Examination of Witness (Questions 100-119)
Dr Burhan Mahmoud Al-Chalabi
20 April 2006
Q100 Sir Philip Mawer:
Mr Al-Mukhtar, you were about to say something helpful and I am
afraid I cut you off.
Mr Al-Mukhtar:
That is fine. The structure was this. The oil company had a
contract with SOMO, that is, Fortum had a contract with SOMO for
three million. In that contract the agent was Dr Chalabi, for
which he has got his commission. Evidently, without Dr Chalabi's
knowledge, somehow Zureikat and Fortum have obtained a further
million; it is a separate shipment. Zureikat was not the agent
of Fortum, so clearly Fortum, in order for them to give the commission
to Zureikat, either they did not have the arrangement or they
did not want to do it because they hadwhatever, because
it is a state-owned company. So what they have done is, they
have asked Dr Chalabi to use his own vehicle, that is, the company
which he had, of which he was the beneficial owner, to receive
the commission which is for Zureikat and to pass it on to Zureikat,
and for that service I think he also got some added on. You had
some payment?
Dr Al-Chalabi:
I think I have had two cents or something.
Mr Al-Mukhtar:
So he hadfor facilitating this transfer, ie, the amount
coming from Fortum to the company and from the company to Zureikat,
but they are two separate exercises. Whetheraccording
to the IIS or whatever, how did this one million come about, Dr
Chalabi has no knowledge and he has not any part in it.
Q101 Sir Philip Mawer:
He has made that very clear already, Mr Al-Mukhtar, and I am grateful
to you for setting the position out as clearly as you have done.
It is consistent with the picture that I have formed from Dr
Chalabi's own contribution.
Q102 Mr Healey: May
I ask one question? When you were negotiating with Fortum and
SOMO for this transaction, you were not discussing this with Mr
Zureikat or Mr Galloway?
Dr Al-Chalabi:
I was not negotiating with SOMO. I just introduced them to the
oil company. They did all the negotiations. It was not my place
to negotiate.
Q103 Sir Philip Mawer:
But Mr Galloway and Mr Zureikat were aware of the fact that you
were in touch with Fortum?
Dr Al-Chalabi:
I do notMr Galloway had nothing to do with it.
Q104 Sir Philip Mawer:
But Mr Zureikat was aware of it?
Dr Al-Chalabi:
Mr Zureikat was aware that I was looking to introduce companies
to Iraq, certainly.
Q105 Sir Philip Mawer:
Was he aware specifically of your relationship with Fortum/Neste
Oy?
Dr Al-Chalabi:
He may have been aware that, you know, they have applied for oil.
I mean, he may have been aware. I cannot comment.
Q106 Sir Philip Mawer:
He may have been aware during that?
Dr Al-Chalabi:
Yes.
Q107 Sir Philip Mawer:
We have talked about the $70,000 dollar transfer from the Delta
Services account to Mr Zureikat and you have explained that as
a commission payment in effect by Fortum to him which you were
asked to facilitate in terms of a transfer. We have not spoken
yet about the payments that were made to Dr Abu-Zayyed, and I
think you were going to give me your account of those.
Dr Al-Chalabi:
Throughout the nineties reports were consistently coming from
Iraq through NGOs or the United Nations of the increased rate
of fatalities of the Iraqi children, of the deformities of the
Iraqi newborns, the genetic disorders in the children which were
in the areas where depleted uranium was used by the British and
American forces. Some horrific pictures were coming out. A lot
of people were talking about what is happening to the Iraqi people
but nobody was doing anything. *** I felt that the moral conscience
of the international community had gone into hibernation. Nobody
wanted to do anything about the Iraqis, and of course to everybody
Iraq was Saddam Hussein, which is not the case. The only person,
I was aware, that was trying to do something about it was Dr Amineh.
Her work struck a chord with my own conscience. She was trying
to basically create a database in the areas where Iraqi children
had been born with deformities and genetic disorders. She was
trying to get experts in order to help analyse the data. She
was trying to obviously focus attention on what was happening.
She was the only person who was doing something about it, and
I was aware that the World Health Organisation refused to undertake
such a project, you know, to find out was the depleted uranium
causing genetic disorders or not. The Atomic Energy refused to
do it, and the position in here [indicating folder], as
you know, our Secretary of State for Defence, George Robertson,
says that the British Armed Forces have been provided with protective
gear against depleted uranium effects. The Minister of the Armed
Forces, Doug Henderson, says the health care of the Iraqi nationals
is the responsibility of the Iraqi Government, including testing
for any presence of depleted uranium. Now, the dilemma was the
Iraqi Government could not import that test equipment, so I wanted
to help this lady's work. That was a conscious decision, a charitable
decision and a humanitarian decision. That was the only reason,
I have to say, nothing else.
Q108 Sir Philip Mawer:
How did you first come to know of her?
Dr Al-Chalabi:
The work she was doing was common knowledge among the community,
and I attend lectures and read, but the work was well known among
the Iraqi people.
Q109 Sir Philip Mawer:
Did you meet her personally?
Dr Al-Chalabi:
I have never met the lady.
Q110 Sir Philip Mawer:
The contributions you made totalling $120,000 were intended then,
you are saying,
?
Dr Al-Chalabi:
To help her with her research, to help the Iraqi people.
Q111 Mr Al-Mukhtar:
Perhaps you would like to refer to the flight cost.
Dr Al-Chalabi:
The flight cost was something like, I said, $450,000. Now, I
want to add something. In February, somewhere in the middle of
February, His Highness Sheikh Mohammed al-Maktoum of Dubai approached
the offices, I think, of the Mariam appeal and he said he will
donate an Emirates flight free of charge. Therefore, it is only
then that the funds were available for me to help, and this is
how the money was raised for the flight. Now I decided to make
a donation for this lady.
Mr Al-Mukhtar:
So the money was raised for the flight. The flight was cancelled.
Before it was cancelled there was a donation for the flight,
so there was this excess money, and then subsequently the flight
was cancelled, so there was this money which was then donated
to the
Q112 Sir Philip Mawer:
I am still not absolutely clear about this. I would appreciate
your help in getting it clear. What I understand you to be saying
is thatwhere did the money come from, as it were, which
you have described as being available for the flight?
Dr Al-Chalabi:
The commission money. There were two sets of money: the money
which came from the selling of the vouchers, which eventually
Q113 Sir Philip Mawer:
Yes, I understood, and that was the £1,000 that you mentioned,
was part of the voucher arrangement?
Dr Al-Chalabi:
The voucher arrangement, and the commission money.
Q114 Sir Philip Mawer:
The commission money was the $470,000?
Dr Al-Chalabi:
Mmmwell, take the Zureikat money out because I was not
a party to that.
Q115 Sir Philip Mawer:
Understood, okay, $400,000 then, say.
Dr Al-Chalabi:
The initialyes, excluding the deal, the oil deal, between
Zureikat and Fortum.
Q116 Sir Philip Mawer:
Understood, so if the total payments of commission were, as I
understand them, to have been $472,000 in round terms
.
Dr Al-Chalabi:
Yes.
Q117 Sir Philip Mawer:
.and
the 70,000 was the amount transferred to Mr Zureikat, that leaves
about $400,000.
Dr Al-Chalabi:
Correct.
Q118 Sir Philip Mawer:
And you are sayingare you saying? I believe you to be
sayingthat
that money was intended to cover the cost of the flight.
Dr Al-Chalabi:
Initially, yes.
Q119 Sir Philip Mawer:
But subsequently
Dr Al-Chalabi:
In February.
|