Examination of Witness (Questions 180-199)
Mr David Blair
14 August 2003
Q180 Sir Philip Mawer: And
of course I read your accounts in the paper of these things but
really I need to go to the primary source on all these occasions,
wherever possible, and you are the primary source. I've had the
opportunity, thanks to your colleagues, of seeing the files on
a previous occasion and clearly they, you know, areas you
yourself mentioned in that Channel 4 interview we just saw a recording
of a moment agothere are various circumstantial features
of them which, put together, are powerful indicators, as it were,
of the veracity of your account of the circumstances in which
you found them. But it will be helpful to have that account from
yourself directly.
Mr David Blair:
Sure. Absolutely.
Q181 Sir Philip Mawer:
Can I start with just some basic questions about when you actually
wentwhen you were first postedto Baghdad? You mentioned
a moment ago that you first went there in April of 2002, did you
say?
Mr David Blair:
That's right, yes. I was actuallyI was reporting from
Israel during Operation Defensive Shield and while I was in Jerusalem
the foreign desk here was offered the opportunity of an Iraqi
visa for someone to go and cover Saddam Hussein's 65th birthday
party. So they contacted me in Israel and said that that's what
I should do. So I travelled there via Amman, collecting my visa
in Amman, my Iraqi visa in Amman, and going on from there to
Baghdad.
Q182 Sir Philip Mawer:
Right. And your return thereyou presumably returned there
to cover the war at some point earlier this year?
Mr David Blair:
Yes, that's right. I in fact went backwards and forwards several
times. First visit was in April 2002. Second visit was in October
2002 for the referendum that the Iraqis held on Saddam's rule.
Visit number three was in late November 2002. What happened was,
after the referendum in October the foreign editor decided that
I should spend as much time in Iraq as I could. So once my visa
in Iraq had expired and renewalsonce renewals were not
forthcomingI would leave Iraq, come back to London, seek
another visa, go back and that's what happened. So I returned
in November 2002. I stayed for about two weeks on that occasion.
Came back to London. Went through the process of seeking another
visa and went there again in late January 2003. And this was obviously
in the run up to the war. It was quite clear that the conflict
was approaching so I managed to stay in Baghdad and had my visa
renewed several times over. And I stayed right up until March
the 18thI think that's rightwhen the paper took
a decision to withdraw me. They decided that no Telegraph correspondents
were going to be in Baghdad during the war itself, for obvious
reasons. So I left. I went to Jordan. I stayed in Jordan during
the course of the conflict and then I was under instructions that
once American forces reached Baghdad and appeared to secure the
city then I should return as soon as possible. And I returned
to Baghdad on Friday the 11th of April. If you recall the famous
statue fell on Wednesday, Wednesday the 9th. I returned on Friday
the 11th having travelled in a convoy with quite a large number
of other journalists from Amman. We actually departed on Thursday
and ended up spending the night in the desert on the Jordanian
side of the border. We arrived late on Friday afternoon.
Q183 Sir Philip Mawer:
Right. And so it would be fair to say that by the time these
particular events which are the focus of my interview with you
occurred, you'd been several times to Baghdad and you were familiar
with the geography of the place and so on?
Mr David Blair:
Yes I added it up the other day, actuallyI was on my fifth
visit and I'd spent about three months in total in the country.
Q184 Sir Philip Mawer:
Had you had cause in the course of your previous visits to, you
know, become interested in Mr Galloway as a feature in the Iraqi
scene? Had he been someone on whose activities you'd had cause
to report on previous occasions?
Mr David Blair:
There was only one previous occasion. During my first visit to
Baghdad. At the end of that time Mr Galloway happened to be in
Baghdad on one of his regular visits and he brought quite a large
number of journalists with him. I think he brought eight or nine
journalists and I learnt that he'd arrived in Baghdad, that he
was staying at the Al Rashid hotel. And I went there with another
journalist, Ewen Mackaskill, the diplomatic editor of the Guardian.
We went there together and we met George Galloway together and
we had a talk with him for about half an hour or so in the coffee
shop of the Al Rashid hotel. And later that evening Mr Galloway
plus the ten or eleven journalists he had brought with himI
think there were a couple of Labour MPs with him as well, now
I come to think of it there were a couple of Labour MPsthey
all went out to dinner at a restaurant and we joined them and
we were part of the group of I guess about a dozen people, so
we had dinner and I exchanged a few words with Mr Galloway over
dinner as well.
Q185 Sir Philip Mawer:
Did you report on that visit for the paper? And was there .
. .
Mr David Blair:
I wrote one story, a short storynot a great example of
journalismabout one incident which was while I was talking
to Galloway in the coffee shop of the Al Rashid hotel who should
walk in but Jorg Haider. So I wrote a frankly rather trivial story
about Galloway keeping slightly strange company in Baghdad and
that was the one occasion that I had written a story about him.
