United Kingdom Parliament
Publications & records
Advanced search
 HansardArchivesResearchHOC PublicationsHOL PublicationsCommittees
Select Committee on Defence Twelfth Report


Report


Our scrutiny of the Main Estimates

1. The Main Supply Estimates 2007-08—by which the Government requests resources from Parliament to meet its expenditure plans for the financial year ahead—were laid before the House on 30 April 2007.[1] The House of Commons will be asked to agree them on 9 July.

2. The Main Estimates contain a resource-based Estimate for each department and, separately, for public service pension schemes. This Committee's interest has focused on the Ministry of Defence (MoD) Estimate[2], though we have also examined the Estimate for Armed Forces retired pay, pensions etc, which covers both the Armed Forces Pension Scheme and the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme.[3]

3. The MoD provided the Committee, on publication of the Main Estimates, with a memorandum on each of these two Estimates. These are printed as Appendix 1 to this report.[4] We asked the MoD to answer some additional questions arising from the Estimates and the Department's Estimates memoranda. The MoD's response is printed as Appendix 2 to this report.[5]

4. We commend the MoD for improving the format of its Estimates memoranda, and for engaging positively with the Committee over its presentation of financial information. Its response to our additional questions is helpful and thorough.

5. The purpose of this report is to publish the evidence received from the MoD on the Main Estimates, to highlight some of the issues raised, and to reiterate our concerns about the omission from the Main Estimates of any estimates of the costs of military operations.

Ministry of Defence Requests for Resources

6. The MoD's Main Estimate requests resources of £33.7 billion, with a net cash requirement of £31.7 billion. The MoD's Estimate is split between three Requests for Resources (RfR):

The headline figures are set out in table 1.

Table 1: The Ministry of Defence's Requests for Resources
£'000
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06
Provision Final Provision Forecast Outturn Outturn
RfR1: Provision of defence capability 32,608,19732,349,202 32,311,90632,780,865
RfR2: Conflict prevention 44,3031,427,526 1,382,7911,015,634
RfR3: War Pensions and Allowances, etc 1,027,0071,047,661 1,039,9501,068,595
Net resource requirement 33,679,50734,824,389 34,734,647 34,865,094
Net cash requirement 31,677,30833,746,052 31,755,167 30,687,372

Source: HM Treasury: Main Supply Estimates 2007-08 [6]

Provision of defence capability

7. By far the largest part of the resources requested falls within RfR1, which covers the personnel, equipment and support costs for the Armed Forces. It includes, for example, the nuclear warhead programme.[7]

8. The Estimate breaks down RFR1 by Top-Level Budget (TLB).[8] This year's breakdown reflects some recent organisational changes within the MoD. The changes are reducing the number of TLBs, some of which now command a significant share of the Defence Vote. The changes are:

  • In 2006-07, Commander-in-Chief Fleet and Second Sea Lord/Commander in Chief Naval Home Command were merged into a single TLB called Commander-in-Chief Fleet (or Fleet). The 2007-08 resource provision for Fleet is £2.1 billion.
  • On 2 April 2007, the Defence Procurement Agency and the Defence Logistics Organisation were merged to form the Defence Equipment and Support (DE&S) TLB. The 2007-08 resource provision for DE&S is £15.7 billion—some 48% of the total RfR1 resource provision.
  • From 2 April 2007, General Officer Commanding (Northern Ireland) and elements of the Adjutant General's TLB have been incorporated into the Commander-in-Chief Land Command TLB. The 2007-08 resource provision for Land Command is £5.8 billion.
  • Since 2006-07, fixed assets have been accounted for in a centralised manner under the Defence Estates and DE&S TLBs, rather than by the TLBs which hold and use them.[9]

9. Next year's Estimates are expected to reflect further changes:

  • The merger between the RAF's Personnel and Training Command and Strike Command to form Air Command from 2 April 2007. The combined 2007-08 resource provision for these two TLBs is £2.5 billion.
  • The incorporation of the remainder of the Adjutant General's TLB within one Land Forces TLB. The combined 2007-08 resource provision for these two TLBs is £6.5 billion.[10]

