1 Introduction
Scope
of this report
1. This report is a review of the Home Affairs Committee's
activities during the calendar year 2007. We begin with an overview
of the main developments in 2007 and then present an analysis
of the Committee's performance in relation to the indicative 'core
tasks' for select committees specified by the Liaison Committee.
We conclude with some comments on our working practices and on
our relations with the Home Office.
Overview of the Committee's activities
in 2007
2. Our principal remit, set out in House of Commons
standing orders, is "to examine the expenditure, administration
and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies".[1]
In carrying out our remit we aim to strike a balance between undertaking
inquiries into major policy issues, examining the Department's
discharge of its duties across the range of its activitiesincluding
legislation and legislative proposalsand responding rapidly
to important developments relating to the work of the Home Office
and that of its associated public bodies.
3. Our major activities this year have been the completion
of our inquiries into Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) Issues
at European Union Level and Young Black People and the
Criminal Justice System; our inquiry into the Government's
Counter-Terrorism Proposals; on which we reported in December
2007, and an inquiry we have called A Surveillance Society?
which we aim to complete early in 2008. A full list of subjects
into which we inquired is set out in the table below.
Table 1: Subjects covered by the Home Affairs Committee in 2007
| Subject
| Evidence sessions in 2007
| Outcome
|
| Young Black People and the Criminal Justice System
| 4 |
Report, May 2007[2]
|
| Justice and Home Affairs Issues at EU Level
| 3 |
Report, June 2007[3]
|
| Police Funding | 1
| Report, July 2007[4]
|
| The Government's Counter-Terrorism Proposals
| 6 |
Report, December 2007[5]
|
| A Surveillance Society?
| 5 |
Report to be published |
| The Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU: twelve months on
| 1 |
Report, January 2008[6]
|
| The Security Industry Authority: Licensing of Applicants
| 1 |
Report, January 2008[7]
|
| Knife Crime | 1
| Evidence, March 2007 |
| Towards Effective Sentencing
| 1 |
Evidence, May 2007 |
| The Future of the Home Office
| 1 |
Evidence, April 2007 |
| The Work of the Home Office 2007
| 1 |
Evidence, July 2007 |
| UK Immigration Issues |
1 | Evidence, November 2007
|
| Home Office Annual Report 2007
| 1 |
Evidence, December 2007 |
| The Government's Counter-Terrorism Bill
| 1 |
Evidence, December 2007 |
| Police Pay | 1
| Evidence, December 2007
|
4. During 2007, we went on a number of visits, as set out in Table
2 below. Our inquiry into Justice and Home Affairs Issues at
EU Level included a visit to the headquarters of Frontex,
the new European border control agency, in Warsaw. Our time in
Warsaw gave us a useful insight into the work of what was then
a young organisation, and the subject of some controversy. Our
major overseas visit of 2007, to Washington DC, Annapolis and
Baltimore, proved invaluable in gathering information in connection
with two inquiries: A Surveillance Society? and the Government's
Counter-Terrorism Proposals. In particular, meetings with
interlocutors at the Department of Homeland Security and the Department
of Justice informed our examination of the Government's proposal
that further consideration be given to the admission of intercept
material as evidence in court.
5. We undertook the last of our visits in connection
with our inquiry into Young Black People and the Criminal Justice
System early in 2007, when we spent a day at Her Majesty's
Young Offenders Institute, Feltham. Once again we came away with
much that helped us as we completed our inquiry, and we look forward
to a series of visits within the UK to gather information for
our inquiry into Domestic Violence.
6. We are most grateful to all of those who hosted
us during our visits and in particular we thank the Foreign and
Commonwealth Office, the National Parliament Office in Brussels
and the staff of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, Rights,
Liberties and Guarantees of the Assembleia da República,
Portugal, for their assistance.
