Memorandum submitted by The Foyer Federation
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Foyer Federation is the UK's leading youth
organisation providing the largest network of accommodation integrated
with education and training opportunities for 16-25 year-olds
in housing need.
We welcome the opportunity to respond to this
inquiry, which sets out the Foyer Federation's response to a number
of proposals within Every Child Matters and the subsequent Children
Bill. In particular, we have sought to highlight the challenges
faced by Foyers as these changes roll out.
Key recommendations:
Any future resourcing and organisational
structure for Connexions must preserve the emphasis on partnership
with the voluntary sector and meeting the needs of the most disadvantaged,
but within a universal service. In particular, Connexions Partnerships
should retain the target to reduce the number of young people
not in education, employment or training (NEETs).
We have reservations about Extended
Schools being used as a panacea to address a plethora of issues.
Inter-agency working focused around a school site will fail to
reach the majority of the 10,000 young people Foyers work with
each year - arguably some of the most in need of help. It is therefore
crucial that Government looks creatively about ways of providing
alternative hubs for young people to access support services,
and this should include engaging with the voluntary sector.
We note with regret, the omission
of housing from the Children Bill. Housing need has a fundamental
impact on the life chances of young people, and must be addressed
in any new joined up approach taken by local authorities and other
agencies.
INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Foyer Federation is the UK's leading
youth organisation providing the largest network of accommodation
integrated with education and training opportunities for 16-25
year-olds in housing need.
1.2 Foyers provide accommodation with opportunity
for young people, and a community in which they can grow towards
independence and thrive. By integrating training and job search,
personal support and motivation with a place to live, they provide
a bridge to independent living, and a chance for young people
to realise their full potential.
1.3 There are around 130 Foyers across the
UK supporting over 10,000 young people every year. There are various
models, ranging in size from fewer than ten beds to well over
200. Foyers can be developed as new builds or as conversions from
existing projects and services. All Foyers are independently developed
and managed by local partnerships and/or Housing Associations,
but the Foyer Federation and the Foyer Accreditation Scheme connect
them all through shared values, operating principles and a quality
framework.
1.4 Foyers aim to meet their mission statement
by providing affordable and secure accommodation with personal
support and access to training and employment. Unlike other accommodation,
the Foyer requires a two-way agreement with residents, so that
in exchange for accommodation and use of the Foyer services, the
young person commits to working on an action plan to move towards
personal and economic independence.
1.5 What therefore marks Foyers out from
other solutions to housing need amongst young people is their
holistic approach to breaking the no home: no job: no home cycle
experienced by many homeless and marginalised young people.
1.6 This submission outlines The Foyer Federation's
views and concerns in relation to Every Child Matters and the
Children Bill and developments that have taken place since the
publication of the Green Paper.
THE FUTURE
OF THE
CONNEXIONS SERVICE
2.1 The Foyer movement has developed a close
working relationship with Connexions since its inception, at local,
regional and national levels. Over the past three years, we have
conducted an annual survey amongst Foyers which collates feedback
on their experience of working with the service. This evidence
highlights the steady improvement of the Connexions service, especially
for hard to reach groups. For example, in 2004, only 14% of respondents
judged the service to be poor, compared to 23% in 2003.
2.2 The survey concentrates on the relationship
between Foyers and Connexions services, the quality of service
offered to young people in Foyers, and the involvement of young
people in Foyers in the Connexions Service, for example through
sitting on interview panels for Connexions staff.
2.3 We believe that the 86% satisfaction
rating highlighted in this year's survey demonstrates that the
consistent emphasis on partnership between Connexions and the
voluntary sector over the past four years is now bearing fruit.
This partnership has taken time to build and it is vital that
any changes in structure do not disrupt the working relationships
on the ground.
2.4 In the run up to this year's budget,
The Foyer Federation, along with leading youth charities, NCVYS,
UK Youth, the YMCA, Fairbridge and Rathbone, made a public request
to Ministers to ensure that any future resourcing and organisational
structure for Connexions preserves this emphasis on partnership
and meeting the needs of the most disadvantaged, but within a
universal service.
2.5 Any new arrangement should meet the
following tests:
Partnerships retain the target to
reduce the number of young people not in education, employment
or training (NEETs).
Partnerships have explicit performance
objectives in terms of partnership with the voluntary sector eg
the percentage of Connexions sites in voluntary sector settings,
and the involvement of the voluntary sector in governance structures.
Partnerships are able to demonstrate
that advice is given from an impartial standpoint, not influenced
by the institution in which the Adviser may be based.
2.6 A great deal of resource has also been
invested into setting up the service and promoting the Connexions
brand, which is now well recognised amongst young people. However,
continuing to use the brand for an entirely different service
subsumed by local authorities would be both disingenuous and confusing.
2.7 If the Connexions service was to be
brought under local authority control, we would be concerned about
how that might affect its spending priorities and its engagement
with the voluntary sector.
2.8 If, as early evidence indicates, the
reforms resulting from Every Child Matters and the Children Bill
means that Children's Trusts are dominated by education departments,
we would be concerned about a return to the very problems that
led to the creation of Connexions in the first placeand
in particular a lack of attention to young people who need a second
chance in learning and skills.
EXTENDED SCHOOLS
3.1 We welcome the joined up, inter-agency
approach around which the Extended Schools principle is based.