I think there was a subsequent travel piece I wrote about Baghdad
where I referred to the same incident in a paragraph somewhere
towards the end of the story and that was a long time ago I wrote
it.
Q186 Sir Philip Mawer:
And were you interested in his activities in Baghdad from that
moment on, as it were? Or was he just another regular feature
of the scene but of no particular interest?
Mr David Blair:
He was of no particular interest to me. I've lived abroad really
pretty much continuously since August '98 so I must confess that
British politics is not a subject I follow in great detail. I'm
very out of date. I'm not sure I could actually name every member
of the cabinet, I'm ashamed to say.
Q187 Sir Philip Mawer:
Well, nor could most of the British people!
Mr David Blair:
So Labour politicians are not people whose careers I follow, I'm
afraid
Q188 Sir Philip Mawer: Right.
So, can I ask, when you went back to Baghdadthis is for
your visit on the 11th April after the US troops had secured Baghdad
and it was safe for you to returnwere you given any particular
briefing in connection with your return, by the paper or by anybody
else for that matter? Were you given any particular ... focus?
Mr David Blair:
No, I wasn't, and the reason for that was that the situation
in Baghdad was so extraordinary with the city being looted, with
no-one being in control at all, with the state of anarchy the
city was in. It was really obvious what I was there to do. The
stories, as it were, fell from the trees.
Q189 Sir Philip Mawer:
Exactly. They weren't difficult to find?
Mr David Blair:
They weren't difficult to find. The first story I covered was
the attack on the museumthe extensive looting of the museum.
I did that on the Saturday morning, the day after I arrived.
And on the very first day I arrived I wrote a story just about
the journey into Baghdad itself because, although the Americans
had secured an area in the heart of the city, most of the city
was really under no-one's control whatsoever and the guns were
walking around and there was lots of shooting, so it was really
obvious to me what I was there to do.
Q190 Sir Philip Mawer: How
were you supported? I'm interested in how you met your translators
and so on. Were they people you'd worked with before during previous
visits? Or
Mr David Blair:
They weren't, no. Really the situation in Baghdad had just been
transformed beyond recognition. When I arrived in the city it
was an extraordinary situation. I mean what struck me most was
the way in which no-one really knew what was going on. The Americans
didn't quite know whether they had secured the city and whether
the war was over or not. The Iraqis didn't really know whether
the regime had really fallen or not. The only things that were
obvious were that no-one was in control and there was no government
and the familiar faces who I had known in Baghdad pre-war were
nowhere to be seen. Tragically, in fact, the driver who I'd employed
several times, had go to know extremely wellwas
when I arrived, I learned that he was missing. And a few days
later I learned that he had been killed in the last days of the
war. So what happened was, I did what journalists tend to do in
those situations: I met other journalists who I knew well. I met
a journalist from The Daily Mail who I knew very well on that
night, the first night I arrived, the Friday night. I said "I
need to find a driver and a translator." He said "I'm
leaving tomorrow you can have my driver, he's a good man."
So, on his recommendation I hired his driver on Saturday morning.
Then I said to the driver "I need a translator. Is there
anyone you can recommend?" He said yes he knew someone, and
he introduced me to a translator [Mr A],[5]
on the following day, Sunday morning. So I met [Mr A] at the Palestine
Hotel. It may sound rather strange but the lobby at the Palestine
Hotel was the informal headquarters, capital of the whole city
if you like. It was the place where all the journalists were.
All the Iraqis who wanted to work with the journalists, they all
went there. The Americans were there.
Q191 Sir Philip Mawer:
It was a kind of exchange? Like a little market if you like?
Mr David Blair:
Exactly, yeah.
Q192 Sir Philip Mawer:
The usual trading in skills and information and so on? I understand.
Mr David Blair:
So I met [Mr A]there and I spoke to him. His spoken English was
very good. He struck me favourably as being a very easy character
to get along with. I asked him whether he had worked for any journalist
before and he had worked for CBC, the Canadian TV people, before
the war. As it happened I knew a couple of the CBC people and
I had a very high opinion of them. I thought they would only hire
someone who knew what he was doing, so I thought that was a good
reference.
Q193 Sir Philip Mawer:
What was his background, from your knowledge of him? I mean
what was
had he been full-time involved in translation
work of one sort or another in the past? Who had he worked for
apart from CBC?
Mr David Blair:
He was my age, he was thirty years old. Before the war he had
worked as a translator for a car hire company in the Al Rashid
Hotel. He had also worked as a guide for pilgrims visiting the
various holy sites in Iraq and he was studying for a translation
qualification at Mustansiriya University in Baghdad. His studies
had obviously been interrupted by the war. He hadn't qualified.
In fact he took his exams a couple of weeks ago. So all that plus
his manner and his command of spoken English led me to think that
he would be worth hiring. What I did was what I usually do in
these situations, I said to him "Right I'll use you for today
and then we'll see how it goes." And I used him on that Sunday
and I used him on the Monday and he was fine. Not only was he
quite comfortable translating interviews, he was also a very pleasant
person to get along with, which is extremely important. And he
was veryhe was quite diffident, didn't tend to take the
initiativehe would do what I asked him to do. Very calm
and that gave me a lot of confidence in him because Baghdad at
the time was a pretty frightening place. I didn't want to be with
someone who was going to be hysterical.
