer facing
helplines using 0845 prefix as the department believes this strikes
the right cost balance between the customer and the public purse.
HMRC does not make any money from using 0845 numbers. Using a
non geographic prefixsuch as 0845allows us to:
exploit, cost effectively, modern
contact centre technology to best advantage;
direct calls to the next available
adviser anywhere in the country; and
have shorter queues, shorter waiting
times and fewer customers get engaged tones and busy messages.
The Committee asked which version of WinZip was
used for compression and what was the form of the password [Q
391]
As Mr Hartnett explained in his evidence to
the Committee, the data was password protected using WinZip version
8. The level of encryption is not considered sufficient to protect
the data. We have now upgraded to 256 bit encryption with at least
a 20 character password. Publication of any further detail about
the specific password used will be considered as part of the Poynter
Review, taking into account the need to prevent any further risk
that data might be misused.
The Committee asked when the police were advised
of the data loss [Q 394]
As the Chancellor of the Exchequer explained
in his statement to the House on 20 November 2007 (Official
Report, Column 1101), on Wednesday 14 November he instructed
the then Chairman of HMRC to call in the Metropolitan Police to
conduct a full investigation. The Chairman formally notified the
Police on Thursday 15 November.
The Committee asked for details of staff bonus
payments for 2005-06 and 2006-07 [Qq 401-11]
END OF YEAR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT BONUSES
PAID (FINANCIAL YEAR)
| 2006-07 | 2005-06
|
| £m | |
|
| SCS | 1.7 | 1.5
|
| Others | 17.2 | 9.7
|
| Total | 18.9 | 11.0
|
Number of bonuses |
| |
| SCS | 220 | 311
|
| Others | 37,959 | 35,605
|
2006-07 was the first year that bonus payments were made
under the new integrated HMRC performance pay arrangements. These
arrangements are aimed at rewarding individual performance, through
bonus payments, thereby driving up performance within the department.
HMRC's bonus pot for staff below SCS is currently 0.8%.
The Committee asked whether any guidance has been given to
the intelligence teams to concentrate on the Channel ports [Q
422-3]
Our intelligence officers have not been given guidance to
concentrate only on ports and airports approved for international
arrivals and departures. We have officers who specialise in securing
intelligence in respect of unapproved ports and airports. The
intelligence is used for law enforcement activities within HMRC
and by the police.
The Committee asked for details of employment, including part-time
and casual employment, for security at buildings [Q 426]
Of the 227 security guards employed by HMRC, including day
security, we have only 9 fixed term appointment (FTA)/agency staff
(just under 4%) engaged in security activities. Additionally FTA
staff are not allowed to take up guarding activities until they
have been cleared by the Counter Terrorist Check vetting procedure.
There are no part-time security staff.
The Committee asked whether the contract given to Mapeley for
security staff was subject to competitive tender [Q 489]
The Estates PFI contract, which includes the provision of
security guarding services, was subject to full competitive tender.
At the time that this contract was let, the former Departments
took the decision to retain any existing in-house security guarding.
The buildings covered by in-house arrangements are relatively
few in number because the majority of the Department's buildings
are secured by external security providers. There are a total
of 120 buildings on the estate which have guards providing security
and of these, 22 sites have in-house security guards.
The Committee asked for statistics on VAT registration targets,
performance and complaints [Q 493]
| 2007 | August |
September | October
| November |
| Applications received | 21,891
| 19,947 | 21,219 | 23,181
|
| % processed in 14 days[9]
| 14.4% | 19.75% | 45.45%
| 57.57% |
| Average time to process (days) [10]
| 42 | 39 | 28 |
18 |
| Number of cases unstarted | 30,905
| 25,619 | 5,862 | 1,756
|
| Number of complaints received | 155
| 115 | 100 | 71
|
January 2008
9
Percentage of cases processed in the month that were processed
in 14 days. Back
10
Average time to process a case processed this month. Back
|