Conflict prevention

10. The Estimate states that RfR2 covers "conflict prevention, early warning, crisis management, conflict resolution, peacemaking, peacekeeping and peacebuilding activity and … associated strengthening of international and regional systems and capacity; and other associated non-cash items".[11] It is under RfR2 that the costs of military operations fall, though provision for this is not made in the Main Estimates (an issue to which we return in paragraph 16 below). In our report on the Spring Supplementary Estimates, we expressed our concern that use of the term "conflict prevention" was misleading, as it appeared to cover military operations of all kinds, from war-fighting to peacekeeping operations.[12] The Government's response stated that "conflict prevention" was a generic term used to describe RfR2, but that it noted our comments and was currently reviewing the layout of the Estimate with a view to providing greater clarity in future Estimates.[13] We welcome the MoD's intention to provide greater clarity in the Estimates. The headings used should be readily understandable, and it should be clear where the costs of military operations—which cannot fairly be described as conflict prevention—are accounted for.

11. The Main Estimate includes provision for conflict prevention of £44 million for the MoD, of which £29 million is shown to be for Sub-Saharan Africa and £15 million for the rest of the world.[14] We asked the MoD why conflict prevention operations were divided in this way, between Sub-Saharan Africa and the rest of the world. Its response states that the figures relate to the MoD's contribution to the African Conflict Prevention Pool (ACPP) and the Global Conflict Prevention Pool (GCPP), respectively, and that the ACPP was maintained as a separate fund in order to reflect the high priority which the Government placed on African development and security issues.[15]

12. The MoD's memorandum explains that programmes of conflict prevention activity are determined by officials in MoD, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and the Department for International Development (DfID), and the costs of activity are apportioned to whichever Department is best placed to oversee project delivery from a financial perspective[16] Some defence projects are funded through the FCO, as they may be best placed to manage activities through their Embassy in the country concerned. Table 2 sets out the 2007-08 provision for conflict prevention for the MoD, FCO and DfID as requested in the Main Supply Estimates.

Table 2: 2007-08 provision for conflict prevention for the MoD, FCO and DfID
£'000
MoD FCODfID
Programme expenditure: Sub-Saharan Africa 29,0634,510 23,578
Programme expenditure: Rest of World 15,24050,240 8,520
Peacekeeping: Sub-Saharan Africa 100,141
Peacekeeping: Rest of World 101,269
Post-conflict reconstruction 6,000

Source: HM Treasury: Main Supply Estimates 2007-08 [17]

13. In 2006-07, the GCPP supported activities in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Balkans, Caribbean, Latin America, Sri Lanka, India and Pakistan, Indonesia, East Timor, the Middle East and North Africa, Nepal, and Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Military activity funded under the ACPP in 2006-07 included:

  • Pre-deployment training of around 7,000 African peacekeepers from Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Ghana and Gambia, for African Union or United Nations peacekeeping missions in Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Burundi.
  • Funding and supply of instructors to support the International Mine Action Training Centre.
  • A training programme for the Republic of Sierra Leone Armed Forces.
  • Funding and instructor support for the Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre in Ghana, training African military and police officers.[18]

14. The MoD's memorandum provides a breakdown of the provision requested in the Main Estimates for conflict prevention in 2007-08, by country and by activity.

Table 3: Africa Conflict Prevention Pool Strategy for 2007-08
Country/Region Activity Allocation (£)
Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Support to the development of the ECOWAS Standby Force (sub-element of the ASF) 957,000
West AfricaBritish Military Advisory and Training Team West Africa— support to regional PSO capability 2,096,260
West AfricaSupport to Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre 1,180,000
GhanaPSO capacity building 696,000
SenegalPSO capacity building and SSR 298,000
GambiaPSO capacity building and SSR 284,000
NigeriaPSO capacity building and SSR 1,642,000
Sierra LeoneSSR programme for the Republic of Sierra Leone Armed Forces and Defence Ministry conducted by UK-led International Military Advisory and Training Team (IMATT) 13,484,195
LiberiaSupport to SSR activity 175,000
South AfricaBritish Peace Support Team South Africa—support to PSO and SSR work 1,346,000
AngolaPSO capacity building 197,500
MozambiquePSO capacity building and SSR 206,200
BotswanaPSO capacity building and SSR 106,000
MalawiPSO capacity building 346,000
ZambiaPSO capacity building and SSR 109,000
East AfricaBritish Peace Support Training Team East Africa - support to regional PSO capability 2,412,000
KenyaSupport to International Mine Action Training Centre 987,000
KenyaPSO capacity building and SSR 359,000
TanzaniaPSO capacity building and SSR 322,000
SudanSupport to Comprehensive Peace Agreement security implementation and Joint Integrated Forces 371,600
EthiopiaProgramme subject to confirmation 350,145
UgandaPSO capacity building and SSR 437,000
DRCPSO capacity building and SSR 163,100
RwandaPSO capacity building and SSR 538,000
Total 29,063,000