Q194 Sir Philip Mawer:
No, or suddenly panic if you were in a difficult situation.
Mr David Blair:
I do remember actually we got into quite a sticky spot on the
Monday or the Tuesday when we went to a hospital in Saddam City,
which is perhaps the most volatile area of Baghdad. And we arrived
at the hospital a couple of minutes after a Fedayeen attack had
taken place on the street outside. And the Fedayeen were still
being pursued and shooting was going on a little way away. And
they were carrying the corpses into the hospital in front of us.
And the crowd was obviously quite hysterical. And there was one
man whose brother had been killed. He was in hysterics and I remember
[Mr A] just turned to me very calmly and said "David, I fear
for your life . We need to leave." "Right. OK, we'll
go." So he had a cool judgment.
Q195 Sir Philip Mawer:
You came to rely on his judgment?
Mr David Blair:
Well, yes. In a difficult situation, if he told me there was
a difficult situation, then we moved. So I came to rely on his
appraisal of what the situation was like.
Q196 Sir Philip Mawer:
His sense of what was happening and the kind of vibes if you
like?
Mr David Blair:
Yes, exactly. So I had a high opinion of him and in fact on
my last trip to Baghdad I worked with him and as far as I know
he's working with the Daily Telegraph correspondent who's there
now.
Q197 Sir Philip Mawer: Right.
Now, can you say what were the circumstances in which you went
to the Iraqi foreign ministry building? What was the sequence
of events? Why go there? What prompted you to go there?
Mr David Blair:
Sure.
Q198 Sir Philip Mawer:
And then take us through the process of coming across the documents.
I mean, did you go because of your translator's suggestion or
somebody else? Did you hear from other correspondents that this
thing wasthe building was there and people were discovering
papers in it, or what?
Mr David Blair:
Perhaps I can begin answering that by talking about the time
three or four days after I arrived, on the Monday and Tuesday
of that week. As often happens in this situation, I was talking
to my colleagues, I was talking to a lot of other journalists
I knew. And journalists were talking about documents. They were
talking about finding interesting documents and I learned, I think
it was on the Tuesday, from the foreign desk that a Sunday Telegraph
correspondent had written a story based upon a document he had
found in the Mukhabarat headquarters. And the foreign desk suggested
to me that I should see if I could find any interesting documents.
No specifics were mentioned. They didn't say we want documents
on subject 'X' or anything like that.
Q199 Sir Philip Mawer: So
there was no suggestion you had to go and look for Mr Gdocuments
about Mr Galloway?
Mr David Blair:
No. Not at all, just in general terms that I should try and find
interesting documents. What the foreign desk reminded me of was
that when Kabul fell in November 2001, which was the nearest sort
of precedent we had for this kind of situation, interesting documents
did appear. Stories were written at the time. So what I did on
the Wednesday was I went to the Mukhabarat headquarters with another
British journalistKim Sengupta from The Independent. We
went in my car with [Mr A] and my driver. We went to the Mukhabarat
headquarters. It's quite a large complex of buildings. It had
been both bombed and extensively looted and had hundreds of journalists
gone through it as well. When we arrived I remember there were
a couple of camera crews there and other journalists around and
we went through some of the outbuildings. Everything had gone,
it was just stripped bare and there were lots of looters present
as well. So we stayed about an hourfound absolutely nothing
of any interest at all. So then I went off and did a couple of
other stories on the Thursday and on the Friday and the whole
question of documents receded from my mind. But then on the Saturdaythe
way we work of course is that Saturday is the one day of the week
when I'm not expected to file for the newspaper because I don't
. . .traditionally its your day off if you're in the field. But
Baghdad at that time offered few opportunities for leisure so
I had the Saturday free. And what I thought was, well, I might
as well try and try again to see if I can find some interesting
documents. And I thought the Mukhabarat headquarters was obviously
a waste of time. Where else might one go? And I thought, well,
I guess one could try the foreign ministry. The reason why that
came up particularly was because the foreign ministry was located
very close to the Al Rashid hotel where I had stayed during three
of my four pre-war visits. So I'd driven past the foreign ministry
every day during that time. I knew exactly where it was. And
there was another aspect, which was that I was genuinely curious
to know whether it was still there. There was a sense in Baghdad
at that time that, if you'd been there before, as you drove around
the city you were looking at familiar landmarks and thinking "Oh,
it's survivedit's still therewhat's happened to
it?" So I was quite curious to know whether this building
was still there. And it seemed to be the obvious choice now that
the Mukhabarat headquarters had been pillaged to the point of
destruction.
5 Identity not relevant to a conclusion on the complaint
and therefore not disclosed above. Back
|