Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1095
- 1099)
WEDNESDAY 1 DECEMBER 2004 (AFTERNOON)
MR DES
JAMES, MRS
DOREEN JAMES,
MR JAMES
COLLINSON, MRS
YVONNE COLLINSON,
MR GEOFF
GRAY AND
MRS DIANE
GRAY
Q1095 Chairman: Ladies and gentlemen,
thank you very much for coming along. Our inquiry could not have
been completealthough we have not yet finishedwithout
the presence of and listening to people whose children died. It
must be rather difficult for you and we all appreciate you coming
along. I think a number of you were here this morning, so the
questions we are going to ask this afternoon are pretty much those
we asked this morning. So there are no hidden questions with which
we are going to try to ambush you. We will try, as far as humanly
possible, to be informal, although it is artificially informal
(a) because of the subject, and (b) because of the general ethos
and structure of Select Committees. We spoke to the Catterick
families this morning; and you are here this afternoon. Tomorrow,
so I read, we are holding a secret meeting. I must tell you that
it is not a secret meeting; it is not that the people are so intimidated
that they are not prepared to come and speak publicly, it is an
open meeting, 11.30, Wilson Room. The reason it is not taking
place in this format is that the parents who are coming, their
children's deaths did not fall within the remit of our Committee
inquiry, which is Phase 1 and Phase 2 training. So we could not
hold a formal session if it was outside our terms of reference.
The people who are coming are coming with advisers and friends,
and the meeting, I can absolutely assure you, is not closed, which
is why I have given the time and the location. So I do not want
people to think that we are proceeding behind closed doors because
we are not. I said this morning and I repeat itand I am
sorry if you are hearing it for the second time, but there will
be people here who were not here this morningthat our inquiry
was prompted by the deaths of young soldiers at Deepcut Barracks
and elsewhere. However, we are not a substitute for the Police
or a substitute for the judicial process. We will not be questioning
the findings of the Police or the Coroner about how specific deaths
occurred. I am obliged to remind you, and the wider audience who
may be following the Committee's work in this area, that this
inquiry and this evidence session is not the appropriate forum
to make allegations about named officials. Our task is to see
whether the Armed Forces are learning the lessons of the past
and whether they are doing everything that could reasonably be
expected of them to ensure that their training regime and the
culture promote the well-being of the people they are training.
Having said that, we could not have concluded this inquiry without
your presence and the families of those involved in these tragic
events. This session is an opportunity for you to tell us about
your experiences and to give us your views on how duty of care
can be improved. You will have heard the questions this morning;
you will know at the end that we ask questions on the method of
inquiry, so there is no need to raise it early because I promise
you that we will have ample time to deal with it at the end. I
know some of you have been attending our sessions on a fairly
regular basis, like Mr Gray, but for the benefit of those who
may not be aware, could you introduce yourselves and give your
relationship to this inquiryobviously the name of your
child who died. As I said this morning, it is not imperative that
each person answers the question; if the first answer is adequate
then just signify you accept that that first answer reflects the
views of three sets of parents. The fourth set of parents are
not here, and I am aware of the circumstances and I fully understand
them. So I hope this is not too painful a session; we will try
to be as thorough as we can and, subject to the constraints imposed
upon us, it is pretty much open to you to say what you wish because
I do not want to constrain you, subject to the constraints that
you have been made aware of. Perhaps it would be appropriate to
begin left to right, right to left, or whichever way. Right to
left?
Mrs Gray: My name
is Diane Gray and my son was Geoff Gray, who died at Deepcut Army
Barracks.
Mr Gray: My name is Geoff Gray,
also my son Geoff who was found at Deepcut Barracks with a bullet
wound above each eyebrow.
Mrs Collinson: I am Yvonne Collinson;
my son James Collinson died at Deepcut Barracks in March 2002.
Mr Collinson: I am Jimmy Collinson;
my son James Collinson died at Deepcut in 2002.
Mrs James: I am Doreen James;
my daughter Cheryl James died at Deepcut in 1995 with a gunshot
wound to the head.
Mr James: I am Cheryl's father.
Q1096 Chairman: Thank you very much.
I will start off with the same question that began this morning's
session. When your children applied to join the Army were you,
as parents, given information about the training regime and what
your kids might be experiencing upon entering the training regime?
Mr James?
Mr James: We had a number of documentsI
cannot bring them to mind instantly, I have to saybut we
certainly did not have any detailed correspondence and certainly
no meetings, no discussions. We were aware that Cheryl's basic
training would take place at Pirbright over a 10-week period,
during which time the recruits are not allowed to come home, and
in actual fact, so far as we were aware, that part of her training
was successful for her personally; and, again, as far as we are
aware, there were no issues involving that training. She passed
out first time and all the reports that we still have on file
were very complimentary from her trainers. She then went from
Pirbright to Leconfield at the age of 17 and passed her HGV driving
licence, even though she had never sat a test to drive a carhad
never driven a car, to my knowledgeand again passed out
very successfully. She arrived at Deepcut in November 1995 and
within eight days she was dead.
Q1097 Chairman: Was the letter addressed
to her or to you?
Mr James: Which letter, sorry?
Q1098 Chairman: The letter telling
you about the course that she would be doing, the contents of
that?
Mrs James: I do not remember any
correspondence on that, no.
Mr James: It is vague, I am sorry.
Q1099 Chairman: No, it is a long
time ago.
Mr James: It is an area which
we have never really reviewed or assessed in any way since her
death. All we know is that at the time she started doing a lot
of training. Her first choice was the Air Force actually, but
she was so intent on this life of adventure and travel, and all
the other things that are attractive perhaps to a certain section
of young people; but she failed the fitness test to get into the
Air Force.
|