Memorandum from Michael Morris Franks
INTRODUCTION
I have been a keen amateur astronomer for over
30 years and I always try to introduce my friends to the beauty
of the night sky. When I was in Morocco I was struck by the number
of stars which were visible and how the Milky Way really was seen
as a band of light stretching across the night sky. I deplore
the erosion of the starry night sky, which has occurred over the
last 50 years in the UK, in both urban and rural areas, as a result
of badly aimed and unregulated lights, both public and private.
I am writing to the Select Committee to voice that concern and
to urge the committee to play their part in regaining that part
of the environment, which has no protection at present.
Question 1. What has been the impact of light
pollution on UK astronomy?
Since the middle of the twentieth century, the
night sky has gradually been invaded by waste upward light, to
the extent that there is practically nowhere in the United Kingdom
today where a truly dark night sky can be seen. I deplore the
effects upon amateur astronomy of both skyglow (the glow in the
sky caused by wasted upward light) and light trespass (the shining
of lights across property boundaries, disturbing the enjoyment
and tranquillity of the night for neighbours). I believe that
a well lit environment is compatible with a reasonable view of
the stars. It is not only professional astronomers who are driven
from their traditional observing sites by skyglow and light trespass.
Amateurs often travel many miles to escape stray light, in order
to find a darker environmentbut such places are becoming
harder to find nowadays.
Amateurs still play a great part in original
astronomical research, and the discovery of comets and supernovae,
and original image work, are largely in the amateur field. Also,
a view of the night sky has often been the inspiration for a scientific
career. Will tomorrow's young people be robbed of such a view?
Question 2. Are current planning guidelines strong
enough to protect against light pollution?
Question 3. Are planning guidelines being applied
and enforced effectively?
A short drive around urban and rural areas at
night will confirm that there is a continuing proliferation of
poorly aimed and too-bright lighting. From my house I can see
examples of office buildings, which remain brightly lit even though
they are empty at night. Where are these so-called guidelines?
If they exist, they are being ignored everywhere.
I urge the Science and Technology Committee
to use its influence to steer Parliament along the road to a solution
of the problems light pollution causes. It is high time for real
action and regulation, or children will only be able to look at
the stars in picture books or on computers screens by the year
2100 and never see with their own unassisted eyes the beauty of
the night sky.
21 April 2003
|