8 Conclusion
86. We broadly welcome the provisions set out in
the draft Bill. We have long argued that the port safety regime
should be made compulsory, on a statutory basis, and we regret
the fact that the Government has not taken this opportunity to
implement a statutory Port Safety Code. Nonetheless, the introduction
of new powers to issue directions to port and harbour authorities
and to specify minimum standards of competence for harbour masters
and pilots are a significant step in the right direction. We recommend
that the Secretary of State make active use of these new powers
to strengthen and support the existing safety regime, rather than
waiting until a problem emerges.
87. The provisions relating to General Lighthouse
Authorities are, for the most part, a sensible package intended
to clarify their powers and put beyond doubt the legal validity
of much of the essential work which they have been carrying out
for centuries. It was an anomaly in the Merchant Shipping Act
1995 that there was no sanction against local lighthouse authorities
which failed to comply with GLA directions, but in seeking to
rectify this anomaly the Government must avoid criminalising LLAs
for the failings of third parties.
88. We understand the desire to transfer GLA staff
to a pre-paid pension schemeit is in keeping with similar
moves elsewhere in the public and private sectorsbut we
do not think it should happen until a clear need to do so can
be demonstrated, and then only in consultation with those affected.
89. Finally, we welcome the Nairobi International
Convention on the Removal of Wrecks and the provision in the draft
Bill to give it statutory effect.. It will remove from the UK
taxpayer a significant potential liability in respect of wrecks
in UK waters.
|