Memorandum by the Dental Practitioners
Association (DS 28)
DENTAL SERVICES
INTRODUCTION AND
NOTES
1) The Dental Practitioners' Association
(DPA) welcomes this opportunity to submit evidence to the Health
Committee's Inquiry into NHS dental and orthodontic services.
2) The DPA (formerly GDPA) was formed in
1954 and is the largest body that represents dentists in general
practice. It consists of 1,000 practices containing 2,500 "high
street" dentists. Uniquely its Constitution requires that
the fifteen members of the principal executive committee and the
Chief Executive must be dentists.
3) Within a document of this length we regret
it is not possible to go into any detail regarding what might
be learned from variations on the old system (as in Scotland except
see para. 50)) or the variations on the new one (as in Wales and
shortly in Northern Ireland).
4) For the sake of clarity this document
will adopt the usual convention of referring to the arrangements
in England prior to 1 April 2006 as GDS and the subsequent system
as new GDS (nGDS). Similarly the piloting of various treatment
provision systems in the period leading up to April 2006 as PDS
and the fixed-term contract extensions awarded to early adopters
of the pilot schemes as nPDS.
5) Where this document refers to Primary
Care Trusts (PCTs) this includes Local Health Boards, insofar
as their contracting and commissioning functions are identical.
6) The lack of any reference to patients'
concerns should not be taken as a failure to acknowledge the distress
caused by gradual collapse of NHS dentistry. We expect that the
many organisations representing patients will make their case
elsewhere with our full support.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
7) Dentistry is a unique combination of
academic, manual and business skills. Very few other professions
require a combination of all three.
8) Much of the current public dissatisfaction
with the NHS dental services can be traced to a general decrease
in NHS activity by each dentist due to the disparity in terms
and conditions between the NHS and private sectors.
9) The dental contract imposed in April
2006 is characterised by inefficiency, inflexibility and unfairness
and has introduced a number of perverse incentives.
10) Dentists do not leave the NHS for financial
reasons. They invest the extra profit in improving their quality
of life by giving patients more time and using better quality
materials and laboratory work. On average a private dentist earns
£800 more each year than an NHS dentist.
11) The DPA sees a rôle for dentists
as the leaders of clinical teams with ultimate responsibility
for the patient's overall care. It is more efficient for dentists
to be confined to those procedures for which only they are qualified.
12) The key to prevention in dentistry is
to give the practitioner a stake in the savings made. For example,
a dentist who reduces his workload by (say) 20% due to prevention
must not suffer a drop in income of 20% (as under the present
and previous systems).
13) Once UDA targets were reached, it made
good commercial sense to bid for more UDAs and this has led to
a fall in the value of UDAs reflecting their lack of content.
We consider that the value of a UDA will fall somewhat until it
approaches the cost of production, at which time it will rise
consistent with free market conditions of excess demand over supply.
14) The DPA would welcome the return of
some form of registration of patients. Dentists do not like to
see their patients on an ad-hoc basis and patients like to know
who their dentist is and what rights they have. It is also consistent
with the preventive cohort system (see para. 46)).
15) The question of whether the new arrangements
represent adequate value for the taxpayer should be properly and
expeditiously put in front of the National Audit Office.
16) The Health Select Committee has no constraints
and, having given oral evidence in the past, the DPA respectfully
asks that it is called to give oral evidence on this occasion
as an organisation which is representative in the main area of
this Inquiry.
EVIDENCE
17) Dentistry is a unique combination of
academic, manual and business skills. Very few other professions
require a combination of all three.
18) DPA members in primary care are self-employed
subcontractors to the NHS. They own their own premises, employ
their own staff and pay their own expenses. Subject to a three-month
notice period they are free to do as much or as little NHS work
as they wish. As a result, there are significant differences in
their terms and conditions compared to salaried dentists and GPs.
19) In 1981, approximately half the current
number of dentists on the General Dental Council register treated
substantially the same population with no NHS access problems.
20) Much of the current public dissatisfaction
with the NHS dental services can be traced to a general decrease
in NHS activity by each dentist due to the disparity in terms
and conditions between the NHS and private sectors.
