Examination of Witness (Questions 240-259)
Mr David Blair
14 August 2003
Q240 Sir Philip Mawer:
You were following the trails?
Mr David Blair:
We were following the trail. So what we did in the space of
a few hours was we put togetherwe completedthe
links in the paper trail. We put it all together. And then it
became obvious to me what the follow-up story was, which was the
reply, Saddam's reply to the document forwarded to his office
by the Mukhabarat chief. So that formed the material for the second
day's story.
Q241 Sir Philip Mawer:
Focusing on the firstI mean, I have here a photocopy
of the Telegraph of the twenty-second of April with the documents
in it translated,[9]
the translation of the key document in it. And theyou said
a moment ago that Mr Galloway had said he, you know, wanted more
money. I'm paraphrasing, but my impression of the document is
that it was Mr Zureikat who was the envoy of Mr Galloway, who
was the channel for the alleged expression of Mr Galloway's views
and wishes. That was that document
Mr David Blair: I
think I recall rightly that in the second half of the document
there is a description of a meeting in which Galloway was a participant,
allegedly, taking place on Boxing Day '99.
Q242 Sir Philip Mawer:
This is the Boxing Day '99 meeting?
Mr David Blair: Yes
and my recollection is that the document outlined Mr Galloway
himself making a request first of all for a greater share of the
profitsI'm just speaking from memory herea greater
share of the profits from oil sales, and secondly for contracts
with a number of named Iraqi government ministries
Q243 Sir Philip Mawer:
Correct. Both are correct. You are correct in what you've just
said and there's also a recording in the sameor a reference
in the beginning of the same documentto Mr Zureikat making
various requests on behalf of, as it appears, Mr Galloway. So
the
you obviously subsequently visited the foreign ministry
building because we saw the Channel 4 footage?
Mr David Blair:
Exactly. Yes.
Q244 Sir Philip Mawer:
You got past the guards at that point?
Mr David Blair: Yes.
What happened was that I was rung up by the BBC and various other
people and I arranged to meet them outside the foreign ministry.
I think it was at about lunchtime on the Tuesday. The camera crews
sweet-talked the guards and allowed them to
and they decided
to let us in. So I went in with several camera crews in tow.
And you saw exactly what I did. I showed them round and showed
them the room where I found it.
Q245 Sir Philip Mawer:
Right. The documents were under your control at all points following
your discovery of themquestion?
Mr David Blair: Yes,
from the moment I discovered the crucial document, which was late
on Saturday night,[10]
that particular file stayed with me.[11]
At one stage I was even carrying it around under my arm. I must
have looked rather strange carrying this thing around. So they
stayed with me.
Q246 Sir Philip Mawer: And
you mentioned, earlier in our conversation, that at one point
youthat immediately after you'd first found the documents
you left them in your hotel room but had locked the door.
Mr David Blair:
That's right.
Q247 Sir Philip Mawer:
There was no evidence that, I mean, could they have been tampered
with during that period?
Mr David Blair:
No. I don't think so.
Q248 Sir Philip Mawer:
There was no sign of
Mr David Blair:
No. But at that stage the hotel I was staying in was not being
too assiduous about having cleaners going into rooms and sprucing
them up.
Q249 Sir Philip Mawer:
There was no
Mr David Blair:
I don't believe anyone entered the room in my absence.
Q250 Sir Philip Mawer: And
you eventually got the documents, brought the documents back here?
Mr David Blair:
Yes, what we decided was that I would take all the documents
relating to Britain, including obviously the crucial file. I would
bring those back with me. I would leave everything else, which
was principally the material relating to France, for my successor
to look at. My successor arrivedAlex Spillius arrivedI
think it was on the Wednesday
Q251 Sir Philip Mawer:
The twenty-third?
Mr David Blair: Yes.
I went to see him on Wednesday evening, taking all the French
material. I gave it to him at the Palestine Hotel, put them
in his room at the Palestine Hotel. And then very early on the
Thursday morning at about six am I left for Kuwait. Thethere
were five folders in all, pale blue folders relating to Britain.
So I had those packed in my bags and I droveweit
was a rather complicated journeyI drove with my photographer
so that we would have a witness if anything went wrong. We drove
to Nasaria in Southern Iraq. There I met another Telegraph correspondent
who had been in Basra but was leaving the country. I transferred
into his vehicle. We drove together to Kuwait City. We spent that
night in Kuwait City in the Marmot Hotel. The following morning
we got a flight to London.
