Memorandum by the Leicester Group of the
Victorian Society (HIS 23)
Organisations responsible for urban regeneration
in Leicester, we believe, are not giving sufficient regard to
historic buildings. In Conservation Areas developers push extremely
hard to either demolish or over-develop both listed and quality
unlisted buildings. This pressure becomes extremely difficult
for local authorities to resist.
We believe that it is vital that, before regeneration
takes place, there is a thorough, professional survey of potential
redevelopment areas to identify significant historic buildings
parallel to the archaeological surveys required in PPG 16. We
believe that Local Authorities do not at present have the resources
to do this.
Leicester is one of those urban areas that never
received a resurvey of its historic buildings stock in the 1970/80s
period under the Michael Heseltine review. This means that there
are numerous buildings and areas of historic and architectural
importance that have not been fully researched. It is precisely
these areas (five of them in Leicester) that are currently undergoing
substantial redevelopment today.
Groups like the Leicester Group of the Victorian
Society, find themselves in very embarrassing and difficult situations.
We only hear of projects to demolish or substantially alter buildings
at a very late stage in development proposals when others have
invested large amounts of money and time in developing proposals
and where one project may depend on the success of other adjacent
projects. Once the local group of the Victorian Society knows
of a project or area of redevelopment we undertake research if
we believe buildings of historic worth may be involved. We are
a voluntary group with members with full time jobs. It can take
us a long time to uncover significant historical information to
clinch the historic worth of a building sufficient to persuade
English Heritage or the local authority that the building should
be listed or the area made a conservation area. The redevelopment
in Leicester at present is so widespread, covering such a vast
area of the older historic city, that we find it difficult to
keep up and ahead.
This recently led to the application by the
Leicester Group of the Victorian Society for listed status of
a building on the periphery of Rafael Vinoli's new theatre for
Leicester. It sent the developers and regeneration bosses into
jitters because of the millions of pounds already invested in
other projects in the St George's Cultural Quarter that depended
on the flagship theatre design and threw into question the possibility
of the architects' ability to modify the theatre building should
listed status be granted. This would have been unnecessary had
the local authority or English Heritage undertaken a survey to
ascertain the value of the unlisted buildings within the conservation
area.
This illustrates too the low value attached
to many distinctive but unlisted buildings in Conservation Areas
which, with pressure for development being so intense and ultimate
profits so high, leads to these small buildings being threatened
with demolition. Yet these are precisely the buildings that lend
character to a Conservation Area and a major reason why the areas
are so designated.
It certainly led to the Leicester Group of the
Victorian Society, which tries to play a positive role, being
vilified for simply trying to call attention to what was a very
significant building within the area. We envisage similar problems
on other sites within the city where we believe there should be
created a Conservation Area. Such a proposal at this stage in
regeneration in Leicester we know will be frowned uponbut
our recent researches indicate that Frog Island, for example,
is highly suitable both historically and architecturally for such
a designation and we shall be requesting Conservation Area status.
We could also give examples of Listed Buildings
where pressure has been extremely strong to demolish historically
significant elements in order to pack in extra floor space eg.
Cripples' Guild/Disabled Building, Art Nouveau style in St George's
Quarter building. Here the pretty parts of the building are to
be saved and converted but the extremely unusual workshops of
the Guild (important as perhaps the first and only early examples
of workshops for the disabled) are to be demolished to make way
for a high rise residential block rather than incorporated into
the new restaurant complex.
Our proposal therefore is for resources to go
into researching the historic and architectural environment (as
is done for archaeology) prior to redevelopment so that developers,
regeneration companies, the local authorities and amenity societies
can properly plan the redevelopment of areas knowing precisely
what is significant and should be saved.
Rowan Roenisch Caseworker
Leicester Group of the Victorian Society
|