Table 2: Visits by the Home Affairs Committee in 2007
| Location
| Purpose of visit
|
| Her Majesty's Young Offenders Institute, Feltham
| Inquiry into Young Black People and the Criminal Justice System
|
| Warsaw, Poland | Inquiry into Justice and Home Affairs Issues at EU Level
|
| Lisbon, Portugal | Visit by the Chairman in a representative capacity to attend Portuguese EU Presidency Conference of Justice and Home Affairs Committees
|
| Washington DC, Annapolis and Baltimore
| Inquiries into A Surveillance Society? and The Government's Counter-Terrorism Proposals
|
| Brussels | Visit by Mr Gary Streeter in a representative capacity to attend the Joint Committee Meeting of the LIBE Committee, European Parliament, and National Parliaments[8]
|
7. In 2007 we have continued to explore new ways of working, and
to extend the range of the Committee's work, by undertaking some
shorter inquiries and holding one-off evidence sessions on topical
issues, in addition to our more detailed scrutiny of major policy
areas (see below at paragraph 54).
8. Machinery of Government changes in 2007 had significant
implications for the work of the Committee. On 29 March 2007 the
Home Office took on additional responsibilities in relation to
security and counter-terrorism, and a transfer of responsibility
for prisons, probation and sentencing to the new Ministry of Justice
took effect on 9 May. The Machinery of Government changes announced
in June 2007which created the Department for Children,
Schools and Familieshave also had an impact on policy areas,
such as Youth Justice, which are relevant to our work.
9. The Home Office and the Ministry of Justice share
a core focus on public protection and crime reduction; the effect
of Machinery of Government changes and their main areas of responsibility
are indicated in the table below.
Table 3: Main Departmental responsibilities following Machinery of Government changes in 2007
| Policy area
| Effect of Machinery of Government changes on Departmental responsibility
|
| Security and counter-terrorism
| Remains with the Home Office (which is to play an enhanced role)
|
| Policing | Remains with the Home Office
|
| Anti-social behaviour |
Remains with the Home Office
|
| Drugs | Remains with the Home Office
|
| Crime reduction | Remains with the Home Office
|
| Immigration, asylum and identity
| Remains with the Home Office
|
| Criminal law and sentencing
| Transferred to the Ministry of Justice
|
| Offender management |
Transferred to the Ministry of Justice
|
| Re-offending | Transferred to the Ministry of Justice
|
| Prisons and probation |
Transferred to the Ministry of Justice
|
10. Having embarked on a major inquiry into Towards Effective
Sentencing in February 2007, we had received a substantial
amount of written evidence and taken oral evidence from Rt Hon
Lord Woolf, former Lord Chief Justice, when the Machinery of Government
changes took effect: it was with some regret that we ceased our
work in this area. Before publishing the evidence we took the
step of passing it to the then Constitutional Affairs Committee;
we are glad to see that the new Justice Committee has taken up
this inquiry alongside its scrutiny of draft Sentencing Guidelines
issued under the authority of the Sentencing Guidelines Council,
which was also formerly within the remit of the Home Affairs Committee.
11. On 24 April we took evidence on the implications
of the Machinery of Government changes from the then Home Secretary,
Rt Hon John Reid MP. We heard part of this evidencethat
which concerned the context in which the Home Office was to take
on a strengthened role in relation to counter-terrorismin
private. The Home Office subsequently provided us with a memorandum
on how the Machinery of Government changes have been implemented
and in 2008 we will continue to monitor the effect of the transfer
of functions and responsibilities on those policy and operational
areas within our remit.[9]
1 Until the beginning of the current Session of Parliament,
the Committee was charged with inquiring into the administration
and expenditure of the Attorney General's Office, the Treasury
Solicitor's Department, the Crown Prosecution Service and the
Serious Fraud Office (but excluding individual cases and appointments
and advice given within government by Law Officers). These responsibilities
passed to the Justice Committee (formerly the Constitutional Affairs
Committee) as a consequence of Machinery of Government changes
in May 2007. Back
2
Second Report of Session 2006-07 (HC 181) Back
3
Third Report of Session 2006-07 (HC 76) Back
4
Fourth Report of Session 2006-07 (HC 553) Back
5
First Report of Session 2007-08 (HC 43) Back
6
Second Report of Session 2007-08 (HC 59) Back
7
Third Report of Session 2007-08 (HC 144) Back
8
See below at para 57 Back
9
The Future of the Home Office: oral and written evidence
(HC 499-i), published 26 October 2007 Back
|