Source: Ministry of Defence [19]

Table 4: Global Conflict Prevention Pool Strategy for 2007-08
Strategy Allocation (£)
Afghanistan/Iraq1,667,000
Balkans1,283,000
Caribbean155,000
India-Pakistan71,000
Indonesia/East Timor 289,000
Latin America (including Belize/Guatemala) 30,000
Middle East & North Africa 231,000
Nepal322,000
Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States 3,347,000
Security Sector Reform 3,287,000
Small Arms/Light Weapons 500,000
Sri Lanka490,000
UN3,568,000
Total15,240,000

Source: Ministry of Defence [20]

15. It is interesting to note from tables 3 and 4 above that 46% of the MoD's contribution to the Africa Conflict Prevention Pool this year is directed to security sector reform in Sierra Leone, and that 22% of its contribution to the Global Conflict Prevention Pool is to go to Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States.

Cost of military operations

16. There is no provision in the Main Estimates for the costs of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, nor for peacekeeping in the Balkans. Provision for these will be included in the Supplementary Estimates process, as in previous years.[21] In 2006-07, the MoD brought forward the presentation of estimates on the costs of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan to the Winter Supplementary Estimates, rather than waiting for the Spring Supplementary Estimates as in the past. We trust that this will continue.

17. In previous reports we have repeatedly recommended that the MoD include provision for operations in the Main Estimates, rather than leaving them to the Supplementary Estimates.[22] In our report on the Spring Supplementary Estimate 2006-07, we concluded:

    While we accept that it is difficult for the MoD to provide accurate estimates of the costs of operations at the beginning of the financial year, we cannot see how this can be a sufficient reason for making no forecast at all. We recommend that the MoD reflect the forecast costs of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in its Main Estimates for 2007-08. The MoD could usefully include in its Estimates Memorandum (which we would intend to publish) an account of its planning assumptions for the costs of these operations.[23]

The Government response merely restated its position:

    Requests for resources for [operations] have normally been made in the Supplementary Estimates because costs are difficult to forecast in fast moving operational circumstance: Supplementary Estimates are the first occasion when the Department can reach a reasonably firm conclusion on likely costs.[24]

There was no response to our suggestion that the MoD might usefully include in its Estimates Memorandum for the Main Estimates an account of its planning assumptions for the costs of these operations. The Estimates memorandum contains no such account, and merely restates that Requests for Resources to cover the costs arising from operations will be made "in Supplementary Estimates, as they offer the first opportunity to present robust costs against a backdrop of fast moving operations".[25]

18. We remain of the view—set out in previous reports—that the MoD should include estimated costs of military operations in its Main Estimates, rather than waiting for the Supplementary Estimates. We acknowledge that these estimates would be subject to change, but point out that the Estimates process is designed to allow for changes in forecast expenditure over the year. Military operations are not unique in being subject to uncertainty and fast-moving circumstances. Under the present practice, the MoD is incurring costs in the current financial year on military operations, without parliamentary approval and without even providing Parliament with an outline indication of the costs likely to be incurred. This is entirely unacceptable and we cannot understand why the MoD fails to see this. We recommend that—at least—the MoD provide in its estimates memorandum for the Main Estimates an account of its planning assumptions for the costs of military operations in the financial year ahead. We expect a considered response to this recommendation in the Government's response to this report.

19. Because the Main Estimates contain no provision for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, they greatly underestimate the total expected cost of the MoD's conflict prevention activities. In 2006-07, provision for operations in 2006-07 was £1,002 million for Iraq and £770 million for Afghanistan.[26] The outturn has not yet been published, and—judged by previous years—may be somewhat less. While the costs of operations in Iraq may be expected to decrease in 2007-08, with the drawdown of UK Forces in that theatre, it is reasonable to assume that the cost of operations in Afghanistan will be at least of the same order.