THE ROLE
OF PCTS
IN COMMISSIONING
DENTAL SERVICES
21) Prior to April 2006 Primary Care Trusts
and Local Health Boards cared little about the dental services
provided in their area. They played a minor part in the administration
of the system which included processing applications to join or
leave the area and had a rôle in inspection and testing.
22) From April 2006 PCTs have held the primary
dental care budget and as a result they are now interested in
dental provision. The handing-off of dental contracts to PCTs
has coincided with the closure of the dental budget. As a result
PCTs have a strong disincentive to expand dental provision to
that part of the population which does not normally attend. (See
also Perverse Incentives, para. 60))
23) During the piloting of schemes prior
to April 2006, the DoH indemnified PCTs against any shortfall
in patient charge revenue (PCR). This indemnity was withdrawn
for the scheme proper. As a result PCTs have a strong disincentive
to extend the service into areas of high need which may have low
levels of PCR. (See also Perverse Incentives, para. 60))
NUMBERS OF
NHS DENTISTS AND
THE NUMBERS
OF PATIENTS
REGISTERED WITH
THEM
24) The DoH has finally accepted after many
years that the number of dentists with NHS contracts bears no
relationship to the volume of dental services provided[59].
25) Since April 2006 there has been no registration
of patients. Any cipher (such as the number of patients who visited
a particular dentist in the last 24 months and have not seen another
dentist since) is likely to be highly malleable and to have been
arrived at because it gave the answer that was required.
26) Registration, measured using the new
yardstick, confers no rights on patients.
NUMBERS OF
PRIVATE SECTOR
DENTISTS AND
THE NUMBERS
OF PATIENTS
REGISTERED WITH
THEM
27) All dentists in primary care (other
than salaried dentists) are private sector dentists that sub-contract
work from the NHS.
28) The proportion of turnover derived from
private work is now greater than that from NHS work[60],
but because private fee income per patient has stabilised at around
three times that on the NHS, it is likely that NHS patients are
still in the majority.
29) Dentists do not leave the NHS for financial
reasons. They invest the extra profit in improving their quality
of life by giving patients more time and using better quality
materials and laboratory work. On average a private dentist earns
£800 more each year than an NHS dentist[61].
THE WORK
OF ALLIED
PROFESSIONS
30) It is the DoH policy following from
the Nuffield Report to hand off insofar as possible the routine
care of patients to allied professions.
31) There has been an increase in the rôle
of the allied professions in particular the hygienist/therapist
which is the practitioner thought most likely to be able to assume
the bulk of routine dental work currently carried out by highly
trained and expensive dentists.
32) To this end registration and regulation
of allied professions will be completed by July 2008.
33) The DPA sees a rôle for dentists
as the leaders of clinical teams with ultimate responsibility
for the patient's overall care. It is more efficient for dentists
to be confined to those procedures for which only they are qualified.
PATIENTS' ACCESS
TO NHS DENTAL
CARE
34) The new contract was supposed to halt
the drift of dentists away from the NHS. Every survey shows that
it has failed to do so and that patients' access continues to
deteriorate.
35) The abolition in April 2006 of charges
for failed appointments was an ill-advised attempt to bring NHS
dentistry in line with NHS practice. NHS dental patients accepted
charges as reasonable and necessary for the proper operation of
the appointment system and with very rare exception it worked
reliably and well. It was a model for the rest of the NHS, not
an aberration to be corrected.
36) The average dentist now loses time to
the value of 600 UDAs (approximately £12,000 turnover) as
a result. Failed appointments impede the access of other patients
and result in underperformance. Fifty-two per cent of our practices
report an increase in broken appointments averaging 35%.
THE QUALITY
OF CARE
PROVIDED TO
PATIENTS
37) There is a common fallacy regarding
dental work, which is that standards set by the General Dental
Council ensure the uniform quality of dental work, whether provided
on the NHS or privately.
38) The main differences between the quality
of NHS and private work lie in the amount of time taken and the
quality of materials and laboratory work. It is not true to say,
therefore, that an NHS crown is the same as a private crown, only
cheaper.
