2 Managing Public Sector Businesses
for Value
10. Controlling shareholders use a number of "shareholder
levers" to ensure that their businesses will deliver agreed
objectives. These levers include setting clear business objectives,
approving management remuneration, monitoring performance and
holding management to account for performance. One of the improvements
brought about by the Executive is that these levers are applied
in a more timely manner, whereas in the past public sector businesses
were allowed to make poor investment decisions without sufficient
critical challenge, or to record several years' poor performance
without consequences.[28]
11. The Executive has the ability to replace management,
particularly when it is failing to deliver business objectives,
and also has a role in approving management remuneration, on which
it can take external advice to ensure that the correct reward
structures are in place.[29]
These levers mean that management can be rewarded for good, and
removed for poor, performance. The Executive has also strengthened
the role of non-Executive Directors, particularly for the Trading
Funds. Non-Executive Directors bring a range of skills to the
Boards of these businesses, provide greater management challenge
and warn the Executive when there are problems. The Executive
currently provides details of management changes it has initiated
in its annual report. [30]
12. A crucial lever not available to the Executive,
but one which is available to equivalent bodies in the private
sector, is the ability to arrange for the provision of finance
to businesses where there is a robust case for investment.[31]
Having this ability provides shareholders with additional influence
on management and overall business strategy. Under the current
system, however, such financing comes from departments or the
National Loans Fund[32]
and is counted against Departmental Expenditure Limits; senior
officials must weigh up the need for investment in businesses
against other public spending priorities. Public spending priorities
will sometimes take precedence over public sector business investment,
with a resulting lack of finance for businesses when needed, which
is aggravated by their lack of direct access to capital markets.[33]
13. The Executive has negotiated a variety of relationships
with government departments for working with businesses (Figure
1), which offer a pragmatic solution when a department is
unwilling to delegate full responsibility to an external body
for shareholder issues. Under the joint working arrangement with,
for example, the Ministry of Defence (MoD), staff at the Executive
work closely with the MoD's Directorate of Business Delivery and
have a seat on the Ministerial ownership council.
14. Whilst the Executive has improved the government's
approach to managing shareholdings, the good performance of some
of its businesses in recent years (Figure 3) could be ascribed
partly to favourable market conditions. The Executive's own internal
measures point to an increase in the number of businesses with
balance sheet risks, and to have strategies in place that will
enhance shareholder value.[34]
Eleven of the businesses in its portfolio made losses at some
point in the last three years (Figure 4), and a number
of its largest businesses face strategic challenges in the near
future.[35] Problems
often arise because businesses are not adequately compensated
for delivering policy objectives or do not have access to investment,
or because the shareholder levers are not used in a timely manner.
Figure 3: Total Operating Profits of the Executive's businesses 2000-2006
Figure 4: Loss Making Businesses 2003 -2006
| £m Operating profit / (loss)
| 2003/4
| 2004/5
| 2005/6
|
| ABRO |
13.4 | (4.0)
| 6.2 |
| BNFL |
(351.0) | (203.0)
| 65.0 |
| British Waterways
| (3.8) | (7.4)
| 0.4 |
| DARA |
10.2 | 9.3
| (3.2) |
| Fire Service College
| (1.5) | (0.2)
| (1.7) |
| Met Office
| (9.2) | 9.5
| 13.4 |
| Northern Ireland Water Service
| (179.0) | (209.5)
| (236.6) |
| PartnershipsUK
| 1.9 | (0.4)
| 1.5 |
| Royal Mint
| 2.1 | (2.0)
| (0) |
| UK Atomic Energy Authority
| 0.8 | (1.8)
| 0.4 |
| Working Links
| 6.4 | (1.4)
| 3.6 |
Notes:
1. As stated in the Shareholder Executive Annual Report 2005-06
(Annex A), the Shareholder Executive only advises on specific
issues in relation to the Fire Service College and Northern Ireland
Water Service. It does not therefore analyse the performance
of these businesses in the Annual Report.
2. The figures for Northern Ireland Water Service show the net
deficit on operations. This excludes the funding provided through
money voted by Parliament, which accounts for the bulk of the
agency's income, and will continue to do so until the introduction
of charging in the context of the water reform programme.
Source: Shareholder Executive
28 C&AG's Report, Figure 3, paras 1.15, 2.8 Back
29
Q 49-50 Back
30
Qq 13, 16, 23; C&AG's Report, para 2.7 Back
31
Q 8; C&AG's Report, para 2.24 Back
32
C&AG's Report, para 2.25 Back
33
Q 114 Back
34
C&AG's Report, Appendix 5, Figure 21 Back
35
Q 20; C&AG's Report, para 3.2-3.3 Back
|