United Kingdom Parliament
Publications & records
Advanced search
 HansardArchivesResearchHOC PublicationsHOL PublicationsCommittees
Select Committee on Science and Technology Written Evidence


Supplementary evidence from Dr Tony Holder, representative of NIMR staff, following the evidence session on 13 December 2006

  In response to Q97, I offered to provide further information on the "Mill Hill Step Change Option" that was prepared by Institute management in 2004. The £35 million would provide refurbishment and new construction works consisting of accelerated refurbishment of the buildings, new facilities for imaging, emerging infections and medicinal chemistry and a new outreach and conference centre. The revision of this document with current cost estimates is in progress and I will forward it to you when it is available.

  I would also like to comment on the evidence provided by Professor Blakemore in the second panel of the session, to provide some clarification to the Committee:

    Q110

    In response to this question it was stated that "NIMR is the last of the MRC's institutes or units which is not co-located with [a] university".

    In fact the MRC facilities at Harwell are also not co-located with any university.

    Q116

    It was stated that "The process has involved the formal investment strategy, the Task Force and the whole of the Council of the MRC working over three or four years maintaining a consistent and unanimous view. The most unanimous feature being that the Mill Hill site is simply inappropriate in the long run to deliver the vision of the science".

    The mission of the Task Force was to examine the future of NIMR and its location. The Task Force should have had no preconceived view on the location and it did not make the stated conclusion.

    Q148

    In response to Mr Afriyie regarding limiting the budgeting to two years it was stated "... this is a misconception generated within the institute."

  In fact this "misconception" arose from a statement in a letter dated 24 February 2006, from the MRC CEO to the then director and seen by senior staff: "... Council made no decisions about the budget allocation from April 2008, which will be decided in the context of the next Director's plans". The misconception was further reinforced verbally by the MRC CEO at a meeting at Mill Hill with senior staff in October 2006.

January 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 22 March 2007