| Figure 2: Our sources of evidence in carrying out this examination
|
| Method | Purpose
|
| Survey of Electoral Registration Officers (120 replies received to over 400 surveys sent out).
| To provide comparable qualitative and quantitative data on registration across the country. There is considerable scope for variation in how Electoral Registration Officers perform their duties due to different local demands and constraints.
|
| Visits to six Local Authorities | To gain an understanding of issues around registration and from senior officers to gain an understanding of how registration fits into other duties and services through interviews with Electoral Services and other staff, including Senior Officers, and the Chief Executive
.
|
| Stakeholder Analysis and interviews as appropriate.
| To reflect the wide interest in electoral registration. Among those interviewed were the Department for Constitutional Affairs; the Ministry of Defence; the Foreign and Commonwealth Office; Homelesslink; the Association of Electoral Administrators.
|
| Visit to Northern Ireland | To consider the impact on registration and any lessons that could be applied to the rest of the United Kingdom. The Electoral Office of Northern Ireland (EONI) have overseen a number of changes to registration, including a move to individual registration; the introduction of personal identifiers and most recently a move away from annual canvassing.
|
| Review of existing literature | To gain an understanding of the registration framework and the current position to be able to benchmark it against best practice.
|