Memorandum 3
Submission from the National Maritime
Museum, the Queen's House and the Royal Observatory, Greenwich,
by Roy Clare, Director
The museum's mission is: to illustrate for everyone
the importance of the sea, ships, time and the stars and their
relationship with people.
1. EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
1. Science centres, especially those which
focus on astronomy and can answer questions about the nature of
the universe and the origins of life, have an important role to
play in stimulating the interest of people who have had little
formal science education.
2. Science centres provide opportunities
for involving the scientific community in public engagement activity.
3. Having inspiring displays and focusing
on what scientists actually do can help to attract young people
to careers in science and technology.
4. There is a strong demand from schools
for programmes which explain scientific ideas and their importance
in the modern world.
5. In a museum context part of the regular
funding from DCMS can be used to support science centres.
6. Capital expenditure in setting up the
astronomy centre at Greenwich was supported by public bodies,
including the Heritage Lottery Fund, DCMS and the Science and
Technology Facilities Council, along with charitable trusts and
private individuals. About 60% of the funding came from statutory
and government sources and about 20% from individuals. See Appendix
1 for details.
7. Running costs are being met from regular
museum funds, but any increase in the range or number of programmes
will require additional financial support.
8. Regular maintenance and updating of the
displays is essential and costly.
2. THE ROLE
OF SCIENCE
CENTRES
1. The purpose of audience development in
relation to Astronomy Centre at Greenwich is to increase the number
and range of key audiences in keeping with the overall NMM stated
objective of maximizing access and inspiration for users, most
notably by:
(a) Increasing the number of school-age children
visiting the Museum.
(b) Widening participation across socio-economic
and culturally diverse groups.
(c) Providing accessible interpretation and
improving the quality of the experience for all audiences.
(d) Extending access through lifelong learning,
e-learning resources and outreach.
2. Science centres provide public and school
visitors with valuable access to scientists involved in active
research, furthering the need to improve public engagement with
the science sector. Given the changes in the secondary curriculum,
particularly those coming into play in 2008, this is essential
for the delivery of the new programmes of study.
3. Opportunities for out-of-school activities
provide teachers and pupils with access to knowledge and resources
they would not ordinarily have access to. Science centres provide
valuable opportunities to engage students and maintain their interest
in science.
4. Many science teachers in schools, especially
primary schools, are not specialists and they find access to up-to-date
information very helpful.
5. Astronomy programmes in the new planetarium
help to bring alive the subjects of astronomy and astro-physics,
with both recreations of the night sky and photographs from the
latest space missions. City-dwellers cannot see any but the brightest
stars and planetarium shows demonstrate the wonder of the night
sky which can be seen away from areas dominated by street lighting.
6. A historic site such as that at Greenwich,
where pioneering astronomy was practised for nearly three centuries,
is especially helpful in getting across the incremental nature
of sciencethat today's achievements depend on a long history
of scientific inquiry and practice.
7. The sense of perspective provided by
having a modern science centre on an historic site, with original
instruments still in place, also appeals to adult audiences in
a way which some conventional science centres may find harder
to achieve.
8. The newly-opened displays at Greenwich
were informed by extensive market research with both current and
potential audiences. The results showed that science centres,
especially if they have good hands-on displays and access to qualified
staff who can answer questions, are attractive to both family
audiences and school groups.
9. Attractive science centres are seen as
a good way of interesting children and young people in science
subjects and the potential they offer for interesting careers.
3. FUNDING FROM
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
1. The astronomy centre at Greenwich received
£1.3 million government funding for capital expenditure from
Department for Culture, Media and Sport, to repair and refurbish
the Grade II* listed Victorian South Building.
2. Running costs from maintenance and staff
are being met from the regular funding from DCMS for the National
Maritime Museum.
4. FUNDING FROM
OTHER BODIES
1. The remaining capital expenditure came
from:
(i) Heritage Lottery Fund (£6.78 million).
(ii) Millennium Commission.
(iii) The Science and Technology Facilities
Council (through the then Particle Physics and Astronomy Research
Council).
(b) Trusts and FoundationsFurther
details are given in Appendix 1, but the principal contributions
came from:
(i) Basil Samuel Charitable Trust.
(ii) Garfield Weston Foundation.
(iii) Sir John Fisher Foundation.
(ii) Lloyd's Register Educational Trust.
(iii) National Physical Laboratory.
(d) Individual DonorsFurther details
are given in Appendix 1, but the principal contributions came
from:
(i) Peter Harrison Foundation.
(ii) Weller Settlement Fund.
(i) Many donations came from visitors and
other members of the public who contributed to the Museum's Universal
Appeal, launched in May 2004 and chaired by Peter Snow.
(f) Further details of the principal funders
are given in Appendix 1. There were also some contributions in
kind from manufacturers and suppliers.
5. FUTURE LONG-TERM
SUPPORT
1. Additional funding will need to be found
for future updating of the displays, interactive exhibits, planetarium
shows and the replacement of equipment which becomes worn out.
In the absence of central government funding the Museum will need
to approach potential sponsors, as it did for the initial funding.
However, it may prove more difficult to raise money for renewal,
since a completely new facility is generally more attractive to
sponsors.
2. Raising funds from sponsors requires
a staff team dedicated to this purpose, which in itself incurs
costs. Such costs are easier for large institutions to bear.
3. Any expansion of the Educational programmes
above present levels will require additional staff. This is an
area where central government could play a major role, as trusts
and corporations are generally more interested in providing new
facilities than in meeting ongoing running costs.
June 2007
|