Q252 Sir Philip Mawer: Thank
you. Can I just ask youI mean, thank you for that very
full and detailed account. I mean it's impossible, of course,
reading your reports[12]excellent
though they areto get that kind of flavour of the details
Mr David Blair:
Sure. Of course, of course.
Q253 Sir Philip Mawer:
which, you know, again, is important when you're coming
to assess the weight of the circumstantial evidence. Mr Galloway's
main response to the alleged content of the documents has been
to deny that he's ever received any moneypersonally. He
always make that, I think, distinction personally, emphasises
that point. And he's suggested that they are forgeries. Now we've
dealt with the forgery question and, I mean, as regards receiving
the money personally, that's a matter which only he can reply
to. I can't, it's notI'm thinking out loud hereit's
not fair for me to ask you a question about that because you were
not in a position to know. It's a matter for him and forindeed
I have already put the question to him about that, questions about
that. Which I think brings me just to one other area that I'd
like to just touch on with you which is briefly, and I did flag
this up earlier, the question of what we know about Mr Zureikat.
He seems a key figure in this story.
Mr David Blair:
Yes.
Q254 Sir Philip Mawer:
(a) because if the document is correct, you know, heI
mean, well (a) Mr Galloway has never denied, I think, the authenticity
of the letter[13]
which nominates Mr Zureikat as his representative in Baghdad.
I've never seen any such denial. Again I await any, await a formal
response from him about that. But
Mr David Blair:
My beliefI'd have to check thisbut my belief is
that when our parliamentary correspondent spoke to him he confirmed
the authenticity of that letter.
Q255 Sir Philip Mawer:
Well I'm certainI've put it more negativelyanyway
nobody has, I think, called it into question.
Mr David Blair: And
that was stapled to the crucial one. It was actually attached
to it and actually stapled
Q256 Sir Philip Mawer:
To the Iraqi
the intelligence?
Mr David Blair:
It was actually stapled to and referred to in that document.
Q257 Sir Philip Mawer: Right.
So he's crucial from that perspective. He's crucial because he
features in the key document, as you've described it. And he's
crucial because it appears that he was the meansnot only
was he the representative, as it were, but he was the meansthrough
which, if what the documents allege is correct, the money was
got to Mr Galloway or to causes which he favoured.
Mr David Blair:
Yes
Q258 Sir Philip Mawer: And
it is, of course, one possible explanation of the content of the
papers not that the money was being put into Mr Galloway's own
pocket, but that it was going to support activities whichin
whichMr Galloway was very much involvedthe Mariam
Appeal and British Iraq Friendship Society and so on, whichin
whichMr Galloway was a key figure, so that he was reaping
the benefit indirectly, if you like, in that way. I've read,
obviously, what's been in the paper about Mr Zureikat. Is there
anything more you can, you know, tell me about him as a figure,
from your knowledge of Iraq, Baghdad and so on? Have you, did
you, come across him as a figure? As Alda's just said you were
in Amman for a period. Mr Galloway paints him as a prominent,
you know, Middle East businessman.
Mr David Blair: The
first I heard of him was when I saw him referred to in the documents
which I have described. I never heard of him before then. Subsequently
friends of mine, other journalists, said to me that yes they knew
him and that yes he had helped them at various stages to get visas
to go to Iraq. So I think that what Galloway was saying was essentially
accurate. He had helped quite a lot of journalists.
Q259 Sir Philip Mawer:
So he's a man who had contacts in Iraq, that would suggestI
mean, he knew people in high places who could swing things in
the
whether it was visas or whatever?
Mr David Blair:
Yes, yes. Subsequently friends of mine came to me and said "Oh
yes, we know Fawaz quite well, he helped me to get a visa on this
occasion." And there were quite a number of people who he
had helped in that way. But not me. I never, I never, I'd never
heard of the guy at all.
9 Volume II, WE 1, 4-6. Back
10
Note from the Witness:I should have said 'late on Sunday
night'. Back
11
Note from the Witness:I should, perhaps, have mentioned
that there was a period of between 1 and 2 hours on Wednesday
23 April, the day after we first published the story, during which
I felt it best to entrust the relevant folder to a close friend
and colleague. At the time, I was the focus of considerable media
attention. This made me feel vulnerable and fear for the security
of the folder. I was anxious that someone might seize it from
me or attempt to break into my hotel room. So I entrusted it to
Philip Reeves of the Independent newspaper. He was staying in
the same hotel as me on the floor below. Throughout this brief
period he kept the folder with him in his locked hotel room. Back
12
Volume II, WE 1 and 4-8. Back
13
Volume II, WE 6. Back
|