39) This misconception has led to many patients
clamouring for NHS treatment on the grounds that it represents
exceptional value for money. While that may be true, it is not
for the reason generally assumed and once this is explained properly,
far fewer patients choose NHS work.
40) It is incumbent upon any dentist to
do the best possible job under the circumstances; however NHS
constraints mean that the best possible job might not be the best
job possible. In this, dentistry is no different from any other
field of human endeavour.
THE EXTENT
TO WHICH
DENTISTS ARE
ENCOURAGED TO
PROVIDE PREVENTIVE
CARE AND
ADVICE
41) The mechanism of dental disease and
the steps necessary to prevent it are well known. Prevention in
dentistry works quickly, reliably and consistently.
42) Mechanisms exist in the private sector
to deliver preventive carein fact most third-party modified[62]
capitation plans are built round such systems.
43) There is no reason so far as the DPA
can see why NHS dentistry has not been modelled on an existing
preventive system other than the DoH's aversion to implementing
ideas that did not originate in-house.
44) A system of prevention in dentistry
would produce oral health gains and financial savings much faster
than could be expected in other medical specialities and would
serve as a model for the NHS generally.
45) The key to prevention in dentistry is
to give the practitioner a stake in the savings made. For example,
a dentist who reduces his workload by (say) 20% due to prevention
must not suffer a drop in income of 20% (as under the present
and previous systems).
46) Prevention is consistent with registration,
as a dentist must take responsibility for an improvement in the
oral health of a cohort of patients and keeps a percentage of
any savings made.
47) The so-called "5% reduction in
workload" was more than swallowed up by increased administration
and a greater than expected UDA target for children based on the
false assumption that they all attend twice each year. In the
current system no time is left for prevention.
48) To expect that a dentist will take time
out of a target-driven system to carry out prevention is wishful
thinking at best. Encouragement must come in the form of a system
that rewards prevention, not exhortation.
DENTISTS' WORKLOADS
AND INCOMES
49) The arrival of local commissioning calls
into question the purpose of a Review Body when there is no agreed
national pay rate, no universal scale of fees and 153 different
commissioning bodies in England alone.
50) The Scottish may still find a need for
an across the board pay increase but they have departed in many
other ways from a DDRB-led pay system for NHS dentists. Twenty
per cent of Scottish dentists' remuneration is now paid by way
of grants from an open-ended budget.
THE RECRUITMENT
AND RETENTION
OF NHS DENTAL
PRACTITIONERS
51) The DPA accepts that NHS recruitment
and retention do not give cause for concern if using the number
of dentists with an NHS contract as the yardstick. It is motivation
to work wholly or mainly within the NHS that is the problem.
52) Measures such as an increase in dental
student numbers, overseas recruitment and the returning workforce
are not expected to have a significant impact on NHS availability.
NHS DENTAL REFORMS
53) The dental contract imposed in April
2006 is characterised by inefficiency, inflexibility and unfairness
and has introduced a number of perverse incentives.
Inefficiency
54) The interpolation of a middle tier of
management was an expensive, unnecessary and retrograde step.
The desire to adopt a "command and control" attitude
to the provision of public services owes much to a failed central
Soviet style of management.
55) The question of whether the new arrangements
represent adequate value for the taxpayer should be properly and
expeditiously put in front of the National Audit Office.
56) Under the old system every dentist had
a direct interest in cost saving. Under the new system an entirely
different dynamic is operating, where expenditure is monitored
at a level far removed from the activity.
Inflexibility
57) Under the old system a dentist could
apply for permission to work in a PCT area and subject to a satisfactory
application be in post within a very few weeks. Under the new
system dentists may only apply where the budget exists and an
application may have to be deferred until the next financial year.
In the meantime the dentist may well apply elsewhere and a position
may remain unfilled.
Unfairness
58) During the period for three years from
April 2006 dentists will be paid a UDA value that is based on
their historic earnings. Dentists that used to carry out many
treatments per course will have high UDA values and dentists that
used to carry out very few treatments will have low UDA values.
