APPENDIX 5
Memorandum submitted by West Coast Rail
250 Campaign
BACKGROUND TO
WCR 250
Since 1992 West Coast Rail 250 has campaigned
for the upgrading of the West Coast Main Line, the key rail route
in Great Britain, linking London with four of the largest city
regions of the United Kingdom. Through the work of the campaign,
supported by almost all of the principal local authorities within
the area served by the West Coast network, and of the supporting
work by MPs and peers in the All-Party Group, we have brought
our influence to bear on major investment decisions taken over
the last 10 years. As a result we have now achieved the improvement
of much of the route to carry faster and more frequent trains.
As the current project continues towards completion
over the next few years, it is essential now to commence planning
for regular investment in the maintenance of the line so as to
offer a service to its customers, both passengers and freight,
which is appropriate to the 21st century.
TIMING OF
THE SELECT
COMMITTEE INQUIRY
We recognise that franchising arrangements are
of concern to the Select Committee but we feel that the timing
of this inquiry is overdue bearing in mind that new franchises
have been awarded over the last year and consultations are well
underway in respect of the new Cross-country, East and West Midlands
franchises. As a result the West Coast 250 Campaign is only able
to comment on a few broad points of principle. Our priority must
be to respond to the current franchise consultations, which are
of enormous importance to our members.
PROCESS FOR
AWARDING FRANCHISES
We welcome the initial preparatory work undertaken
by officials in the DfT Rail Division and the contacts they have
made at regional level. This process can only be really productive
if DfT officials are able to be forthcoming and honest in their
dealings with local authorities, PTEs and other relevant bodies.
We would urge Ministers to encourage their officials to be more
transparent in future consultations. West Coast 250 believes that
there are real benefits to be obtained by the DfT from tapping
in to local knowledge and to the considerable knowledge that goes
into the formulation of LTPs.
OBJECTIVES OF
PASSENGER RAIL
FRANCHISING
WCR 250 was instrumental during 1994-95 in persuading
the then Government and OPRAF to use the initial West Coast franchise
as a good opportunity to invite bids for upgraded services and
new rolling stock. As a result the new Pendolino tilting trains,
along with a comprehensive and lengthy maintenance contract, are
a key factor in attracting new customers as the substantial infrastructure
investment on the West Coast Main Line delivers high levels of
reliability.
WCR 250 is also campaigning to secure major
new investment in the fabric of our stations along with car parking
and ancillary facilities. These hardly featured in the original
franchises, which is why we would urge that all new franchises
must place a greater emphasis on improving stations and car parks.
The DfT therefore should use the franchising
process to clearly set out in detail what minimum service levels
it feels are appropriate for routes, stations and rolling stock.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
Given the recent increases in fuel prices we
would urge the Select Committee to investigate whether passenger
services, such as Cross Country which operates entirely "under
the wires", should be required to operate by electric traction.
ACCOMMODATING GROWTH
We believe that it is crucial future franchises
must be able to respond to demographic and economic changes. We
know that, for example, the Milton Keynes area is designated for
considerable growth in population and that significant economic
growth is forecast for the West Midlands and North West of England
metropolitan areas. Therefore it will be essential that the railways
are able to play their part in providing environmentally sustainable
transport and are able in particular to meet significant future
increases in demand. Future franchises must facilitate such expansion
in rail travel and must not in any way be an obstacle to modal
shift and new investment.
19 June 2006
|