Memorandum by the Royal Institution of
Chartered Surveyors (GG 09)
GALILEO
I am writing on behalf of the Royal Institution
of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) in response to your call for evidence
on Galileo, dated 16th July 2004. RICS is the world's leading
professional body on all aspects of property, construction and
associated environmental issues. It represents, regulates and
promotes the work of property professionals across the world and
has over 110,000 members in 120 countries. It is an independent,
not-for-profit organisation committed to providing impartial,
authoritative advice on major issues affecting business and society.
Under the terms of its Royal Charter RICS is required to act in
the public interest.
A RESPONSE TO
THE TRANSPORT
COMMITTEE FROM
RICS
Although RICS feels that it cannot comment with
authority on all of the questions asked within your press notice
dated 16th July 2004, we believe that HM Government should fully
support the Galileo satellite navigation initiative.
What benefits will Galileo Phase II bring that
EGNOS (European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System) will
not?
The benefits are primarily technical but with
a multitude of possible applications. Others will delve into the
minutia of the technical aspects of EGNOS/Galileo compatibility
but essentially EGNOS is a EU centred GPS augmentation system
that seeks to "piggyback" on already existing Global
Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) such as GPS and Glonass and
is therefore dependent on the operational integrity of said systems.
Galileo will not only provide another signal platform for EGNOS
to operate on but will also provide redundant positional information
that is essential, in say, the emergency services and aviation
environments. EGNOS has also been designed to perfectly augment
and improve the accuracy of Galileo signals (through differential
corrections). It should also be remembered that EGNOS is EU wide
whilst Galileo gives a global remit to possible commercial services.
How important is it for the EU to be independent
of the US Global Positioning System (GPS) and the Russian Global
Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS)?
Others will be better able to comment on this
issue. Suffice to say, that in 2000 President Clinton turned off
"selective availability s/a" and at a stroke improved
GPS accuracy (for public users) by a factor of ten to +/- 10 metres.
The US can easily turn it on again. The Russian system is in a
varying state due to economic difficulties. Galileo is needed
to supersede and augment these already existing systems, in particular,
for aviation purposes.
What are the potential benefits of the Public
Regulated Service (PRS) system? Is it realistic to expect that
Member States will not want to cross-subsidise PRS from commercial
services?
Others will be better able to comment on this
issue, however we believe that the question is unclear.
Are the arrangements to prevent military use of
Galileo sufficiently robust?
Others will be better able to comment on this
issue.
Are arrangements to oversee the security aspects
of Galileo appropriate?
Others will be better able to comment on this
issue.
What are the potential benefits of the programme
to UK industry, and to UK users of Galileo, such as NATS?
RICS believes that the possible future benefits
of high accuracy Galileo positional information are myriad and
very far-reaching. Many high quality and very in depth documents
already exist on this subject and other organisations will probably
go into more technical details. From high precision farming to
the tracking of animals (witness the confusion during the recent
Foot and Mouth epidemic here in the UK) to the registration of
GM crops, Galileo will serve to aid the rural economy to reach
a more efficient model. Within the realms of transport; road charging,
congestion charging, vehicle/fleet management and tracking, toll
charges, bus/tram/rail safety and tracking will be improved.
Safety within aviation is defined by accurate
navigation. The availability of high precision Galileo signals
will further augment existing navigation services.
Environmental programmes, flooding alert systems,
supra national geographic information initiatives such as Inspire
will all benefit.
Highly accurate clock (timing is one of the
"hidden" successes of GNSS) transmissions will allow
more efficient and faster data transactions, improving internet
and intranet capabilities.
As an island, the UK is highly dependent on
marine navigation, particularly in high density/use areas such
as the English Channel, Galileo will further aid navigation systems
employed by mariners, natural resource (oil/gas) companies and
commercial operations.
As already mentioned the Galileo has a great
multitude of potential benefits, we would like to again state
that RICS fully supports this EU initiative.
James Kavanagh BSc(Hons) C.Geog MInstCES
Geomatics Faculty
Assistant Director, Faculties and Forums
September 2004
|