Conclusions and Recommendations
1. By November 2007, the Department had paid
over £42 million in compensation to 4,400 former Icelandic
trawlermen and their dependents. The
scheme was complex to administer, and the Department made many
of the same mistakes that it made in managing its Coal Health
Compensation Scheme. The Department should set out the lessons
in this Committee's reports on these schemes and secure a marked
improvement in future schemes of this kind.
2. The Department did not properly consider
how it would obtain and assess the evidence needed to support
claims more than 20 years after the end of the 'Cod Wars'. The
Department should test the availability of evidence on real cases
before launching new compensation schemes.
3. The Department did not understand the working
practices of the fishing industry when designing the scheme. So
it set complex rules that were difficult to implement. The
Department should establish whether it has the appropriate industry
knowledge before setting the terms of grant schemes, and seek
relevant external advice if it does not.
4. The Department did not test the impact
of the scheme's rules on different types of applicant before launching
the scheme. The Department should pilot
the proposed rules using a cross section of different types of
applicant. It should use the results of this pilot to determine
what changes are needed to enable delivery of the scheme's objectives.
5. In 25 of 100 cases, there was insufficient
evidence to say whether payments made by the Department accorded
with the scheme's rules. The Department
needs to put explicit criteria and procedures in place to help
officials to exercise discretion on cases where the evidence may
be incomplete. Decisions and their justification should be fully
recorded.
6. The Department did not employ proper project
planning and risk management arrangements at the start of the
scheme. It needs to improve the project
delivery skills and experience of its managers and policy staff
by, for example, giving officials practical operational experience;
participating in the Professional Skills for Government programme;
and seconding staff into operational posts in the commercial sector.
|