20. Provision for the cost of peacekeeping operations in the Balkans has—to date—been requested by the FCO in the Main Estimates, and transferred to MoD at the Spring Supplementary Estimates. We have repeatedly recommended that provision for operations in the Balkans be set out in the MoD's Main Estimates instead.[27] In response to our report on the Winter Supplementary Estimate 2006-07, the Government stated that it would reconsider this recommendation in the preparation of Main Estimates for 2007-08.[28] Clearly it decided against. The FCO's Main Estimate contains provision for £100 million for peacekeeping in Sub-Saharan Africa and £101 million for global peacekeeping. The MoD's memorandum confirms that the cost of Balkans operations is contained in the FCO's global peacekeeping provision, and will be transferred to the MoD by Supplementary Estimate. It states that the current estimate is that Balkans operations will cost £22.5 million in 2007-08.[29] This is significantly less than the £53 million requested in 2006-07, in line with the announced withdrawal of most of the UK Forces in the Balkans.[30] It is disappointing that the Government has not accepted our recommendation that provision for operations in the Balkans be set out in the MoD's Main Estimate, instead of in the FCO's Estimate. We note that the Government current estimate of the cost of operations in the Balkans in 2007-08 is £22.5 million.

Conclusion

21. We recommend that the House of Commons approve the MoD's Main Estimate, and have identified no issues which require a debate before it does so. But the House should be aware that, because of the omission of the costs of military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Main Estimates greatly underestimate the total expected cost of the MoD's activities in 2007-08.


1   Central Government Supply Estimates 2007-08, Main Supply Estimates, 30 April 2007, HC 438 Back

2   HC (2006-07) 438, pp 313-335 Back

3   Ibid., pp 337-347 Back

4   See Ev 1 Back

5   See Ev 8 Back

6   HC (2006-07) 438, p 15 and p 316 Back

7   A full description of what costs fall under each of the RfRs is given in the Main Estimates, HC (2006-07) 438, p 315 Back

8   HC (2006-07) 438, pp 317-319 Back

9   Ev 1 and Ev 2, para 7 and HC (2006-07) 438, p 313, paras 2-3 and p 317 Back

10   Ev 2, para 7 and HC (2006-07) 438, p 317 Back

11   HC (2006-07) 438, p 315 Back

12   Defence Committee, Tenth Report of Session 2006-07, Cost of military operations: Spring Supplementary Estimate 2006-07, HC 379, para 3 Back

13   Defence Committee, Twelfth Special Report of Session 2006-07, Cost of military operations: Spring Supplementary Estimate 2006-07: Government Response to the Committee's Tenth Report of Session 2006-07, HC 558, Appendix, response to recommendation 1 Back

14   HC (2006-07) 438, p 319; Ev 3, para 10 Back

15   Ev 9, answer 4 Back

16   Ibid. Back

17   HC (2006-07) 438, p 319, pp 351-352, and p 368 Back

18   Ev 9, answer 4 Back

19   Ev 10, answer 4 Back

20   Ibid. Back

21   Ev 3 and Ev 4, para 4 Back

22   For example, Defence Committee, Fourth Report of Session 2005-06, Costs of peacekeeping in Iraq and Afghanistan: Spring Supplementary Estimate 2005-06, HC 980, para 15; Ninth Report of Session 2005-06, Ministry of Defence Main Estimates 2006-07, HC 1366, para 9 Back

23   HC (2006-07) 379, para 4 Back

24   HC (2006-07) 558, Appendix, response to recommendations 2 and 3 Back

25   Ev 3, para 11 Back

26   HC (2006-07) 379, paras 6 and 12 Back

27   For example, HC (2005-06) 980, para 17; HC (2005-06) 1366, para 12 Back

28   Defence Committee, Fourth Special Report of Session 2006-07, Costs of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan: Winter Supplementary Estimate 2006-07: Government Response to the Committee's Third Report of Session 2006-07, HC 317, para 4 Back

29   Ev 11, answer 5 Back

30   See HC (2006-07) 379, paras 5 and 16-17 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 10 July 2007