However, we have reservations about them being seen as a panaceaaddressing
a range of issues, many of which may manifest themselves more
fundamentally outside the school gates and may mean school is
not the appropriate place in which to tackle them.
3.2 Inter-agency working focused around
a school site will fail to reach the majority of the 10,000 young
people Foyers work with each year - arguably some of the most
in need of help. These young people have the weakest links with
schools, either because they have dropped out, have been excluded
or indeed are wary about accessing services in a relatively formal
environment.
3.3 These concerns are supported by research
conducted by think tank Demos in Extended schools: can health,
social and education staff learn to work together?, which
found that the best work was often not being carried out by official
extended schools, but other schools where pupils and voluntary
organisations helped develop new ways of working with health and
social care services. The paper also goes on to warn of the danger
that extended schools could "suck resources" from their
local communities.
ALTERNATIVE HUBS
FOR SERVICE
DELIVERY
4.1 It is crucial that Government looks
creatively about ways of providing alternative hubs for young
people to access support services, and this should include engaging
with the voluntary sector.
4.2 For example, health has become an increasingly
prominent concern for Foyer managers and residents. Young people
were either not accessing the healthcare they needed, or the support
did not meet their specific needs. In response, the Federation
set up a number of initiatives to support Foyers. The Foyer Federation
supports health services in Foyers through a programme of sharing
good practice and building links with statutory services, which
is funded by a Department of Health Section 64 grant.
4.3 In addition, a number of grant programmes
have funded health activities in Foyers, notably the Gatsby Health
Partnership grants, funding everything from a one-day health fair
to a year's part-time health post in a Foyer. So far all these
projects have led to work that has continued, usually with PCT
funding, after the duration of the grant. This highlights the
real added value the voluntary sector can bring as a neutral intermediary,
helping the statutory sector reach out to the hardest to help
in a less formal and intimidating environment.
4.4 The Foyer Federation has also recently
launched the national roll out of our homelessness prevention
pilot, Safe Moves, attended by Homelessness Minister Jeff
Rooker. Safe Moves, a national partnership between the Foyer Federation
and Connexions, brings together a range of local agencieslocal
authority housing and social services departments, Children's
Trusts, Connexions, YOTs, DATs, Community Safety Partnerships,
schools, Foyers and the policeto co-ordinate interventions
aimed at supporting young people who are experiencing family distress,
have run away or are at risk of becoming homeless. The three main
elements offered by the programme are peer mentoring, family mediation
and lifeskills training.
4.5 The Foyer Federation initiated the Safe
Moves project after listening to the views and experiences
of Foyer residents, and recognising that the expertise of the
Foyer movement could be applied to prevention and early intervention.
Peer mentoring has been a particularly powerful element of the
initiative. In the words of a resident at Bradford Foyer: "If
only someone had told me how hard it would be to live away from
homebut it would have had to be someone like me."
4.6 The programme has been piloted in four
separate areas over the last 18 months. An evaluation of the pilot
stage was conducted by the Centre for Housing Policy at the University
of York and a toolkit has been produced as a "how to"
guide for other agencies seeking to adopt the model. The Foyer
Federation will offer national management support to agencies
wishing to develop Safe Movesso far around 47 have
expressed an interestand the Office of the Deputy Prime
Minister has committed further funding to support the roll out
of the scheme nationwide.
DATA SHARING
5.1 The Foyer Federation's experience indicates
that there is an inconsistent approach to information sharing
between statutory agencies, with some far more willing and/or
able to share information than others, particularly for those
who are aged 13 and over. This is despite the guidance issued
by the Information Commissioner to the Connexions service.
5.2 For inter-agency and inter-sectoral
working to be meaningful, a clear protocol and code of practice
must be developed in relation to clients aged 13 and above, to
which all agencies must adhere. This system would ideally be IT
based, however, any new software system should not place undue
burdens on voluntary sector partners, either in terms of cost,
training or implementation.
ROLE OF
THE CHILDREN'S
COMMISSIONER AND
THE VOICE
OF YOUNG
PEOPLE
6.1 We are disappointed to note that the
Government did not agree to include young people in the title
of the Children's Commissioner, and that the powers do not match
those of NI, Scotland and Wales, with there being no duty on the
new Commissioner to investigate individual cases.
6.2 We also note with regret, the omission
of any reference to housing in the Children Bill. Housing need
has a fundamental impact on the life chances of young people,
and must be addressed in any new joined up approach taken by local
authorities and other agencies. The Foyer concept recognises the
interdependency between housing and access to education and training
and the need for a holistic response to a young person's needs.
We would hope that any guidance issued to Children's Trusts takes
this into account in setting priorities for their working practices.
CONCLUSION
Any future resourcing and organisational structure
for Connexions must preserve the emphasis on partnership with
the voluntary sector and meeting the needs of the most disadvantaged,
but within a universal service. In particular, Connexions Partnerships
should retain the target to reduce the number of young people
not in education, employment or training (NEETs).
We have reservations about Extended Schools
being used as a panacea to address a plethora of issues. Inter-agency
working focused around a school site will fail to reach the majority
of the 10,000 young people Foyers work with each yeararguably
some of the most in need of help. It is therefore crucial that
Government looks creatively about ways of providing alternative
hubs for young people to access support services, and this should
include engaging with the voluntary sector.
We note with regret, the omission of housing
from the Children Bill. Housing need has a fundamental impact
on the life chances of young people, and must be addressed in
any new joined up approach taken by local authorities and other
agencies.
November 2004
|