59) While the DoH maintains that historic
treatment patterns will continue the DPA considers that this is
most unlikely as dentists have in the past shown no hesitation
to adapt to new ways of working. Dentists are having to meet identical
targets for different contract values (even within the same practice).
Perverse Incentives
60) The number of complex treatments per
course is dropping and this was flagged up as one of the intentions
of the DoH in introducing the April 2006 contract. However the
practitioner with a low UDA value and healthy patients will benefit
much less from this effect than his neighbour.
61) Dentists with high UDA values benefit
disproportionately by reducing their workloads. All dentists are
discouraged from taking patients with high needs and chasing UDA
targets conflicts with decisions based on clinical need. The disincentive
to carry out complex treatments results in a de-skilling of the
NHS workforce. These are a few examples of perverse incentives
introduced by the new system.
62) Young dentists are now more likely to
be delivering a core service of straightforward maintenance and
not gaining a broad base of experience in their early years.
NHS DENTAL REFORMSONE
YEAR ON
63) The notes below refer to a selection
of assertions in this document which we believe are misleading
or incorrect (figures in brackets refer to paragraph numbers in
the document).
64) [1.1] Dentists were drifting away
from the NHS but PCTs did not have the local funding to replace
them.
65) It is true that dentists were drifting
away from the NHS, however this was due to the increasing disparity
in terms and conditions between the NHS and private sectors and
not from lack of local funds.
66) [1.3] If a dentist ceases to provide
NHS services, the local NHS is now able to bring in new services
as a replacement.
67) Under GDS, funding followed the dentist,
so when a new dentist moved into a PCT area the funding was automatically
in place and the GDS budget was open-ended. Under the new system,
funding is closed which prohibits any attempt at increasing access.
Moreover if one dentist leaves, the PCT is left with the funding
for one dentist, even if three are needed in the area. The new
system is considerably worse than the old. PCTs would do well
to concentrate on commissioning in areas of high need as that
is all they are likely to be able to cover.
68) [1.4] PCTs have commissioned more
services than were delivered in the last year of the old contract.
69) Services are now measured in Units of
Dental Activity which are essentially empty courses of treatment.
The commissioning of such units does not address the drop-off
in treatment volume provided or the continuing access problems.
70) [1.5] There has generally been little
shortage of dentists offering to expand their services . . . and
an upward trend in the number of dentists providing NHS services.
71) The substitution of empty courses, for
treatment items as a measure of productivity has (as intended)
led to a temporary glut of UDAs. Initially dentists' appointment
books were freed up as they found they could earn their points
doing far fewer treatments. Rather than carrying out prevention
they naturally used the extra time to create more UDAs towards
their targets.
72) Once UDA targets were reached, it made
good commercial sense to bid for more UDAs and this has led to
a fall in the value of UDAs reflecting their lack of content.
We consider that the value of a UDA will fall somewhat until it
approaches the cost of production, at which time it will rise
consistent with free market conditions of excess demand over supply.
73) [2.1] the location and volume of
services were previously decided by dentists, not by the NHS.
74) Under the old system dentists took responsibility
for establishing practices in areas that were dictated by the
rules of the system in which they worked. These were mainly areas
of high demand, since income depended on fees earned and we are
still waiting for a satisfactory explanation of how to convert
need into demand.
75) Dentists had a direct personal stake
in the success of their practices and their large degree of autonomy
meant that the relatively low business risk encouraged them to
work within the NHS where they subsidised NHS practice in many
cases from their private sector work.
76) It is not true to say that the "fee-per-item
system created incentives for more invasive and complex treatment
and increased costsnot consistent with reducing disease
incidence[63]".
Due to the surplus of demand over supply there was no incentive
to create unnecessary treatment.
77) Under the new system, Primary Care Trusts
dictate to dentists where they will work, which patients they
will see and to whom they must sell their practice in case of
ill-health or retirement.
78) The factors above have led to an increase
in business risk which discourages most dentists from working
wholly or mainly within the NHS.
POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS
VOUCHER SYSTEM
79) The Dental Practitioners Association
(formerly the GDPA) has long been associated with a system of
healthcare known variously as Grant in Aid or the Voucher System.
