Written Evidence submitted by Sergei Cristo
1. Here are some important points which,
in my view, should be taken by the Committee into account whilst
considering its recommendations about the future of the BBC World
Service in Russia.
INTRODUCTION
2. I am a naturalised British citizen born
in the Soviet Union. I have closely followed the work of the BBC
World Service in Russia for the last 14 years. From 1993 to 2000
I worked at the BBC as a radio producer and a journalist, engaged
at various times by the BBC World Service Trust, the BBC Central
Asian Service, the BBC Russian Service and BBC Television (Panorama)
before leaving journalism to become a specialist in financial
marketing and public relations. Nevertheless, since then I have
retained many informal personal contacts at the BBC, who kept
me well informed of the progress made by the BBC World Service
in Russia.
CONCERNS
3. There are serious concerns about the
BBC World Service's strategy of broadcasting in Russia through
state-owned media networks, which I believe inevitably puts the
Corporation's reputation for impartial news at risk in Russia.
4. It is my view that the BBC Russian Service's
output is generally more balanced and reliable than from the average
Russian media outlet. However, it is often weaker than the main
BBC News in reporting on Russia
5. Earlier this year, The Daily Telegraph
published an article by Andrew Pierce giving a good summary of
some recent claims, entitled "Dissidents say BBC caved
in to Moscow". Here is an extract from the article:
6. "Leading dissidents from the
former Soviet Union have demanded an investigation into the BBC
Russian Service, which they have accused of caving in to pressure
to be less critical of President Vladimir Putin's regime.
7. They have written to Mark Thompson,
the BBC director-general, demanding an examination of what they
claim is a string of examples of pro-Putin bias on the taxpayer-funded
service, which has a weekly audience of two million. (...
)
8. The dissidents' letter states: "At
a time when Britain needs a strong voice in Russia more than at
any point over the past decade, the taxpayer-funded BBC Russian
Service radio seems to have considerably mellowed in its tone
towards the Russian government".
9. By design or by neglect, it has become
more accommodating of Russian government views, dispensing with
difficult questions and denying a platform to some critics.
10. Is the BBC Russian Service trying
to soften up its news coverage mindful of the Kremlin's ever-watchful
eye over the airwaves? The UK taxpayer funds the BBC World Service
so that Britain can have a strong voice in the world and it should
not be compromised."
(Source: The Daily Telegraph, 1 January
2007)
11. Having following the Russian Service's
news coverage around the time of the ruthless murder of Alexander
Litvinenko, I totally agree with the claims.
12. The BBC Russian Service has this year
commenced a joint venture with the Big Radio network and
The Voice of Russia, a propaganda news radio station, both
owned by the Russian government. For some years now, the BBC Russian
Service has been signing re-broadcasting contracts with numerous
Russian radio stations, all under the ultimate control of the
Kremlin. It is not surprising that, according to my sources at
the BBC Russian Service, its journalists have to be much more
careful now of what they say in their reports. Having entrusted
the transmission of its programmes to radio channels owned by
the Russian authorities, the BBC faces a constant risk of being
taken off the air by them when they consider it appropriate. This
is exactly what happened during the Litvinenko crisisthe
BBC Russian Service was silenced in Moscow and St Petersburg.
13. Another unfortunate problem faced by
the Russian Service in the aftermath of the Cold War is the influx
of professional Soviet journalists. During the Cold War the BBC
World Service has operated, together with the relevant British
government agencies, pre-employment screening in order to prevent
KGB agents infiltrating the organisation. However, after the Cold
War the BBC Russian Service started to actively recruit professional
journalists from Russia, which gradually resulted in a few journalists
with dubious past reaching key posts at the World Service. I am
absolutely certain that they play a major part in routinely denying
a platform to some of the biggest critics of the Kremlin, such
as Akhmed Zakaev, the Chechen envoy in London and others.
14. The BBC has also censored critics in
order to avoid problems with the Russian authorities. Moscow is
known to delay or refuse visas to certain foreign journalists
and restrict their access in other ways. In a memorandum to key
news editors, Alan Quartly, asked "can we pass onto programmes
not to use Akhmed Zakaev (Chechen envoy in London) as a guest...
The Russians regard him as a terrorist and are seeking his extradition
from the UK, where he currently has political asylum... The Russian
government [sic] keeps an eagle eye on when the BBC talks to him
and then tries to use it against us here in Moscow. There is currently
a bit of an issue with the foreign ministry about a past interview
with him on the BBC Russian Service website. It would be good
not to aggravate this" (a copy of this memo is attached).
[104]
OBJECTIVES
15. It is in Britain's interests to strengthen
the BBC Russian Service. The bottom line must be that unless its
broadcasts are as robust in examining the Russian regime as the
main BBC News, they should not be funded by the British taxpayer.
16. Whilst developing relationships with
local Russian radio stations was a good idea under the Yeltsin
government, when the Russian media enjoyed relative freedom and
editorial independence from the authorities, in Putin's Russia
this approach no longer makes any sense. The BBC World Service
must not be allowed to trade impartiality for access.
RECOMMENDATIONS
17. One way of strengthening the BBC Russian
Service's independence from the Russian authorities is for the
Corporation to invest considerably more in their medium wave transmitters
(which are currently too weak) and step up its campaign for its
own licence to broadcast on FM frequency in Moscow and St Petersburgin
line with its competitor, the US-funded Radio Liberty.
18. In addition, the Foreign Office, instead
of distancing itself from the problem, should have the right of
veto over the choice of re-broadcasters in Russia and reject any
deals that could potentially put the BBC's editorial independence
under pressure from the Kremlin.
19. Finally, the BBC World Service must
re-think its policy of hiring career journalists in Russia and
make sure that the integrity of its news output is properly protected
by stringent editorial standards enforced by experienced BBC journalists
who have been educated in this country.
Sergei Cristo
June 2007
104 Not printed. Back
|