Evidence submitted by Kath Woolley, Bury
Primary Care Trust (AUDIO 7)
My points are as follows:
Whether accurate data on waiting times for audiology
services are available?
1. With the Modernising Hearing Aid Services
(MHAS) programme and the provision of hardware and software, the
data collection for activity has never been more comprehensive.
Why audiology services appear to lag behind other
specialties in respect of waiting times and access and how this
can be addressed?
2. The Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity
template, introduced in January 2006, for collection of pure tone
audiometry was non-sensical with unhelpful guidance notes. This
led to inaccuracies in figures between Trusts with variations
in interpretation. However, the template has now been updated
successfully and it is now comprehensible, sensible and meaningful.
3. It would be helpful if Siemans could
produce software that would enable the effective collation of
the required bracketed waiting times ie 1-2 weeks, 2-3 weeks etc
as this is not easily calculated by hand and is time consuming.
The system currently counts patients waiting 0-13 weeks/13-26
weeks and 26 plus weeks.
4. The waiting times in Bury at the end
of December 2006 were less than 11 weeks for all diagnostic tests
and hearing aid work.
Whether enough new audiologists are being trained?
5. The NHS is supporting the students undertaking
the four year BSc(Hons) in Audiology. We continually have two
students on six-month placement and this week have had an additional
student on a two-week placement. These commitments, in a small
department, affect our output as the students, observe, practice
under supervision and are assessed for their competencies. This
investment towards the future workforce should be recognised.
Kath Woolley
Service Director, Audiology, Bury PCT
22 January 2007
|