80) In this system the state makes a core
contribution leaving dentists free to set their fees based on
the service they wish to supply. As now, some dentists would work
for core fees (for patients who are fully remitted or exempt or
who want a basic NHS service) and other practices where patients
would need to make a larger co-payment if (for example) they wanted
a better quality material or prosthesis approaching private standards.
81) The patients' copayment would consist
of their NHS charge plus any optional costs agreed with the dentist
for better quality materials or laboratory work.
82) Before reading the following table it
might be helpful to review para. 37 regarding the common fallacy
about universal treatment standards.
Table 1
OBJECTIONS TO A VOUCHER SYSTEM WITH COUNTER
ARGUMENTS
| 83) It is divisivethe NHS is predicated on the idea of a universal standard of health care. If it is good enough for me it is good enough for you.
| | 84) This conspires against freedom of choice in health care and is a "levelling-down" argument.
|
| 85) Thanks to GDC standards, NHS care is as good as private care only cheaper.
| | 86) See para. 37.
|
| 87) The wealthy and intelligent must be forced to use the NHS as they are the only ones who will insist that standards are kept high.
| | 88) You cannot force anyone to use the NHS, and certainly not for the reason quoted.
|
| 89) If the NHS caters for only part of the population then economies of scale will be lost for those which remain.
| | 90) As people leave the NHS more money is left to treat those who remain. The NHS is more than large enough to retain economies of scale.
|
| 91) NHS money is being used to subsidise the private sector.
| | 92) All self-employed dentists work in the private sector and are subcontracted by the NHS.
|
| 93) Dentists would use the variable copayment to confuse and overcharge vulnerable patients.
| | 94) This is a straightforward disciplinary issue.
|
REGISTRATION
95) The DPA would welcome the return of some form of
registration of patients. Dentists do not like to see their patients
on an ad-hoc basis and patients like to know who their dentist
is and what rights they have. It is also consistent with the preventive
cohort system (see para. 46)).
96) The contrived mechanism of recording the number of
patients who attended within the last 24 months (and who have
not seen another dentist) satisfies neither practices nor the
patients.
CONSCRIPTION
97) The DPA strongly recommends against extending the
already unpopular "command and control" approach further,
by requiring every dentist to complete a stint in the NHS. An
objective analysis of most dentists' lifetime NHS commitment will
show that dentists already voluntarily work for the NHS far more
than could reasonably be required of them under any scheme of
conscription.
98) A conscription scheme would be disastrous for morale
and have to overcome serious obstacles in relation to the symmetrical
treatment of other groups trained at public expense but not currently
forced to work in the public sector during periods of shortage.
ORAL EVIDENCE
99) To sum up the problems of the current system and
possible solutions in such a short document has been a considerable
challenge and inevitably there are many important areas which
have suffered.
100) Regulation 19 of the National Health Service (General
Dental Services) Regulations 1992 imposes a requirement on the
Secretary of State to consult with an organisation that is most
representative of dentists working within the GDS. Note the use
of the word "an". This has been used by DoH to exclude
organisations such as the DPA from supporting and representing
our members on terms and conditions, to the detriment of all concerned
including our NHS patients.
101) The Health Select Committee has no constraints and,
having given oral evidence in the past, the DPA respectfully asks
that it is called to give oral evidence on this occasion as an
organisation which is representative in the main area of this
Inquiry.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
102) The Dental Practitioners' Association welcomes the
opportunity to discuss this document with any interested party.
103) The lead practitioner on this document is: Dr Derek
Watson BDS LDS RCS DGDP, CEO, Dental Practitioners Association.
December 2007
59
"The numbers of dentists providing NHS services is a relatively
weak indicator: it is the volume of services they provide for
the NHS that is more important" DoH evidence to 37th Review
Body, para. 6.11 Back
60
Source: National Association of Specialist Dental Accountants,
figures for April 2005-March 2006. Back
61
Source: Information Centre for Health and Social Care. Back
62
Third-party capitation plans are called "modified" because
the risk that patients might suffer a catastrophic dental accident
is subcontracted to an insurer. Back
63
DoH evidence to 37th Report of DDRB Back
|