Memorandum from HM Treasury
WINTER SUPPLEMENTARY
ESTIMATES 2007-08
This memorandum provides details of changes
sought in the Treasury's Winter Supplementary Estimate for 2007-08
published in "Central Government Supply Estimates 2007-08:
Winter Supplementary Estimates" HCxxx. Further details
of the work of the Treasury and its finances can be found in the
"HM Treasury Annual Report and Accounts 2006-07" HC
518. Supply Estimates and the Treasury's Departmental Report
are available from http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide
the select committee with an explanation of how the resources
and cash sought in the Winter Supplementary Estimate will be applied
to achieve departmental objectives and Public Service Agreement
(PSA) targets. This includes information on comparisons with the
resources provided in earlier years in Estimates and departmental
budgets.
SUMMARY OF
THE CHANGES
SOUGHT IN
THE ESTIMATE
1. The Estimate seeks a net increase of
£14,519,000 in resources and £17,568,000 in the net
cash requirement. The changes for which approval is sought are:
A Machinery of Government transfer
of £4,028,000 from Cabinet Office following the transfer
of the Prime Ministers Delivery Unit. (RfR 1);
An increase in near cash resources
of £2,000,000 to finance the Thoresen Review. (RFR 1);
An increase of £8,491,000 for
OGC to fund their voluntary early retirement and severance scheme;
An increase in the net cash requirement
of £5,000,000 for finished coinage stocks. (RfR 2).
2. The headline changes in voted totals,
compared to the provision in the Main Estimate, are:
| | Net Resources within RfR 1
| increase of £6,028,000 |
| | Net Resources within RfR 2
| Nil |
| | Net Resources within RfR 3
| increase of £8,491,000 |
| | Net total resources
| increase of £14,519,000 |
| | Net Capital expenditure
| Nil |
| | Net Cash Requirement
| increase of £17,568,000 |
| |
|
DETAILED EXPLANATION
OF THE
CHANGES BEING
SOUGHT
Request for Resources 1: Raising the rate of sustainable growth
and achieving rising prosperity and a better quality of life,
with economic and employment opportunities for all
Section ACore Treasury
3. A Machinery of Government transfer was announced on
28 June transferring the Prime Ministers Delivery Unit from the
Cabinet Office to HM Treasury. It was agreed that £4,028,000
in near cash DEL provision would be transferred from the Cabinet
Office in the Winter Supplementary to cover the full year costs
of the Unit.
4. The Estimate also seeks an increase in near cash resources
of £2,000,000 to finance the Thoresen Review. The Review,
led by Otto Thoresen, Chief Executive of AEGON UK, has a remit
to develop a model that can meet the demands of those consumers
most vulnerable to the consequences of poor financial decision-making.
The provision will be funded from the Financial Inclusion Fund.
Request for Resources 3: Obtaining the best value for money
from Government's commercial relationships on a sustainable basis
Section AOffice of Government Commerce
5. There is an increase in resources of £8,491,000
(£6,540,000 near cash and £1,951,000 non cash). This
is to fund the OGC's voluntary early retirement and severance
scheme costs arising from the Transforming Government Procurement
review. The review launched a new strategy and part of the redefined
remit resulted in OGC becoming a smaller, higher calibre organisation.
To achieve the reduction in numbers, a programme of structural
exits was instigated. The provision will be funded from the programme
Departmental Unallocated Provision (DUP).
6. As explained in paragraph 14 below, these costs are
exceptionally being classified as programme rather than administration
costs. The programme DUP of £8,491,000 is therefore being
utilised in full to finance the increase in RfR 3. The DUP provision
will be split between near cash of £6,540,000 and non cash
of £1,951,000.
NET CASH
REQUIREMENT
7. In addition to the changes described above, the net
cash requirement is being increased by a further £5,000,000
to provide funding to buy the stock of finished UK circulating
coinage from the Royal Mint. In order to encourage more efficient
scheduling of production, the new service level agreement between
the Treasury and the Mint changes the basis on which HM Treasury
pays for coinage from when coins are issued to banks to when they
are produced.
IMPACT ON
THE DEPARTMENT'S
PUBLIC SERVICE
AGREEMENT
8. The increase in RfR 1 of £2,000,000 for the Thoresen
review has no impact on any of the Treasury's PSA targets. Spending
on the review falls under the Treasury's Objective III: Promote
efficient, stable and fair financial markets, for their users
and the economy.
9. The cash increase related to RfR 2 (coinage) has no
impact on the Treasury's PSA targets. Spending on coinage falls
under the Treasury's Objective 1: Maintain a stable macroeconomic
environment with low inflation and sound public finances in accordance
with the code for fiscal stability.
