Why a regulatory reform order?
9. The Government decided to press ahead with a regulatory
reform order as an interim step in order to deal with the situation
which was predicted to arise in Wales in 2003, when each of the
offices was scheduled to fall vacant. It considered that there
were potential difficulties in advertising three separate posts
under existing arrangements, since each post "would demand
only a very modest time commitment, with, on a pro-rata basis,
an equally modest salary."[7]
The Government was concerned that advertising each post separately
on such terms "would not attract a candidate of the necessary
calibre and would create adverse public perception of the importance
and value government attaches to both [sic] offices."[8]
It therefore considered that steps should be taken to enable a
single individual to be appointed to all three posts.
10. Before embarking on consultation on a proposed
regulatory reform order, the Government sought the Committee's
views on the likely appropriateness of such an order. The Committee
considered the request for advice in March 2003 and indicated
that, on the evidence before it, the matter was appropriate for
delegated legislation. The Committee's response is discussed in
more detail at paragraph 29 below.
11. The Committee noted that any advertisement seeking
applicants to hold the three posts jointly should indicate that
the appointment to all three posts would be subject to Parliamentary
approval of a regulatory reform order. The information pack sent
to all applicants contained the following statement:
In March 2003 the Assembly Government and the
Secretary of State announced that in the light of the responses
received they intend to proceed with the establishment of the
single Ombudsman's Office. This will require primary legislation,
and is dependent upon Parliamentary time becoming available for
the necessary Bill. In the meantime, and as a first step to establishing
the new Office, it is intended in 2003 to appoint one individual
to hold the three existing Offices simultaneously. To enable this
to happen, it is necessary for Parliament to agree to a Regulatory
Reform Order; the process of securing such an Order is now underway.
The successful appointment to this Office, as advertised, is dependent
on that.
Present appointments
12. On her appointment as the Parliamentary Commissioner
for Administration ("the PCA") in 2002, Ms Ann Abraham
was also appointed Acting WAO and HSCW. The Government was initially
keen to have the order in place by November 2003, to enable the
successful applicant for the posts of WAO, HSCW and Local Commissioner
to take them up simultaneously. Ms Abraham has agreed to remain
in post as Acting WAO until November 2004, in the expectation
that the proposed order will then be in place.[9]
13. The three posts were advertised simultaneously
in March 2004 under the non-statutory title of Public Services
Ombudsman for Wales.[10]
Mr Adam Peat was appointed as Local Commissioner of the CLAW (in
succession to Mr Elwyn Moseley) on 1 October 2003, and Health
Service Commissioner for Wales (in succession to Ms Abraham) on
4 November 2003. Should the proposed order be made, it is intended
that Mr Peat will succeed Ms Abraham as WAO in November 2004.[11]
1 Copies of the proposal are available to Members of
Parliament from the Vote Office and to members of the public from
the Department. The proposal is also available on the Cabinet
Office website: http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/regulation/act/proposals.htm
Back
2
This arrangement is made under the provisions of section 41 of
the Government of Wales Act 1998. Back
3
An outline of the functions and responsibilities of each post
is included at the Annex to this Report. Back
4
Third Report from the Public Administration Committee, Ombudsman
Issues, HC (2002-03) 448 Back
5
2002 asp 11 Back
6
The SPSO's present deputies are Carolyn Hirst, Lewis Shand Smith
and Eric Drake. Back
7
Explanatory statement, para 12 Back
8
Ibid. Back
9
Appendix B, para 7, n 1 Back
10
An extract from the information pack provided to candidates for
the post is reproduced in the Annex to this Report. Back
11
Explanatory statement, para 16 Back