Memorandum by Norfolk Allergy Diagnostic
and Advisory Service (NADAAS) (AL 12)
1. OBJECTIVES
OF NADAAS
Recognition of the allergy patient/sufferer.
Provision of allergy diagnostic assessment/skin prick testing.
Provision of patient empowerment to manage and
understand their allergic condition.
To improve quality of life of the allergic patient/sufferer.
To provide education and allergy awareness to
fellow professionals in primary care.
2. OVERVIEW OF
THE SERVICE
NADAAS was initially set up as a private service
in 1986-87, following a submission of a paper on NADAAS cost effectiveness(1)
in terms of health management and financial savings to the NHS,
NADAAS was awarded a contract by the then Norfolk FHSA on a self-employed
basis. The funding is on a cost per case basis, which includes
the costs of running the service, travel, administrative help,
(provided by my husband) and salary.
Patients are referred by their GP, hospital
consultant or doctor.
The patients are seen for allergy assessment
at their GP surgery or another designated local surgery. (The
latter in order to cut waiting list time). Patients are offered
a choice of venue and appointment time. Currently funding is provided
by four PCT's and administered quarterly by one PCT on behalf
of al1 four.
Administration of NADAAS is carried out from
the providers' home office, where the referrals are received.
Following an holistic assessment of all the
patient's symptoms, skin testing and advice on management, a full
report is given to the patient, GP, Hospital consultant or Doctor.
The consultation takes one to two hours and is a one-stop shop,
in addition NADAAS offers a patient phone-in service between 6-7
pm Monday to Wednesday" evenings.
Clinic waiting list can be six to 12 weeks (depending
on holiday leave etc).
NADAAS receives approximately 400 NHS referrals
per year, funding allows for 300 patients per year, which is allocated
on a cost per case basis. (32,900 per annum).
Appointments are initially arranged by phone
then followed up by written confirmation.
3. OUTCOMES/BENEFITS
OF NADAAS
NADAAS meets the requirements set out in the
European White Paper (Brussels), Allergic Diseases as a Public
Health Problem 1997,(2) which states "that the majority of
allergy care can and should be managed in primary care".
And the criteria stated in Containing the Allergy Epidemic the
unmet need" from the Royal College of Physicians, 2003,(3)
"Primary care must ultimately provide the front line care
for allergy".
NADAAS has been able to demonstrate(1) in those
patients found to be allergic over a period of 18 months post
allergy assessment:
A reduction in prescription rates of 59%.
A reduction in repeated doctor consultation of
70%.
An improvement in well being of 70%.
NADAAS is able to demonstrate that 3% of patients
assessed required review appointments and less than 3% required
referring on to an organ based consultant with an interest in
allergy or to the Regional Allergy specialist.
The overall cost of the service is cheaper than
that offered by a hospital consultant/doctor.
The service is valued by the GP's, currently
NADAAS has 120 surgeries on its books and a recent survey has
shown that over the past five years 30 doctors from the local
hospital have used the service. These include doctors from Respiratory,
ENT, Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Dermatology departments.
NADAAS is valued by the patients, they are (particularly
children) appreciative of being able to be seen at their familiar
surgery. Generally on arrival they are seen promptly but rarely
more than five minutes later than the given appointment. Patients
value not having long journeys to local or district hospitals,
thus reducing the amount of time lost from school or work. There
are no parking problems and no parking costs. They value the quiet
one to one, one-stop allergy assessment.
NADAAS is recognised nationally and internationally.
In 1998-99 two representatives from the Department
of Health, a Nurse advisor and an administrator spent a day in
the NADDAAS clinic. They assessed the service to be a model of
excellence, which should be emulated across primary care.
4. THE PROVIDER
She has presented papers nationally and internationally,
written numerous articles on allergy and published a book on Skin
Prick Testing in Clinical Practice. She has received travel scholarships
and national awards for her unique work in allergy. She has been
involved in professional education. development and implementation
of education programmes.
She is Co-Founder member, past Trustee and current
Vice-President of Allergy UK.
5. PLANNED DEMISE
OF NADAAS
Reasons given for the cut in the service:
(a) Allergy is not a high priority in HA
budget.
(b) Service is only patchily used.
(c) Allergy can now be managed in the local
Dermatology Department and the Regional Hospital in Cambridge.
Some Doctors using and valuing NADAAS have written
to advise that they were never consulted about the cessation of
the primary care allergy service, despite published reports to
the contrary.
6. RECOMENDATION
(a) It would be helpful if HA were to offer
local education programmes for primary care workers in order to
recognise the potential allergic patient, though it is apparent
that those doctors who do not use NADAAS are less likely to attend
allergy education programmes.
(b) Allergy management should be based on
a pyramid plan with Primary care identifying the allergic patient,
referring them (up the pyramid) on to local doctor/nurse with
an interest or specialist skills in allergy who would then be
able to identify the more complex allergic cases for referral
to the regional allergist, (top of pyramid). This will reduce
long-waiting lists at regional hospitals, and afford early education
of the patient and carers on the management of their allergy.
REFERENCES
(1) Brydon M J, The effectiveness of a peripatetic
allergy nurse practitioner service in managing atopic allergy
in general practicea pilot study. Clinical and Experimental
Allergy, 1993, Vol 23, pages 1037-1044.
(2) Van Moerbeke D et al, European Allergy
Paper, Allergic Diseases as a Public Health Problem. May 1997.
UCB Institute of Allergy, Brussels. ISBN: 2-87301-018-5.
(3) Royal College of Physicians, Containing
The Allergy Epidemic. June 2003. Summary and recommendations of
a new report from the RCP Allergythe unmet need: a blueprint
for better patient care.
May 2004
|