10. The increase in RfR 3 will contribute to the achievement
of PSA target 10: Deliver a further £3 billion saving by
2007-08 in central Government civil procurement (building on the
savings achieved since 2000) through improvements in the success
rate of programmes and projects and through other commercial initiatives.
DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE
LIMIT
11. The Supplementary Estimate increases the Resource
DEL by £6,028,000 comprising £4,028,000 for the MoG
transfer and £2,000,000 for the Thoresen review. The near
cash total within voted resource DEL increases by £12,568,000
and the non voted element is reduced by £8,491,000. The following
table shows a comparison between DEL plans between 2003-04 and
2006-07 (after changes made via Supplementary Estimates) and the
outturns for those years, and the DEL for 2007-08, including the
Winter Supplementary increases.
COMPARISON OF EXPENDITURE AGAINST DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE
LIMITS
| £m | |
| | | |
| Year | Voted | Non-voted
| Total DEL | Outturn | Variance
|
| Resource | |
| | |
|
| 2003-04 | 192 | 24
| 216 | 209 | 7
|
| 2004-05 | 217 | 31
| 247 | 184 | 63
|
| 2005-06 | 227 | 29
| 256 | 230 | 26
|
| 2006-07 | 225 | 21
| 246 | 209 | 36
|
| 2007-08 | 204 | 28
| 232 | | |
| Of which near cash | 192
| 39 | 231 |
| |
| | |
| | |
| Capital | |
| | |
|
| 2003-04 | 8 |
| 8 | 4 | 4 |
| 2004-05 | 8 |
| 8 | -20 | 28 |
| 2005-06 | 5 |
| 5 | -9 | 14 |
| 2006-07 | 7 |
| 7 | -1 | 8 |
| 2007-08 | 7 |
| 7 | | |
The underspend against resource DEL in 2004-05 includes an exceptional
gain of £8 million on the disposal of 100 Parliament Street
Further analysis of Treasury group spending trends can be found
in Chapter 7 of "HM Treasury Annual Report and Accounts 2006-07"
HC 518.
Figures in the table have been adjusted to include the budget
and outturn for the Prime Minister's Delivery Unit, following
the transfer of that budget from the Cabinet Office, and will
differ from the figures in the 2007 Departmental Report accordingly.
DEPARTMENTAL UNALLOCATED
PROVISION (DUP)
12. The Winter Supplementary Estimate includes draw down
of the full amount of the programme DUP of £8,491,000. This
is to finance the spending explained at paragraph 5 above. The
administration DUP of £7,422,000 is not being drawn down
at this time as it is being held in reserve to help fund this
year's Group Shared Services restructuring costs.
END YEAR
FLEXIBILITY
13. At present there are no plans to draw down any EYF
in 2007-08. On that basis, our current EYF entitlement will be
rolled forward into 2008-09 as follows.
| £m | |
| | | |
| Administration | Other resources
| Total
resource
EYF
| Of which
near cash |
Capital | Total EYF
|
| 59 | 115 | 174
| 181 | 65 | 239
|
14. The need for use of any of the EYF entitlement will
be kept under review in the context of the financial risks carried
by the group (such as demand for coinage).
ADMINISTRATION BUDGET
15. The Administration Budget will increase by £6,028,000
to reflect the MoG transfer and the increase in respect of the
Thoresen Review. The increase of £8,491,000 in RfR 3 for
OGC structural exits would normally be classified as administration
costs. However, as part of the SR04 settlement it was agreed that
one-off exit costs incurred by the HM Treasury group in achieving
managed staff reductions could be excluded from the department's
administration budget.
COMPARISON OF ADMINISTRATION COSTS AGAINST LIMIT
| £m | |
| | | |
| Year | Voted | Non-voted
| Total | Outturn | Variance
|
| 2003-04 | 150 | 0
| 150 | 144 | 6
|
| 2004-05 | 164 | 0
| 164 | 135 | 29
|
| 2005-06 | 167 | 0
| 167 | 160 | 7
|
| 2006-07 | 167 | 1
| 168 | 160 | 8
|
| 2007-08 | 167 | 7
| 174 | | |
The underspend against the Administration costs limit in 2004-05
contain the exceptional gain as referred to in the footnote to
the DEL table above.
Figures in the table have been adjusted to include the budget
and outturn for the Prime Minister's Delivery Unit, following
the transfer of that budget from the Cabinet Office, and will
differ from the figures in the 2007 Departmental Report accordingly.
12 November 2007
|